Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

PDT reduce fleet, furloughs in the future.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The initial cost is as expensive, but the operating cost much less. Oh and it's bull or a miss informed bird.

Maybe ex j-41 was just fooling around, but seriously, is it that far-fetched (you guys getting some Q400s)?? what better replacement??
 
I appreciate your optimism, but there in no money for new airplanes and no real need with all the 50 seat rjs contracts in place. Mgt has even stopped dwindling the carrot.
 
During a time where the airlines are on the up and up it makes sense, but right now LCC is bleeding. The last thing they will want to do is put craploads of money into a regional aircraft. I like the piedmont dudes, and would like to see it, but I just don't see it happening. If the Q400s show up in the next year, expect it to be flown by a contactor. BTW, trust me I feel for you dudes, in the last 4 years my regional has gone from over 85 aircraft to 70, so I think I say it for most AWAC'rs, hope this is just a ploy and nothing more.
 
well for it's worth, we all seem to be bad at predicting what this company will do.

We were all freaking out that we'd lose the -300's because they were soooo expensive and in demand. The company nonchalantly gets renewals on those but then balks on the -100's??? What the hell?

Maybe, at a time when it seems most unlikely, we will actually get new airplanes. Something dramatic would have to happen at some other feed carrier, but stranger things have happened. No ill will towards Mesa of course................

What I want to know is why, all of a sudden, we are getting scheduled down to 47 lines of flying at the beginning of the freaking summer. We will have only lost 4 planes... I can't believe they are cutting the small potatoes side of the business to save money... Fing MBA's who couldn't hack it in freshman accounting class!!!
 
Typical reactionary Piedmont / USAir management. You're exactly right ZASCA. Load up with fuel hungry RJ's, and dump the props. They'll be kicking themselves once again when the economy recovers and oil hits $150 a barrell again. Typical stupid management.

In the meantime, that's seriously stupid on the part of Farrow sending out that letter. If I were still on the property, I'd be REAL motivated to do all I could to help out. Then again, you should expect no less from the destroyer commander who tried to use his boat as a landing craft....
 
Then again, you should expect no less from the destroyer commander who tried to use his boat as a landing craft....

Oh? Did Farrow actually try and beach a hull?

I am off to work tommorrow. I am totally motivated... If you get my drift.
 
Oh? Did Farrow actually try and beach a hull?

I am off to work tommorrow. I am totally motivated... If you get my drift.

I haven't been able to find the article. I think it's up for debate whether he really did it or not. He commanded the USS Elliot. Check it, you might have better luck than I did....:laugh:
 
Last edited:
BTW, trust me I feel for you dudes, in the last 4 years my regional has gone from over 85 aircraft to 70, so I think I say it for most AWAC'rs, hope this is just a ploy and nothing more.

Well ALG/PDT has gone from about 110 Planes to now maybe 45. If anyone knows about reductions it should be us.
 
Well ALG/PDT has gone from about 110 Planes to now maybe 45. If anyone knows about reductions it should be us.

Yup. What he said. All we need is some oppotunistic low rent carrier to come in here and kick us in the balls and that would make it a perfect sh1tstorm.
 
Yup. What he said. All we need is some oppotunistic low rent carrier to come in here and kick us in the balls and that would make it a perfect sh1tstorm.

Yeah I'd be worried about that. Hell that was a posibility when I was there, I'm an ex-Allegheny guy.

Its unfortunate that a carrier like Colgan, Commut Air or my favorite, frigging Chautauqua could come in and like you said, start a sh1tstorm.
 
Yup. What he said. All we need is some oppotunistic low rent carrier to come in here and kick us in the balls and that would make it a perfect sh1tstorm.

Yep, and thank God we own some planes! Wait till the leases are up at PSA on the 50 Seat RJ's.

Lets just hope this economy turns around fast.


But for now it Looks like we will be flying 45 ********************birds around until about 2014! And lets hope that the Airline industry turns around and we're not here to fly them.

Feel very sorry for those Pilots and their families that will be affected by this. This is not the time to be out of work and job hunting.
 
But for now it Looks like we will be flying 45 ********************birds around until about 2014! .

WOW, flying the Dash until 2014.

Back in 2003 the chief pilot came into class (company recurrent) and said "we're hoping to turn the Dash 8 into the next DC3, we want to fly those things until 2010"....we all looked at eachother, probably thinking, these things can't fly until 2010. Now you're saying 2014...

whatever happens, good luck, lots of good friends at PDT.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom