X-rated
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2005
- Posts
- 498
NJAOwner may be right, but these "results" may be shortsighted. Today I had in in depth conversation with a large share holder. He was really disappointed with the interior of the C350, with the exception of the galley. Ultimately he's saying goodbye to his large cabin share (he loves Gulfstream products and was reading the FT bombardier article today), and keeping is XL share for short hops.
Which aircraft actually contribute more to the bottom line again? Guess BRK should look at the results again and perhaps they'd see that the reduction injecting owner expectations will ultimately hurt their "current" bottom line numbers.
I totally understand your point but look at the numbers. In the first 13 or 14 years after BRK purchased NetJets, when you all say you were giving best in class service and had happy owners, you returned virtually nothing back BRK on their investment. Now you say Netjets is wildly profitable at the same time you say JH and WB are ruining the company. There is a bit of a disconnect there. Look, I want First Class service when I travel on SWA and don't want to see any perks taken away. That doesn't necessarily mean I'm willing to pay for them at any cost. NetJets' owners deserve the best service you can give them, but there are financial realities to running a business. Be happy your company is now generating significant profit and should be in a position to increase your wages. It doesn't matter how happy your owners are if that doesn't eventually translate into money on the bottom line.
I'm not saying you shouldn't picket nor put out union position adds. You should. But don't get carried away and think you're putting the screws to Warren. You're at best a mild irritant and a small blip in his day.
Last edited: