New CEO @ Shuttle America

[BendOverAgain?]

Lets not forget that Republik/CHQ derived no benefit whatsoever by having SA fly the Saabs. It did not help them improve their bottom line nor their marketability for the IPO in the least bit, did it?

But then again, we are getting ahead of ourselves aren't we.

Bull..

Look at the real facts. CHQ was loosing money on the Saabs and stuck in a long term lease and that wouldn't look good for an IPO. SA sub-leased ALL the Saabs paying CHQ to cover their long term leases, flying approx. 14 and parking around 10 absorbing CHQ's debt on them (10 parked partly due to not enough flying for them and the rest was because CHQ only pencil whipped the books and did no real maintenance on any of them after they knew they were getting rid of them so several weren't even airworthy/safe or legal to fly!).

SA absorbed CHQ's garbage to make them look good for the IPO and has now turned the a/c around and is making money with them.

 

[tyuwerty]

OK!
sar·casm 1. A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound. 2. A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.

(Note to self #2: sarcasm not communicated effectively through the written word. Avoid it in future writing)

I am with you on this one BENDER. Of course SA helped the bottom line and the IPO. Only a fool could think otherwise.

 

[I.P. Freley]

I applaud you on using Bongo from "Life in Hell" as your avatar, tyuwerty. I used to think that LIH was only applicable to working in an office, but then...

 

[Indypilot]

Ok sort of off topic here, but let me see if I can get this straight.

Republic - doesn't have certificate yet
CHQ - If they fly the 170, they will probably lose the AA flying
SA - Possible addition, only paperwork hasn't been started yet

Aren't these things suppost to be flying by the middle of Oct?

What kind of rabbit is wexford pulling out of it's hat to make this work?

 

[tyuwerty]

or a sim, IP.

I don't want to get you mad though and pull that "9"

 

[tscarecrow]

OK!
sar·casm 1. A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound. 2. A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.

Hey dictionary man are you the same douchebag that so graciously gave us the definition of 'slander' the other day on the company website? If so you are one sad individual.

 

[tyuwerty]

Hey dictionary man are you the same douchebag that so graciously gave us the definition of 'slander' the other day on the company website? If so you are one sad individual.

"Hey d!ckwad dont b accusin" I can most certainly guarantee that I am not the same individual. I did read them, and I thought the definition thing a cool and funny way to get a point across. Take a look at my posts, you'll see that I always come down on the side of the SA guys not attacking them.

 

[tyuwerty]

Hey tscarecrow. I just had a look at the website the you refer to. Looks like "the poster" was active again yesterday. Hmmm, and there is only a couple of minutes difference between your post last night and the one on that board. Intersting isn't it????

 

[tscarecrow]

Hey tscarecrow. I just had a look at the website the you refer to. Looks like "the poster" was active again yesterday. Hmmm, and there is only a couple of minutes difference between your post last night and the one on that board. Intersting isn't it????

Boy you got me detective. I beg you not to place my friends and loved ones in jeopardy by revealing my secret identity to all. As if anyone gives a... whatever.

See, sarcasm CAN work if used properly. Take notes.

Were you reading my post through the hole you farted in you underpants or something? Note that the hurtful badnames I used were only meant to make you feel sad if you are indeed the Dictionary Douchebag. Being the amateur detective that you clearly are, you have to admit the coincidence is too great to ignore. I for one am not entirely convinced. Not that it matters. Unlike you I don't know who the hell I am talking to. I may be wrong, but hey I reserve that right.

What am I doing? It's my day off!!!

 

[jetnut]

http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=670117&WxsIERv=RW1icmFlciBFUkotMTcwLTEwMA%3D%3D&WdsYXMg=VW5pdGVkIEV4cHJlc3MgKENoYXV0YXVxdWEgQWlybGluZXMp&QtODMg=U2FvIEpvc2UgZG9zIENhbXBvcyAoU0pLIC8gU0JTSik%3D&ERDLTkt=QnJhemls&ktODMp=U2VwdGVtYmVyIDIyLCAyMDA0&BP=1&WNEb25u=I think this might work to look at. it shows a picture of a 170 (REP) in united colors and the N# is N631RW. That is not a RP N#. Why would CHQ have 3 types of #'s. The plot thickens

 

[jetnut]

tyuwerty That was to much alike. Just like OJ Do you have a white bronco?

 

[SF340Guy]

Here is the web link that proves that our new CEO is infact listed as president of Republic Airlines: http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/certific/certlist.pdf

More fuel for the fire!!!

 

[jterj145]

http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=670117&WxsIERv=RW1icmFlciBFUkotMTcwLTEwMA%3D%3D&WdsYXMg=VW5pdGVkIEV4cHJlc3MgKENoYXV0YXVxdWEgQWlybGluZXMp&QtODMg=U2FvIEpvc2UgZG9zIENhbXBvcyAoU0pLIC8gU0JTSik%3D&ERDLTkt=QnJhemls&ktODMp=U2VwdGVtYmVyIDIyLCAyMDA0&BP=1&WNEb25u=I think this might work to look at. it shows a picture of a 170 (REP) in united colors and the N# is N631RW. That is not a RP N#. Why would CHQ have 3 types of #'s. The plot thickens

Uh, sorry dude. We already have 3 different suffixes (N***JQ) for our newest airframes on the Airways side. Pretty hard to tie different "N" numbers into a vast conspiracy.... but whatever makes you tick

 

[tyuwerty]

See, sarcasm CAN work if used properly. Take notes.

Were you reading my post through the hole you farted in you underpants or something?

tscarecrow, now that was funny, I giggled to my self the entire time I was brushing my teeth through my little fart hole. Mind you I must admit I was a little giddy from losing sleep due to the thought given the toothpaste conundrum! I am sorry for calling you a d1ckwad, and I hope that I didn't not make you sad. I guess I was just lashing out with pent up aggression from having a repressed childhood and spending to much time near spinning propellers.

Lets us look at this logically if we shall. An anonymous poster defending innocence regarding anonymous hijacked posts on a different board to a bunch of anonymous posters on an anonymous posting board (I like the word anonymous for some reason today). Your a smart guy, (I can tell with all the thought you give to physics), does the incongruity of the situation strike you as amusing? If it was me, analytically speaking of course, what would stop me from confessing my sins? Nothing I tell you. I would fess up, get a big belly laugh out of the whole thing, change my name and post again 10 minutes later.

I have not done that, so therefore, "if d' glove don't fit you must acquit".

Besides we have much more important things to discuss, things we can actually affect. Weren't we originally talking about mass conspiracy, new CEO's, 1 for 1 seniority lists, and 170's on the property?

 

[I.P. Freley]

I don't want to get you mad though and pull that "9"

Just don't drop by my house unannounced and you'll be fine.

 

[I.P. Freley]

Besides we have much more important things to discuss, things we can actually affect. Weren't we originally talking about mass conspiracy, new CEO's, 1 for 1 seniority lists, and 170's on the property?

1-for-1?? Jeez, even I would find that to be unacceptable. 1-for-9, maybe, even DOH... But 1-for-1 would put ALL our pilots in the top 200-or-so on their list.

 

[KingAirer]

This is getting out of hand.

 

[tyuwerty]

Meant DOH, please accept my apologies.

 

[I.P. Freley]

This is getting out of hand.

I agree, but I doubt for the same reason as you.

 

[KingAirer]

I just think this Finfo Rumor is funny how its grown, from a CEO to Shuttle getting the 170s, to 1 for 9's etc etc.....Who knows, a merger, Sr list included may be the best thing for both pilot groups. Then we couldnt be used against one another, this is one of the main reasons i think it wont happen. But again, we are way ahead of ourselves.