hedging should be allowed only if you plan on taking delivery of the commodity--- if you don't plan on using it, you shouldn't be allowed to drive the price of it.
Who is going to enforce this? Assuming it's enforceable at all? This would be only a temporary fix. The United States does not have a monopoly on futures contracts. Institutions/people would simply setup markets for them overseas. This would be bad because it will shift capital away from this coutry which hurts all of us.
You want a "excise profits tax"...yet another good idea...keep taxing Exxon everytime they make "too much" money. There are several problems with this...
1st, it removes the incenvtive for Exxon, Chevron, etc. to invest in their businesses which is what we NEED them to do when oil is at $100/barrell if there is to be any hope of us having cheaper gas. We want these companies drilling all the rights that we have given them...and now. We threaten to take away whatever profits they make everytime the price of oil spikes...and yet, we are surprised to watch 60 minutes and learn that these oil companies have large amounts of drilling rights that they are not using. Instead they are investing in Saudi Arabia and Canada and South America and Africa. So demand from Asia continues to rise but one of the largest oil producing countries in the world (1.Russia, 2.Saudi,
3.USA) puts a damper on its production SENDING PRICES EVEN HIGHER. WHAT A BUNCH OF GENIUSES.
2nd, it is too easy for Exxon, etc. to usurp. If I can think of how to usurp these laws - I know they have thought of it to. If i'm Exxon I move my headquarters to a more business friendly country...say Singapore. I then spin off a US distribution company and headquarter it in Houston. My Singapore company is not traded in the Untied States at all. I enter into a 99 year exclusive distribution agreement with my distribution company. They only buy from me and they make very little money doing it.
3rd, we send a signal to all other current and future companies that there is yet ANOTHER reason to avoid doing business in the United States.
Finally, we are a country that became the largest economy in the world because we were the free market of the world. We don't have an exclusive on this any longer. Shouldn't we stop biting the hand that has fed us.
This is the same thinking that has gotten us to where we are in manufacturing. It is more profitable to ship materials half way around the world, manufacture them, and then ship them half way around the world again to be sold in a store cheaper than the same product made across the street. Yeah, right it's those greedy corporations, it has nothing to do with the tax and labor laws of this country.
Nobody wants to tell the American people the truth. You do have a choice you either can't afford the Hummer, need to buy more fuel efficient cars; take the time to insulate your homes, maybe a family of 4 doesn't need 2500/sf of climate controlled living space; OR you relax environmental regulations and let the companies drill (i.e. ANWR) and build more refineries. But you CANNOT have it both ways as our politicians would have you believe. All of there solutions are almost always temporary and simply kick the can down the road to the next guy.
The market speaks through prices...$100/barrell oil is the market screaming USE LESS/DRILL MORE <----sorry, but these are the ONLY two choices that can effect prices long term and any solution not consisting of some combination of ONLY these two things are politicians simply playing to their populist constituents and dangerous.