Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

PDT class news????

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
DATE: December 9, 2005

TO: All Employees

FROM: Steve Farrow

SUBJECT: 2006 Piedmont Fleet


We are still finalizing our 2006 budget, but we are far enough along to update you on our fleet plans for 2006. I’ll throw in the “always subject to change” caveat, but this is where we are as of today. The plan is for us to operate a fleet of 53 active D-8’s beginning in January, 2006. In terms of block hours it will be about 2% less on a monthly basis than what we are currently flying. In addition to the 53 operating aircraft, we will have 1 operational spare, 2 aircraft offline getting major maintenance checks, and at some point 1 aircraft offline being painted in the new livery. We are planning to operate at the 53 level at least until April, when we may drop down to 52, which would then be the active level for the remainder of the year. Although the overall fleet numbers are essentially constant for 2006, we will have some additions and deletions, specifically with our leased model -200’s. All of the –200 leases expire in the first half of 2006 and because of tax and other economic issues, the lessor is not interested in long term extensions for us. As the –200’s are returned, we will replace them by extending –100 leases, or with new –100 leases, often aircraft we have previously leased. I know you all appreciate the performance of the –200’s, but the economics of a small fleet at sharply higher lease rates just do not work. After the –200’s are replaced, we will have a fleet of 12 -300’s and the remainder –100’s, 32 of which are aircraft we own.

In terms of markets, the early 2006 plan is very similar to what we are flying today, with PHL, CLT and LGA markets accounting for about 80% of what we do and PIT and BOS accounting for the remainder. As changes occur, we will let you know.
 
well i guess we can always go work for mesa and fly a jet with the big boys.... LOL

opecjet, you call in sick again? if so, i got your trip from today.
 
Yeah, I've got the same crud. Coughing like you wouldn't believe.
 
mnalpha said:
i hope that email is BS.

If you're talking about my post, then I'm sorry to say that it isn't BS. This is a company memo sent out by Steve Farrow to all the stations last Friday.

The letter was a response to an inquiry I made early last week. Originally, PDT management had no plans of disclosing this information to the pilot group, but once the union got involved and the company found out my source of the initial rumor, they then decided to send out a letter.

It sucks. It has sucked for awhile now, and it would be nice one day to hear some good news.
 
Seeing that we are loosing A/C, guess that Colga is going to be around longer than expected and/or we are not picking up thier flying!
 
Picking up Colgans flying was just another rumor.

As far as going somewhere with 6 yrs of Dash right seat time, it'll take you the same places 6 years of right seat jet time will..... Nowhere, but at least I can look myself in the mirror knowing I'm not undercutting someone else's flying. I don't say that as a jab against you or any particular pilot group by the way, just the way I see it. The PDT pilots have been on the receiving end of a lot of that.

It also pays the bills and pads the logbook for the corporate job I hope to find closer to home.... Eventually.
 
looks like it's time to get the resume together! I can't believe this Sh!t!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom