You assume that just because most people aren't willing to screw themselves by attempting to screw the company that they don't want the contract to be completed. I want nothing more than the contract to be settled, and to move on. What I am not willing to do is run the company into the ground in the process. It is lunacy to think that the company will be somehow driven to pay us more if we cost them more. Stupid beyond belief!
Alot of people are doing things online to help the cause and I have yet to hear about anyone getting screwed by the company; have you? It's not like it takes much effort to completely disrupt the operation.
The company wants this contract settled so Jerry can tell any new business out there that the costs are known. Right now, the costs are a big ole' question mark, because both the company and the union are at the mercy of the mediation board. The company does not like being in this position, and that in itself is enough to push them to get this contract settled.
Jerry can tell new business he has fixed costs for as long as he wants. He knows the NMB will drag out the process as long as he wants or needs to keep the business running. I think you put way too much hope that the NMB will bring us to closure anytime soon.
Let us play a hypothetical, with a few assumptions:
Assumption 1: Jerry Atkin will shrink the company if our costs are too high.
Assumption 2: If the contract is settled at the union proposal the costs will be too high.
Given those assumptions, the company would be ethically bound to attempt to get the rates down to an acceptable level. The management has the responsibility to protect the livelihood of each of the employees, and if they sign off on a contract that they truly believe will cause ASA to shrink, they would be doing something morally reprehensible.
I don't think our management believe that is part of their responsibility. Their job is to maximize profits while doing just enough for their employees (pay/benefits) to stay operational. I don't believe any "moral" tests are being applied during the operation of the business including negotations.
(That being said, I think it is morally reprehensible for our pilot group to do anything (such as illegal job actions) to cost the company money, and to jeaopardize the remaining employee's jobs. But that's for another post.)
Luckily for you and I, there are a few people out there that disagree with you.
So there you have it. I believe that we should do the best job we can, make the most money we can for the company in the most efficient way possible. Basically, we should do our jobs, and continue the negotiation process until it is complete. At least then I can shave in the morning...and sleep at night.