Willy21
Don't ask
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2005
- Posts
- 522
I'm hearing the same thing from decent sources.
Any chance you will expand on what you source said?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm hearing the same thing from decent sources.
Any chance you will expand on what you source said?
any chance that the folks that are paid 1.6 % out of every pilots pocket will some day communicate??
Wow, how inspiring!
I don't think anyone here supports the last management regime's decision to hire folks away from stable employment.
Pilot staffing is indeed in the contract. Just not the CBA, but rather our owner contracts. Wrong again.
Pilot staffing is governed by the work rules in the contract and not just by some whimsical hiring projection. It's done by cold hard facts.
NJ is by far, the highest pilot per airframe in the fractional industry. NJ managment had to hire pilots that no other fractional would have based on contract rules.
The additional pilots pulled away from stable employment was based on the contract vs. projected flying. As a result, NJ was "fat" by hundreds of pilots and most importantly, could not cut back because of the contract.
Now it's all coming home to roost... don't blame management, blame the inability of the NJ to adjust as a result of the union contract. These furloughs are union related, not the result of poor management by the company. Place the proper blame where it belongs.
Union 101. Squeeze the golden goose till it can no longer lay eggs.
You appear to be forgetting the years of 150 million dollar profits after this contract was signed.
Wrong again B19.Pilot staffing is governed by the work rules in the contract and not just by some whimsical hiring projection. It's done by cold hard facts.
NJ is by far, the highest pilot per airframe in the fractional industry. NJ managment had to hire pilots that no other fractional would have based on contract rules.
The additional pilots pulled away from stable employment was based on the contract vs. projected flying. As a result, NJ was "fat" by hundreds of pilots and most importantly, could not cut back because of the contract.
Now it's all coming home to roost... don't blame management, blame the inability of the NJ to adjust as a result of the union contract. These furloughs are union related, not the result of poor management by the company. Place the proper blame where it belongs.
Union 101. Squeeze the golden goose till it can no longer lay eggs.
Wrong again B19.
The only thing in the CBA that governs staffing levels at NetJets is 5 pilots per airplane (which I HIGHLY doubt the company could function at that low staffing level.)
The company can hire or furlough at will. Nothing the union can do about it. If you're going to spew crap like you're an authority, at least do your homework so you don't look foolish.
Butt handed to you.
When you are in a hole, stop digging!
In case you haven't notice, you are trying to lead, but nobody is following.
The only thing in the CBA that governs staffing levels at NetJets is 5 pilots per airplane (which I HIGHLY doubt the company could function at that low staffing level.)
.
I'm just stating facts. I realize the truth is not common on FI.com. If you don't like it, feel free to put me on your ignore list.When you are in a hole, stop digging!
In case you haven't notice, you are trying to lead, but nobody is following.