Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Regarding UAL Troubles

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
BACK TO MY QUESTION

Folks:
I really tried to steer the thread in a different direction. No one can change any hiring process that happened in the past, whether it needed to be changed or not. Just as no one can change the fact that 19 hijackers permanently changed the airline industry and the New York City skyline, plus a lot of lives lost and changed.

My question is what happens next? Does anyone have any hard facts about UAL's finances? What will it take for them to survive? Is there an economic "D-Day" that will occur in the near future that permanently decides UAL's fate?
 
I don't have any particular knowledge of, or interest in United's preference for certain applicants. My only thaught on this subject is as follows. I interviewed with United in the late 90s and I have to say from my own personal experience that the HR lady and the Captain that interviewed me were the most unprofessional, outright rude a$$ Ho$$$ that I have ever run across. I had been told by friends that had interviewed there before that at some point in the interview that they liked to put you under some stress to see how you handle it. This went way beyond stress test. This was outright abuse of their position. I interviewed at three other airlines before going to Delta, and I must say that they were all very professional and very nice people. The way it is pretty much everywhere except United. I hope you guys keep flying, as a furloughed pilot I know it sucks. But if anyone at United has to loose their jobs I would love to see your HR and pilot interviewers signing up for unemployment benefits. Tell them to give me a call, I'll tell them how it is done.
 
xXpress1, please don't quote me on this one but I was told by an HR rep that when they pulled from the stacks that they did it like a card game. Pulled 1 from the top of each stack for the interview and started over again until they got their desired number.

At the time United was interviewing 1000 pilots per year so you can imagine how many times they pulled from each stack.

I do not agree with you that it was legalized discrimination, but it was an effort to right a wrong. Like I said a while ago, no one was in competition with a minority except another minority. That could be both a plus for a minority and a minus depending on who was in the stack. If you were in the minority stack than you received roughly 1 out of 15 interviews. Those are not good odds depending on what was happening at the time.

I also think this thread is relevant to United's future. Because whether you agree with the system or not it will still be in place when they start hiring again so it helps to understand how they do it.

acarpe3448:

You got your wish. They cleaned house except for 1 or 2 people in 2000.


You don;t have to be an HR Guru to understand the concept of "competitively qualified", it's pretty simple, really. A 450tt piston twin driver is not competitively qualified. Can't you just concede that obvious point? And it's not a "second-hand story", I can name names of half a dozen I know personally. My College had a UAL internship program, so believe me, I saw this crap firsthand for four years.

My point is qualifications are relative to timing. You don't have to debate me, just ask any senior Captain that has been around for 30 years or more. In the late 60's early 70's the airlines needed people BADLY. They literally were taking people off the street with NO time, had them get some hours and get a multi-engine rating and then they were placed in the right seat of a B-707 or larger with less than 250hrs. I guess they weren't qualified either. Oh no wait, they were white males, that's ok then. There were hundreds more experienced black males that were not hired aka Tuskegee Airmen. Very few if any made it in to the airlines.


I'm not worried about anyone. Well, I take that back. I am worried about you, a little. Do us all a favor, and have a little face-to-face with a mental health professional, would you? Be sure to bring up your need to demonize those who disagree with you, and your deep-seated hatred for white males . . . . .
Anything else is "a lie"? So much for debate and discourse. Obviously, with you it is just a waste of time, since everyone else's opinion is "a lie"?

So many personal attacks, that's the sign of someone who has lost his point and cannot concede. Everything I gave you can be backed up with hard facts opposed to rumors and stories. If you do not believe how United hires ask Kit Darby, President of AIRInc.
If you don't like the way they do it than tough, but that's no reason to personally attack someone.

Oh and I don't have a "deep-seated hatred for white males". I hate it when people try to use the excuse that they didn't get hired because of X group or Y group. There is so much misinformation that goes around about minorities in this industry it is disgusting and people tend to believe the worst of it without even bothering to check the facts.

Please tell me when was the last time YOU had to take 6 checkrides in your first 6 months at an airline even though you did nothing wrong, but the only reason it was done because you were a minority and others hated that fact? The Chief Pilot finally had enough and told the pilot to just swap bases and he was removing all of the letters from the pilot's file. No one should have to go through that. That was 2 years ago.
 
Last edited:
Kind of sad how the whole story began isn't it? Think back to the days when all you needed was a Comm ticket with wet ink and UAL would train you the rest of the way. Then consider how UAL and other airlines of course would not hire vets like the Tuskeegee Airmen. That's what gets to me. Those guys risked life and limb, distinguished themselves in battle, and they couldn't get a job.
It doesn't make the reverse discriminatory practices of the 90's right but it's important to realize why things like equal opportunity hiring practices came about.
 
flyndesk said:

Kid Char, it looks like you might be at JetBlue, what a great job!

A quick check of his posts reveal he is not at jetBlue. Besides, their screening process does a good job of weeding out the d!ckheads. My guess is he's either at Ryan or USA 3000.
 
Red Tail-

Ever take a Logic course? Apparently not, because your "reasoning" defies any semblance of logic:


In the late 60's early 70's the airlines needed people BADLY. They literally were taking people off the street with NO time, had them get some hours and get a multi-engine rating and then they were placed in the right seat of a B-707 or larger with less than 250hrs. I guess they weren't qualified either.

The issue is "competitively qualified" . . . recruiting minorities at a lower experience level than the rest of the applicants is discriminating against the "non minority" candidates.

If you do not believe how United hires ask Kit Darby, President of AIRInc.

I suspected you were using sources like Kit. Anyone else rolling on the floor over this one?


Oh and I don't have a "deep-seated hatred for white males". I hate it when people try to use the excuse that they didn't get hired because of X group or Y group.


I don't think I have been discriminated against, but I saw firsthand the bizarre practices at UAL and I certainly have a right to voice my opinion about what I saw.

Please tell me when was the last time YOU had to take 6 checkrides in your first 6 months at an airline even though you did nothing wrong, but the only reason it was done because you were a minority and others hated that fact?

You have lost me here. If that happened to you, sorry, but from what I have observed from your writings in this forum, it seems very likely that it was your personality, not your gender or race that probably got you singled out.

In any event, it very apparent to me that UAL had some ridiculous hiring policies in effect during most of the 1990's. Hopefully, should they survive Chapter 11, they will have learned from those mistakes and move forward. Hopefully, you will do the same.
 
Last edited:
The issue is "competitively qualified" . . . recruiting minorities at a lower experience level than the rest of the applicants is discriminating against the "non minority" candidates.

Competitively qualified, once again as long as they meet the airline minimums then it is all good minority or not. What you fail to realize is that minorities were not the only ones being taken at or near those minimums, just the most visible. There were several others including interns, which by the way had their own stack as well, those with recommendations, and those whose parents worked there. If you're going to complain about one group you should complain about all of them, but because they are not an easy target why bother? Not to mention that there were a lot more of them than any minority group.
However, if I were to use your logic then United would hire starting from the highest time applicant (15,000 Hrs?) on down. Guess what, they would never get below 7000hrs. Last time I checked that wasn't an acceptable way to hire pilots due to several other factors.



You have lost me here. If that happened to you, sorry, but from what I have observed from your writings in this forum, it seems very likely that it was your personality, not your gender or race that probably got you singled out.

Again with the personal attacks? That says a lot about you.

No, it didn't happen to me. I have had other situations. It's easy to ignore the difficulties that a minority faces in this industry if you are not one. It's easy to sit back and complain about affirmative action when you are not the one being targeted on a daily basis by your peers. It's easy to cry "Reverse Discrimination!" when applying for a major airline job when you are not the one who cannot get a flight instructing or cargo job because of prejudices.
But these are facts most people either cannot see because of their position in society or turns a blind eye to.

The hiring practices were at United for a reason. The alternative was to leave the status quo. If that was done there would still be a very small percentage of minorities in the airlines today.

P.S. I made it to the majors on my qualifications not because I'm a minortiy.
 
You say you made it to a major "on your own merits"?

Sad to say, we'll never know if that is true, will we? And therein lies part of the problem. . . .
 
Last edited:
One last thing:

I suspected you were using sources like Kit. Anyone else rolling on the floor over this one?

Where do you get your information from, a cracker jack box?

Everything you claimed is unsubstantiated rumor. If you really want to know how United hires here are just a few of the sources I referenced:

Kit Darby - United Pilot, President of AIRInc.

Capt. Bob Norris (Ret. United Pilot) - Interview service based in SFO with a staff of former United pilots who USED TO DO THE INTERVIEWS.

Cheryl Cage - If you don't know this one then you are a sad case.

That's just to name a few. Before you attack anyone, get your facts straight!!!!
 
I haven't seen that much crap spew out of a red tail since the last time I went to the monkey house at the zoo.

You have yourself a good one, now, y'hear?
 
Umm....."Kid Char" who is it you work for?

Sounds like the UAL Flight Officer employment office made the right decision to not hire you. I wouldn't want to spend 5 seconds in a cockpit with you.

LUVtheDC10.....Great post!

Signed,

WHITE MALE-Non Intern UAL pilot...

P.S. Didn't VALUJET charge $12,000 to come work for them? Things that make you go Hmmmmmmmmm.
 
Apparently it's wrong to hire minorities, but to staff an airline full of SCABS is acceptable. UFB!
 
Extra300S said:
P.S. Didn't VALUJET charge $12,000 to come work for them? [/i]

I don't know. I don't work for Valujet. . . . . but next time I fly with a former Valujet guy, I'll ask him. So, what's your point?
 
Last edited:
Extra: another brilliant UAL pilot (not)

Extra300S said:

Umm....."Kid Char" who is it you work for?

Sounds like the UAL Flight Officer employment office made the right decision to not hire you. I wouldn't want to spend 5 seconds in a cockpit with you.


Extra,

I see you are a United pilot. Apparantly you guys aren't too bright, you don't read very well!!!! As I made very clear in several of my posts the UAL employment office did not make a decision to not hire me. I think they would have had a hard time making any kind of a decision about me - since I never sent in an application! Like I said before, even though I was very competitive I made a conscious choice that I would never go to work for a company that had the kind of hiring policy UAL did. I have too much integrity for that. As a result of my decision to stick to principle, I am still gainfully employed in the industry. Funny how things work out huh? And as far as you spending "5 seconds" in the cockpit with me, don't worry - I don't believe you'll ever have that pleasure (suits me fine).

I didn't start this thread for the purpose of bashing UAL guys, the point was to have a rational discussion of UAL's hiring policy. But since another United pilot like Extra saw fit to attack me personally, I can't help but wonder - are all UAL pilots a few french fries short of a full Happy Meal?? How else can you explain the boneheaded decision they made back in 1994 to lock in their pay rates for 6 years (making them ineligible for raises during UAL's most profitable years) in return for company stock that couldn't even be cashed out till retirement??!!!??? You can wipe your butt with that stock now. Talk about being cognitively challeged... I bet management couldn't stop laughing - "the pilots agreed to THAT?? YGBSM!!!"


To the guy talking about UAL choosing applicants from "stacks":

You even admitted they had a special stack just for women/minority applicants. If you can't see how that very fact alone makes the hiring process a travesty.....then all I can say is we think very differently indeed. More politically correct bullpoppy. Just another symptom of what has gone wrong with this country...people think they're entitled cause they are female or black or Asian or Hispanic or Buddhist or they're missing a toe or one ear is bigger than the other, etc. What a disgrace! And the senior UAL pilots who let it go on are just as guilty - they knew what was happening, they knew it was immoral and unethical and unsafe, and they did nothing!

Again just my 2 cents. Those who wish to may flame away - but I'm still entitled to my opinion. It's a free country (for now anyway).
 
Nice crosscut...maybe you should change your name to dumba$$.
Get use to flying that B-1900...
 
Crosscut.

Yea.... A genius comparison, ratio of SCABS not even close. Your ignorant statement speaks volumes.

I hope you enjoy your 1900 at Redneck airlines.
 
spinup said:
Crosscut.

Yea.... A genius comparison, ratio of SCABS not even close. Your ignorant statement speaks volumes.

I hope you enjoy your 1900 at Redneck airlines.

Ratio?

928 v.s. 2,245, but that's beside the pnt

Why, are you still trying to justify your statement?

Was your scab remark to draw attention away from UAL's low time minority hiring practices? If not, I couldn't connect one w/the other???

Don't be throwing stones when you live in a glass house.
 
spinup said:
Spinup-

If you think that AirTran is some "hotbed" of scabs, then you obviously don't know much about the company as you think you do.

Out of our 800 pilots, there are quite a few former Eastern pilots, but only a handful were "scabs". I am sure the rest of the guys who put in 15+ years and then lost their jobs really appreciate some fool like you calling them scabs.

Hey, who knows- the way things are going at UAL right now, you are very likely going to learn what those Eastern guys went through in the early Nineties . . . . In fact, with a little luck, in a few years, you may even experience some dumbass kid mistakenly calling you a scab on a message board, too.

Now, wouldn't that just be ironic as all hell. . . . . .
 
Last edited:
Ty Webb said:
spinup said:
Hey, who knows- the way things are going at UAL right now, you are very likely going to learn what those Eastern guys went through in the early Nineties . . . . hell, with a little luck, you may find some dumbass kid maistakenly calling you a scab on a message board, too.

Now, wouldn't that just be a shame?

They already did - does UAL 85 "B-scale" come to mind?
 
Ty Webb said:
spinup said:
Hey, who knows- the way things are going at UAL right now, you are very likely going to learn what those Eastern guys went through in the early Nineties . . . . In fact, with a little luck, in a few years, you may even experience some dumbass kid mistakenly calling you a scab on a message board, too.

Now, wouldn't that just be ironic as all hell. . . . . .

Don't bother with this guy. Typical ignorant attitude.

The EAL guys in retrospect were better off since their company tanked in a era when there were jobs available to start a new career.

The UAL pilots are doomed when they go 7 because the market is flooded with pilots. And I firmly believe that liquidation is coming quickly. I would be surprised if they made it through the summer.
 
Interesting assumtion that I was refering to AirTran. I have no clue the number over there, glad its small. I do however at other airlines.

So let me get the gist of this thread. Minorities No, Scabs Yes.

A bunch of brilliant aviators.
 
No one said not to hire minorities!

What was said was that it was wrong to hire minorities over other, more competitively qualified pilots.

The problem with people such as you and Redtailer is that you can't seem to get your mind around the fact that it is just as wrong to discriminate against white males as it is to discriminate against anyone else.

It is not possible to have preferential hiring without discriminating against someone else.

Sheeesh!
 
Ty Webb,

The intention of preferential interviewing is to right past indiscretions in employment practices; aviation is riddled with these. I agree with you that at some point when a fair balance is found this should stop.

Sadly, many airmen take the viewpoint that minorities didn't earn their jobs because their career path wasn't "difficult enough", perpetuating discriminatory views without regard. Minority airmen and women go through their careers viewed as second class aviators by the ill informed.

It's not acceptable to discriminate in the past, then neglect to make amends. Looking at this another way; How do you now feel being (as you say) discriminated against as a white male? What you and I are dealing with is a fraction of what minorities have delt with in aviation's history.

A logical conclusion to be drawn is that generations prior to us had very little if any competition with minority groups, and these very people still are in positions to help majority groups gain employment. Minority groups don't enjoy this benefit, so that lends even more validity to preferential interviewing.

You hold UAL as a bad example, I hold UAL as a good example. We can disagree on that point.

You're right, it's not possible to have preferential hiring without discrimination. Now it's our turn.
 
Spinup,
2 wrongs does not make a right. I am going with Ty Webb here - I don't want to see less qualified minorities be given a job over someone more deserving just to fill a quota.
 
Sorry, Spinup, but you're way off base.

Fair is Fair. You can't have it both ways. Do you want fairness? Or do you want discrimination?

To advocate preferential hiring in some attempt to "cure" past wrongs really means discriminating against white males, and that's just as wrong as discrimination against minorities.

Unfortunately, in the last ten years or so, our publicly-funded Universitities have allowed themselves to swing so far to the left on this subject that both faculty and students have lost all perspective, and this is becoming painfully clear in some of the posts I see on this board from some of the junior members.

My opinion on this subject is really one of just an objective observer- it doesn't really affect me- I have my job, thank you, but I was always taught to speak up for what is right.
 
Originally posted by flyndesk

Kid Char, it looks like you might be at JetBlue, what a great job!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A quick check of his posts reveal he is not at jetBlue. Besides, their screening process does a good job of weeding out the d!ckheads. My guess is he's either at Ryan or USA 3000.


trainerjet, flyndesk

I sure hope you are right and this idiot racist and sexist kid charlene isn't with jetblue. I would hope that Ryan and USA 3000 would've also seen through this jerk's attitude. If he decided not to apply to U that was probably a wise choice, because I'm sure they would've seen through him. It's not just flight hours that make you competitive for jobs. It seems as though he is trying to create a division between the pilots on this forum. I sure hope he doesn't succeed!! What about it kid charlene, where do you work?!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom