Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NJA size

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hmmm. Good info, but I suspect management knows the comparative costs. Interesting thoughts, though.
I'd love to see the numbers but I don't think it could be that significant.

I'd rather take a pay cut than trade scope. But I am not doing that either. I am just saying... Scope is our jobs.
 
Last edited:
I'd say not a chance.. Outta of the throngs of "leaders" I've seen come and go over the last decade. Hansell is by far the worst leader. The guy is basically non-exhistant.


Sokol was probably a better leader than Hansell, but Sokol was definitely the most arrogant and detrimental to an operation. He had no clue what to do with a high end luxury business utilizing airplanes as the product.

It's sad that the two worst executives I've ever seen in aviation had to happen to NJA back to back. They made executives at regionals actually look pretty good!!

IMO Hansell will be done shortly. (by shortly I hope within 1-1.5 years. If not sooner)

Naa

Attorney man is around for the long haul. He would have already been gone if that was the plan. He is toting the Sokol line.
 
I'd love to see the numbers but I don't think it could be that significant.

I'd rather take a pay cut than trade scope. But I am not doing that either. I am just saying... Scope is our jobs.

I'd rather have a pay freeze and not trade scope...if it came to that...

I hear what you're saying though.
 
I think he is around as long as he can continue to squeeze money/ and/ or concessions from the union contact without the troops rallying to stop him. Every time a case goes to arbitration there is a good chance we will lose a part of what we fought for before since the arbitrator can split the difference. All Hansell has to do is continue to break the contact to take little pieces here and there. He will only stop when we stop him. I'm doing my part. Bring your fine toothed comb to go over your airplanes with. Don't fly tired. Follow your brief exactly without offering any help when you see the train wreck coming. If we all do these things WB will notice and Hansell will no longer be a usefull tool. Maybe then WB will decide to bring in a leader to move forward once there is nothing left to squeeze out.
 
I think he is around as long as he can continue to squeeze money/ and/ or concessions from the union contact without the troops rallying to stop him. Every time a case goes to arbitration there is a good chance we will lose a part of what we fought for before since the arbitrator can split the difference. All Hansell has to do is continue to break the contact to take little pieces here and there. He will only stop when we stop him. I'm doing my part. Bring your fine toothed comb to go over your airplanes with. Don't fly tired. Follow your brief exactly without offering any help when you see the train wreck coming. If we all do these things WB will notice and Hansell will no longer be a usefull tool. Maybe then WB will decide to bring in a leader to move forward once there is nothing left to squeeze out.

Me and my colleagues at the former NJI will fight you tooth and nail if you try this nonsense, especially during these precarious economic times. That is a promise. We will fly overtime, volunteer to help out the company, and do whatever we can to minimize the damage. Enough of this nonsense. If you don't like your job, quit.
 
I'd love to see the numbers but I don't think it could be that significant.

I'd rather take a pay cut than trade scope. But I am not doing that either. I am just saying... Scope is our jobs.

This scope thing must be a bigger issue than I thought. Aren't we just discussing a few more days available in a busy quarter to broker out trips?
 
That "scope thing" is the glue that holds the whole shebang together. Without it you have a stack of paper that doesn't amount to a hill of beans. Just ask the old timers who worked under the '97 contract. You have a few in the G fleet.
 
Who will notice -- the owners

If we all do these things WB will notice

and so will the owners.

FYI -- I know morale is down. Management is mostly responsible for this. But owners are noticing the lack of morale and at the end of the day, no longer care as much as they used to nor do they care who is to blame. Owners will continue to leave for other providers and this is not in the long term best interest of NJ pilots nor management. But at the end of the day, when business is gone, does it really matter who is to blame??
 

Latest resources

Back
Top