Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh, sorry dude. We already have 3 different suffixes (N***JQ) for our newest airframes on the Airways side. Pretty hard to tie different "N" numbers into a vast conspiracy.... but whatever makes you tickjetnut said:http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=670117&WxsIERv=RW1icmFlciBFUkotMTcwLTEwMA%3D%3D&WdsYXMg=VW5pdGVkIEV4cHJlc3MgKENoYXV0YXVxdWEgQWlybGluZXMp&QtODMg=U2FvIEpvc2UgZG9zIENhbXBvcyAoU0pLIC8gU0JTSik%3D&ERDLTkt=QnJhemls&ktODMp=U2VwdGVtYmVyIDIyLCAyMDA0&BP=1&WNEb25u=I think this might work to look at. it shows a picture of a 170 (REP) in united colors and the N# is N631RW. That is not a RP N#. Why would CHQ have 3 types of #'s. The plot thickens
tscarecrow, now that was funny, I giggled to my self the entire time I was brushing my teeth through my little fart hole. Mind you I must admit I was a little giddy from losing sleep due to the thought given the toothpaste conundrum! I am sorry for calling you a d1ckwad, and I hope that I didn't not make you sad. I guess I was just lashing out with pent up aggression from having a repressed childhood and spending to much time near spinning propellers.tscarecrow said:See, sarcasm CAN work if used properly. Take notes.
Were you reading my post through the hole you farted in you underpants or something?
Just don't drop by my house unannounced and you'll be fine.tyuwerty said:I don't want to get you mad though and pull that "9"
1-for-1?? Jeez, even I would find that to be unacceptable. 1-for-9, maybe, even DOH... But 1-for-1 would put ALL our pilots in the top 200-or-so on their list.tyuwerty said:Besides we have much more important things to discuss, things we can actually affect. Weren't we originally talking about mass conspiracy, new CEO's, 1 for 1 seniority lists, and 170's on the property?
I agree, but I doubt for the same reason as you.KingAirer said:This is getting out of hand.