Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
No, I'm just tired of arguing, especially when half your assertions are just plain wrong, SB.Cruncher, Lear wants no part of facts such as NC notes detailing the 717 would go away early rather than later and his MEC was the side that brought it up. He wants no part of discussions that their seniority over time is within tenths of a percent of pre-purchase announcements.
Cruncher's numbers take AAI retirements into account, but they don't take into account the SWA pilots who will retire before 1/1/15, which changes where the 50% mark will fall on that date and, whereby, the AirTran pilots will fit into the mix.
On 1/1/15, with the 717's now going away, 373 FAT pilots will still be F/O's but can hold CA by seniority. That number was vetted on both sides (ALPA & SWAPA) during negotiations; it played a pivotal role in a LOT of conversations on several different dates.
That aside, not sure what point you're trying to make, but the simple fact is that those CA seats were supposed to be protected by the deal we made. And now they're not. So we're grieving it. Not really much else to talk about until the grievance is done and, as I said before, I'm kind of worn out talking 5 ways around the same subject, so I'm simply going to say that I'm done debating this issue, I wish all of us well coming out the other side of this, and just because I'm not responding doesn't mean I agree with you or that I don't have an argument to counter with, I just don't think it's productive anymore.
I'm appreciative of those of you who have reached out and let me know that at least SOME of what I said helps you put things in perspective from our side of the fence, even if you don't agree with it; not much else I could ask for, and I hope to buy you guys a frosty one on the overnight sometime.
That's it. I'll let you guys have the last word on it. Cheers! :beer:
Last edited: