Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
- Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
- Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
- Share the passion for aviation
- Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun
put on CNN with larry king now. 2000..it is good
- Thread starter RedDogC130
- Start date
- Watchers 18
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
- Invite your friends
- Share the passion of aviation
- Friendliest aviation community on the web
sqwkvfr
Baseball junkie
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2003
- Posts
- 1,673
This isn't the kind of publicity that pilots want. This makes us look bad. xxxxxxx is going to all of this trouble for a few trouble makers that they really should have had Pro Stands take aside and slap upside the head.
Last edited by a moderator:
RedDogC130
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2005
- Posts
- 1,329
Flyingdutchman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2002
- Posts
- 1,571
RedDogC130
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2005
- Posts
- 1,329
My thoughts exactly.
Flyingdutchman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2002
- Posts
- 1,571
m80drvr
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2002
- Posts
- 429
Agreed they got and will get ALOT of play. BUT this probably was not the best time to scare pax and piss off Doug.
No it was "New JETS!"
sqwkvfr
Baseball junkie
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2003
- Posts
- 1,673
Flyingdutchman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2002
- Posts
- 1,571
If Dougweiser was ever contemplating negotiating doh for these douch bags, it's gone now. USAPA stepped in it big time and now I suspect they'll get a lesson on the importance of diplomacy.
Also, this Kate dumass is an embarassment to stupid people. She isn't qualified to utter a word regarding commercial aviation but Larry King has her on like some kind of expert. Her answers to the callers questions are so ridiculous it leaves the ATA guy virtually speachless.
She should stick to something she obviously knows.
Fake veneered teeth that look freakishly horse-like.
Also, this Kate dumass is an embarassment to stupid people. She isn't qualified to utter a word regarding commercial aviation but Larry King has her on like some kind of expert. Her answers to the callers questions are so ridiculous it leaves the ATA guy virtually speachless.
She should stick to something she obviously knows.
Fake veneered teeth that look freakishly horse-like.
Last edited:
Flyingdutchman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2002
- Posts
- 1,571
m80drvr
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2002
- Posts
- 429
Yup the coex guy did a nice job of defusing this.
8 guys get spanked for wasting fuel and usapa spends 100K+ putting an ad out that makes the company AND the industry. USAirways is DOOMED!
Way2Broke
Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2005
- Posts
- 2,882
Mod Input:
Calling anyone a Scab on here is not allowed, that does not mean that I agree with the actions of anyone, but it does mean that I have a rule to enforce, even if I may not want to. It is right there in the rules, which I did not write. I find in especially childish to call someone a scab that is not on the Scab List. Battle it out all you want, but play by the rules please. That is all I am asking. The reason we have the rules is to protect the site from liability so that it will be able to be here tomorrow for you. Please understand that I am by no means taking a side, besides that of the rules that are listed here. We have been through this type of thing before with other pilot groups as you all know, and all we ever ask is that you play by the rules. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that unions have lots of sue happy lawyers, that arn't afraid to sue the website into demise.
Here are three quotes from the rules that I think pertain here:
"NO SCAB LISTS or links to scab lists may be placed on these forums. No calling a member/non-member a scab. Violators will be permanently banned at first offense if or when the Websitemaster/moderators feel deemed."
"By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-orientated, hateful, threatening, personal attacks, personal information or otherwise violate of any laws. The owners of Flightinfo.com, LLC reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason at any time."
"If you have a thin skin, don’t post. If you do, remember that there are many diverse opinions on this board and you may well encounter a scathing attack on yours. Don’t take it too personally. Logic and a civil tone seem to work best when debating a subject and it helps you gain respect during the course of your participation on the forums."
Calling anyone a Scab on here is not allowed, that does not mean that I agree with the actions of anyone, but it does mean that I have a rule to enforce, even if I may not want to. It is right there in the rules, which I did not write. I find in especially childish to call someone a scab that is not on the Scab List. Battle it out all you want, but play by the rules please. That is all I am asking. The reason we have the rules is to protect the site from liability so that it will be able to be here tomorrow for you. Please understand that I am by no means taking a side, besides that of the rules that are listed here. We have been through this type of thing before with other pilot groups as you all know, and all we ever ask is that you play by the rules. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that unions have lots of sue happy lawyers, that arn't afraid to sue the website into demise.
Here are three quotes from the rules that I think pertain here:
"NO SCAB LISTS or links to scab lists may be placed on these forums. No calling a member/non-member a scab. Violators will be permanently banned at first offense if or when the Websitemaster/moderators feel deemed."
"By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-orientated, hateful, threatening, personal attacks, personal information or otherwise violate of any laws. The owners of Flightinfo.com, LLC reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason at any time."
"If you have a thin skin, don’t post. If you do, remember that there are many diverse opinions on this board and you may well encounter a scathing attack on yours. Don’t take it too personally. Logic and a civil tone seem to work best when debating a subject and it helps you gain respect during the course of your participation on the forums."
SkiFishFly
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2005
- Posts
- 779
Man - both those blond chicks are about as dumb as they come. Especially the fliers rights woman. Sad thing is most watchers of CNN and Larry King probably think she knows what she is talking about...
Larry King is certainly too stupid to correct her. Bet Anderson Coopers coverage is just as dumb.
You're right...but in this case...it got good publicity for what they were trying to do.
Put management's feet to the fire...
Share this page
Latest resources
-
-
-
-
-
AC 90-89C - Amateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing HandbookAmateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing Handbook
- Neal
- Updated:
