Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Ouch!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I would dare you to compare with a good part 91 operator. You will most likely walk away like a dog between it's tail. Not to mention QOL issues.

Lets see have a friend at GM flying the same equipment, not close to the money I am making. As a matter of fact, I havent met a single corporate guy in my equipment making close to what I am, let alone only working 12 days a month. My tail is fine.
 
Lets see have a friend at GM flying the same equipment, not close to the money I am making. As a matter of fact, I havent met a single corporate guy in my equipment making close to what I am, let alone only working 12 days a month. My tail is fine.

Well if you read my post again, I said a good 91 operator. I would not call GM a good operator. I have heard stories about them and they are not much better than some 135 operators.

You are not talking to the right people because they are out there.
 
All I hear is ME,ME,ME.

When you can spell TEAM without an I grasshopper, Then you will know the meaning of a pilots life.


Did someone say AssMonkey?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom