prtyprtyprncss
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
- Posts
- 156
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't call that a benefit at all. Well, maybe for you to gain seniority at my loss, but that's about it. At least a loss of aircraft/flying goes in reverse seniority order, or would you have me leave first too to protect your schedule?!?Don't forget that you are also avoiding the unknown of an assent transfer if there was no jcba. In other words, you now have much more job security. I would say that is a pretty big benefit.
On a side note, I am one of many at mesaba who is getting pretty much the same contract I have now with slight increases in work rules for line holders, and much worse for reserve rules and a little better health care while some at colgan and pinnacle are getting double digit pay raises and QOL improvements to their rules. I am just saying......what goes around comes around right?
I wouldn't call that a benefit at all. Well, maybe for you to gain seniority at my loss, but that's about it. At least a loss of aircraft/flying goes in reverse seniority order, or would you have me leave first too to protect your schedule?!?
With relative seniority he might be anyway. And from his earlier posts for a long, long time.Would you rather be an FO?
Seems either way I have the possibility to lose QOL/Pay. I will speak to my reps, hope for the best, and bid to move with the aircraft (or not) to protect MY QOL. Hope you enjoy the enhancements over TA1 that XJs entrance to this merger brought you though.With Mesaba losing the saabs and facing furloughs, would you rather not have a SLI and take your chances with your current contract language when the asset transfer happens? If there is little to no benefit to the XJ group, are you going to vote no on the TA?
It will be up to the 9 guys to figure out our new list. Lets just hope they come up with something fair. On a side note, I am one of many at mesaba who is getting pretty much the same contract I have now with slight increases in work rules for line holders, and much worse for reserve rules and a little better health care while some at colgan and pinnacle are getting double digit pay raises and QOL improvements to their rules. I am just saying......what goes around comes around right?
Seems either way I have the possibility to lose QOL/Pay. I will speak to my reps, hope for the best, and bid to move with the aircraft (or not) to protect MY QOL. Hope you enjoy the enhancements over TA1 that XJs entrance to this merger brought you though.
This is why you cannot discuss the SLI during JCBA negotiations. The contract must be fair on it's own merits. And voted in or not, on those merits. The SLI can however discuss the windfalls gained in the JCBA.
Well... I'd say were working under the same contract. I suspect the 9L guys aren't feeling so "equal" with the Saab and Q400 rates.So are you saying 9E and 9L pilots will get a better contract than XJ? Or will we be equal, and have the same pay and benefits?
9E was already GOING to get a similar contract (eventually). This JCBA did not exceed our contract requirements set by the MEC. We have what we were going to get anyways. So, I consider us equal. Which coincidentally, we are.
I'm lost. What does the "this" in your question refer to?Explain how you or your MEC are responsible for this beyond having scope in your contract? If it is only scope, that is a pretty weak argument.