No soup for you....says JetBlue....

[Smarta$$]

United and Delta both pay separate pay rates for different gauges of the same type. The two biggest airlines in the US. No mandate huh?

So you are wrong in your spewing.

Later....

Delta actually pays LESS on the MD88-MD90 than they do on the A319,A320 and 737-700, even thought the MD88-90 have MORE seats.

Maybe you are confused by the word mandate. As I have said before (which is why you didn't use the quote feature, because you want to argue what you THINK I said, and not what I ACTUALLY said), some airlines pay more for a common stretched type, some/most do not. There are more examples of common pay then there are more pay.

Even if you were correct, which you are not, the question still remains of HOW to allocate that additional pay moneys, and an override for a small group of 321 pilots, is not the best way, especially since we are ALL so far behind in most/all compensation areas.

It is a matter of priorities and allocation, and you are on the wrong side of both.

 

[Splert]

Whatever it was, it was NOT a pay override or pay rate for just a small number of airplanes. Wow, what a coincidence, that is exactly what I have been suggesting.... Improve our OVERALL comp package, not just a pay raise for small group of pilots....

Your arguments have been an epic failure, how embarrassing.

Stay on point.

Did SWAPA get more or less?

Did pilots hurt the 'balance sheet' (that is still funny)?

 

[Smarta$$]

Stay on point.

Did SWAPA get more or less?

Did pilots hurt the 'balance sheet' (that is still funny)?

1. Stay on point Slert, did they, or did they NOT create a separate pay rate for a minority of pilots?

2. You mentioned the balance sheet again, please quote my post, unedited, and explain exactly how you think I confused expenses with the balance sheet. Be very specific. Saying I had the two in the same paragraph only embarrasses yourself.

 

[Splert]

Your answer to a direct question is to ask another question.

You linked pilot costs to apparently me not bring concerned about the balance sheet.

Now just say you goofed and move on.

 

[Smarta$$]

Your answer to a direct question is to ask another question.

You linked pilot costs to apparently me not bring concerned about the balance sheet.

Now just say you goofed and move on.

I asked you to quote my post, unedited, and draw a straight line to me implying costs were on a balance sheet. You did not. Sticking with your "same paragraph" theory. You are a joke.

But if you want to be a toolbag about it, permanently raising your expenses negatively affects all FUTURE balance sheets as the company will bank less cash and pay off less debt over time. And don't tell me about additional revenue. If additional revenue was available and they capitalized on it, they would still have a weaker FUTURE balance sheet compared to what they would have had with their previous lower costs.

Either way, you are making desperate arguments and wasting our time.

 

[Splert]

Your quote is already on this thread.

Now you are back to pilots should fund growth.

Okay!!!

 

[B190Captain]

Why are you guys bickering on this board about this for everyone else to see? Geezus .. shut up! Embarrassing.

Fill out a card and send it in.

 

[$$$4nothin]

Why are you guys bickering on this board about this for everyone else to see? Geezus .. shut up! Embarrassing.

Fill out a card and send it in.

+1 on both accounts

 

[B6Driver]

Oh so true.

Why are you guys bickering on this board about this for everyone else to see? Geezus .. shut up! Embarrassing.

Fill out a card and send it in.

No one else gives a crap. Embarrassing for sure.:bomb:

 

[APFPilot]

DL will have a new contract before they get the A321 but I wonder how they'll handle pay on the large a/c