New CEO @ Shuttle America

[jetnut]

tyuwerty That was to much alike. Just like OJ Do you have a white bronco?

 

[SF340Guy]

Here is the web link that proves that our new CEO is infact listed as president of Republic Airlines: http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/certific/certlist.pdf

More fuel for the fire!!!

 

[jterj145]

http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=670117&WxsIERv=RW1icmFlciBFUkotMTcwLTEwMA%3D%3D&WdsYXMg=VW5pdGVkIEV4cHJlc3MgKENoYXV0YXVxdWEgQWlybGluZXMp&QtODMg=U2FvIEpvc2UgZG9zIENhbXBvcyAoU0pLIC8gU0JTSik%3D&ERDLTkt=QnJhemls&ktODMp=U2VwdGVtYmVyIDIyLCAyMDA0&BP=1&WNEb25u=I think this might work to look at. it shows a picture of a 170 (REP) in united colors and the N# is N631RW. That is not a RP N#. Why would CHQ have 3 types of #'s. The plot thickens

Uh, sorry dude. We already have 3 different suffixes (N***JQ) for our newest airframes on the Airways side. Pretty hard to tie different "N" numbers into a vast conspiracy.... but whatever makes you tick

 

[tyuwerty]

See, sarcasm CAN work if used properly. Take notes.

Were you reading my post through the hole you farted in you underpants or something?

tscarecrow, now that was funny, I giggled to my self the entire time I was brushing my teeth through my little fart hole. Mind you I must admit I was a little giddy from losing sleep due to the thought given the toothpaste conundrum! I am sorry for calling you a d1ckwad, and I hope that I didn't not make you sad. I guess I was just lashing out with pent up aggression from having a repressed childhood and spending to much time near spinning propellers.

Lets us look at this logically if we shall. An anonymous poster defending innocence regarding anonymous hijacked posts on a different board to a bunch of anonymous posters on an anonymous posting board (I like the word anonymous for some reason today). Your a smart guy, (I can tell with all the thought you give to physics), does the incongruity of the situation strike you as amusing? If it was me, analytically speaking of course, what would stop me from confessing my sins? Nothing I tell you. I would fess up, get a big belly laugh out of the whole thing, change my name and post again 10 minutes later.

I have not done that, so therefore, "if d' glove don't fit you must acquit".

Besides we have much more important things to discuss, things we can actually affect. Weren't we originally talking about mass conspiracy, new CEO's, 1 for 1 seniority lists, and 170's on the property?

 

[I.P. Freley]

I don't want to get you mad though and pull that "9"

Just don't drop by my house unannounced and you'll be fine.

 

[I.P. Freley]

Besides we have much more important things to discuss, things we can actually affect. Weren't we originally talking about mass conspiracy, new CEO's, 1 for 1 seniority lists, and 170's on the property?

1-for-1?? Jeez, even I would find that to be unacceptable. 1-for-9, maybe, even DOH... But 1-for-1 would put ALL our pilots in the top 200-or-so on their list.

 

[KingAirer]

This is getting out of hand.

 

[tyuwerty]

Meant DOH, please accept my apologies.

 

[I.P. Freley]

This is getting out of hand.

I agree, but I doubt for the same reason as you.

 

[KingAirer]

I just think this Finfo Rumor is funny how its grown, from a CEO to Shuttle getting the 170s, to 1 for 9's etc etc.....Who knows, a merger, Sr list included may be the best thing for both pilot groups. Then we couldnt be used against one another, this is one of the main reasons i think it wont happen. But again, we are way ahead of ourselves.

 

[DX Rick]

I saw one of your Saabs yesterday in DAY. Nice paint job. That U makes the tail look huge.
Ok, I'm done High Jacking

 

[I.P. Freley]

But again, we are way ahead of ourselves.

I couldn't disagree more. How far ahead of ourselves are we, exactly, when he who is listed in an FAA document as the CEO of Republic Airlines is, mysteriously, now OUR CEO?

FWIW, the rumor appears to be getting more airtime on flightinfo.com than it's getting on the line. Mostly there's a bunch of head-scratching about "what it all means", and concern that this COULD be (more) bad news for us. I mentioned 1-for-9 since you're roughly 9 times larger than we are, and it's just an idea for integration if there WERE to be some sort of buyout/merger/acquisition/(insert euphemism here).

We certainly don't want that euphemism to be "after all you've sacrificed, after all the hard work you've put in over the last few years, after you've served your purpose... you're all fired, or if you're lucky, the bottom 10% of the new improved Chapublic".

Do you not understand why there is some concern or some low-level rumormongering going on? We could use some good news around here, and something more firm than 10 more months of U flying would be a welcome piece of news.

 

[jetnut]

Well we have to enjoy all of the posts from our new fearless leader... He is probably laughing at all of us. well hmmm I still feel the same as the last CEO. uninformed. how many days has it been and what have we heard? This crack is some good SH1T...

 

[KingAirer]

I couldn't disagree more. How far ahead of ourselves are we, exactly, when he who is listed in an FAA document as the CEO of Republic Airlines is, mysteriously, now OUR CEO?

FWIW, the rumor appears to be getting more airtime on flightinfo.com than it's getting on the line. Mostly there's a bunch of head-scratching about "what it all means", and concern that this COULD be (more) bad news for us. I mentioned 1-for-9 since you're roughly 9 times larger than we are, and it's just an idea for integration if there WERE to be some sort of buyout/merger/acquisition/(insert euphemism here).

We certainly don't want that euphemism to be "after all you've sacrificed, after all the hard work you've put in over the last few years, after you've served your purpose... you're all fired, or if you're lucky, the bottom 10% of the new improved Chapublic".

Do you not understand why there is some concern or some low-level rumormongering going on? We could use some good news around here, and something more firm than 10 more months of U flying would be a welcome piece of news.

Ok, So what are you guys hoping comes out of this? What do you think, best case scenario for you, that this info means?

 

[efiscompmon]

While it would be nice to fly the brazillian double-wide, I think it is more likely that we will not be seeing them.

I think that our ex-CEO is pursuing other opportunities (selling peanuts at a nascar event, one can only hope) as he realized that there is nothing on the horizon for us. Wexie doesn't want to front the $$$ for us to get our own jets, United wanted all props gone back in 2000--why would they keep us once they emerge from BK?

We got someone from the CHQ/RP family to run us because we will be winding down--why do an executive search if the end is near? One letter difference on a tail number is probably less significant than the lack of op specs and training and pilots at SA for a plane that it already built.

I have certainly been wrong before, however.