Lampshade
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2002
- Posts
- 485
this was actually kind of informative.
you're being sarcastic .... right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
this was actually kind of informative.
This isn't the kind of publicity that pilots want. This makes us look bad. xxxxxxx is going to all of this trouble for a few trouble makers that they really should have had Pro Stands take aside and slap upside the head.
You don't even overseas either, genius. But hey, that 321 makes you feel like a man, right? I'm guessing you're one of the 18 year FOs. The Captain probably doesn't include you in the fuel discussions because you don't have the experience to make those sorts of decisions. Why don't you just sit quietly and let the adults talk.
There is simply no data showing an effort on the East to waste fuel.
The only "data" the westholes have are fictitious webboard posts by other westholes.
Like the ones claiming someone ran an APU across the Atlantic. Or someone had an APU running with both engines....
There are operational reasons to have the APU running with both engines. For example, MELed Generator or a Bleeds off TO.
Mesa sucks?
There are operational reasons to have the APU running with both engines. For example, MELed Generator or a Bleeds off TO.
Actually, those weren't supposed to be accusations, but an example of the accusations you guys are making. Anyways, once again I can see there's not a whole lot of a chance to have a rational debate regarding it.
as to my experience....about 8 years of atlantic and pacific crossings....sooooo...ya I got some time there..
Do you know specifically everyone is running the apu across the atlantic??? hmmmm.....doubtful. haven't been on a flight yet that has intentionally wasted fuel.
Although I have seen quite a few instances of West aircraft mosey down to the last intersection, during rush hour. It seems to happen most when ATC puts one in position and tells them to be ready for an immediate, due to Airbus/757 etc on final. Seems the aircraft that just landed takes a veryyyyyyyyyy long time to clear. Could it be intentionally trying to create a go around???? Increase the burn on the east side???
Probably don't like that acusation do you guys???? And hopefully that's not the case, and it isn't that big a deal to me I don't care, and don't know as I wasn't sitting on the flight deck seeing what was going on in there. Could be anything, so unless there and actually seeing the situation or hearing, (ahhhh almost got another go around)
Then I assume there isn't any mal intent intended.
Same thing with the APU across the atlantic comment, less your sitting there and know for sure. You don't have a clue.
.