coogebeachhotel
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2005
- Posts
- 651
You are such an incredible tool. 30 of the next 90 Airbus deliveries will be 321s. If you are insisting otherwise, you are either making crap up or releasing sensitive non-public company information.
I don't give a crap about the company data on 321 pay. I have seen biased info and data from the PVC as well. I care about the totality of data, and it clearly shows no industry mandate for a separate pay rate for a stretched common type (A319-320-321, 737-700-800-900 etc...). Some due pay an override, more than half or even most don't.
Even if the data was slightly in favor of an override, which it is not, I would say fine, ask for an override as priority number 17, behind overall pay, retirement, healthcare, disability, work rules, international override, rigs, scope, career protections etc..... You know, things that ALL JB pilots NEED!
There is a separate pay rate for stretched common type. CAL? Hello.
So from an economic stand point. More seats=More revenue. We can all agree on that.
Should we not capture some of that increased revenue? Does management not receive bonuses based on increased financial performance?
Where does all the low self esteem come from?