Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Netjets TA falls apart!!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Wtfo!!???

This should be good, any details???
 
be-400xpdriver said:
He backed out on the NJI part of the TA.

Boy, I never saw that one coming...:rolleyes: See below, if what your saying is true I was only off by 3 years. Just three years SOONER than I predicted... It's almost as if I was actually at the meeting.

h25b said:
I'm guessing it was something along the lines of, "don't sweat it, we strung those guys (read: IBT) along for years and it'll be a LONG time (read: forever) before you'll start paying union dues. So just do business as usual and we'll figure out a way to weasel out of the NJI provisions of this TA well before any of you start wearing those goofy union pins... We're just hoping they don't come to their senses and reject this TA because we really feel like we got away with murder... The only downside is Mr. Buffett is pi$$ed that we didn't break the IBT, but we never thought they'd actually accept this B.S."

That had to be about the gist of it, probably lasted about 5 minutes before they all hit the lunch buffet. He probably gave the NJI guys a raise just for spite.
 
Last edited:
be-400xpdriver said:
He backed out on the NJI part of the TA.

Very odd that he would pass-up an opportunity to reduce redundant costs (e.g., overhead). Look forward to hear more about the rationale for this... Not a good situation...
 
On Your Six said:
Very odd that he would pass-up an opportunity to reduce redundant costs (e.g., overhead). Look forward to hear more about the rationale for this... Not a good situation...

Money well spent, at least in Warren Buffett's mind...
 
h25b said:
Money well spent, at least in Warren Buffett's mind...

Good way to create more division in the company (didn't think that was possible). These managers are clearly inept. Who do you want to upset more, the NJI minority or the NJA majority? Well, I guess you can't have it all....
 
Can we get some actual details here as to what is going on over there? It isn't very clear to those of us on the outside looking in. Did the company back out of the TA or only some part of it that pertains to NJI? Info please!
 
Details are that Management wont agree to terms reference NJI that were agreed to last week. Expects anyone flying for NJI to waive his right to Union protection. IE FIRED AT WILL OF NJI....

What does this mean?


DEAL BREAKER!!!!

There will be no vote, there is no TA and there will be no turkey for thanksgiving or xmas....Scrooge has spoken

Welcome to Netjets no matter which one you work for...
 
At this point, the rumors that you have seen have merit. All but one specific item has been completed. Unfortunately, that particular item pertains to Union protections under the grievance process for our crewmembers who bid to the NJI side. In essence, we refuse to allow our Union members to be subjected to some type of NJI Kangaroo court possibility. These types of items, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO ENSURE THE COMPANY UNDERSTANDS THAT THESE PROTECTIONS WERE NOT NEGOTIABLE, are obviously show-stoppers to any agreement
 
Lmao

Fired at will? NJI kangaroo courts? You're kidding, right?

You fellas get way too much info from flightinfo.com; it's got a way of making you cynical.

In light of this bit of bad news, I suspect every one of the 200+ NJA applicants for Gulfstream positions will be withdrawing their applications by week's end. I mean, who wants to be fired at will after being subjected to a kangaroo court?

Couple of tips: Don't hold your breath on the above scenario (unless it stinks), and get your heads out of this forum for a while. It's all the usual suspects spreading discontent....
 
ghostrider64 said:
Details are that Management wont agree to terms reference NJI that were agreed to last week. Expects anyone flying for NJI to waive his right to Union protection. IE FIRED AT WILL OF NJI....

What does this mean?


DEAL BREAKER!!!!

There will be no vote, there is no TA and there will be no turkey for thanksgiving or xmas....Scrooge has spoken

Welcome to Netjets no matter which one you work for...

As of 0828, October 18, there are no notices about any of this on our union website. Where are you getting this stuff? What John, told Sally, told Fred is meaningless.
 
bart-

Check under the tree, posting from the mec member he explains it all right there.
 
Diesel said:
bart-

Check under the tree, posting from the mec member he explains it all right there.

I read that. All he says is that they are still finalizing the language (with this one item to go) and then he explains why this language is so important (which it is). They've been working on finalizing the language for a week or so now (we were even told last week that they still had some cleanup left to do) so there doesn't seem to be any new information here. I'm sure that most of the language that had been finalized over the past week would have been a "deal breaker" had it not been finalized. Nowhere have I seen ANY communication from the union leadership that says the company has backed out of the deal. This appears (at least right now) to be something that is being taken by a couple individuals and being blown way out of proportion.
 
Definitely some overeacting going on, not necessarily a bad thing if it shows one last time just how serious we are about this....


Just another "idiot" bypass FO.
 
Last edited:
ahhh i don't think it's overacting anymore.

I knew where there is smoke there is fire.
 
All bets are off!

Netjets management has reniged on their written contract to finalize the TA.

Call it what you want but it is what it is- bad faith negotiations, unetical corporate behaviour- breaking a written contract shows exactly what type of croonies are running this place.

Merry F'in christmas dick, your ego has just sunk the U.S.S. Netjets!

Maybe, just maybe, you can plug the holes with additional wads of cash to your most dedicated pilot employees to keep your ego afloat.

But read this- we are done playing F'in games with you now!
 
If the TA fails to pass, what will be the next step?
 
Bad Monkey! said:
All bets are off!

Netjets management has reniged on their written contract to finalize the TA.

Call it what you want but it is what it is- bad faith negotiations, unetical corporate behaviour- breaking a written contract shows exactly what type of croonies are running this place.

Merry F'in christmas dick, your ego has just sunk the U.S.S. Netjets!

Maybe, just maybe, you can plug the holes with additional wads of cash to your most dedicated pilot employees to keep your ego afloat.

But read this- we are done playing F'in games with you now!



So what is the Story? Did management back out for sure or are they still working on the last min details? Like to know - Sound kinda pisssed So I gues s you must have got somthing in the mail!
 
It looks like events are changing rapidly and everyone is blaming the lawyers. There may be progress yet. As everyone can well imagine there is a lot of emotion invested here. And please stop calling the NJI episode a seat grab - it is about making someone live up to their word. Most NJA folks - especially we older ones - are not impressed by or could give a good flip about a G. First time I saw one in the 70s I was impressed by how small it was. And that is the latest ....
 
Yes it is over reacting, they have not "pulled" anything. They are taking longer than they were supposed to for the lawyers to work through protections for pilots going to NJI. One detail to be worked out and no need to have a stroke over it, yet...


Just another "idiot" bypass FO.
 
JustInfo said:
Yes it is over reacting, they have not "pulled" anything. They are taking longer than they were supposed to for the lawyers to work through protections for pilots going to NJI. One detail to be worked out and no need to have a stroke over it, yet...


Just another "idiot" bypass FO.

I freaking out and I don't even work there! I have an interview tomarrow and waiting to see if everything works out!
 
Well, well, well. Little Ricky came through for the G boys. Like h25b said, it happened a lot sooner than we expected.

NJA is once again bargaining in bad faith.

How do you feel about you company now moles? Just who is jeapordizing the company? When will Ricky put his bloated ego aside?
 
Well, since it isn't a seat-grab and none of the NJA'ers here think the G's are anything special, then why would this be a deal-breaker?

It's really not a big deal at all... ;) TC
 
Everyone untie their panties now...

Deal is back together, NJI stuff was finalized today. I don't know all the details of the LOA but it is now complete.

LOL, Av8orboy that was funny....I think you are right about that, what should we name the show?

The NJI LOA is a deal breaker because it is to protect our future as well as level the playing field. Why should we be told what we can't have while NJI is getting it.
 
AA717driver said:
Well, since it isn't a seat-grab and none of the NJA'ers here think the G's are anything special, then why would this be a deal-breaker?

It's really not a big deal at all... ;) TC

It's not a big deal to me. Like someone said, I get tired just looking at a G. It is a big deal to some though. Santulli promised it. They want it. It is a matter of him keeping his word.

On another note. We just want to be treated like NJI. If FFH is good enough for them, why not for us? Why have we waited for four years for that benifit. Little Ricky promised us that five years ago and reneged. Seems Little Ricky is NOT a man of his word. In fact his word isn't worth a puddle of spit.

Scope, scope and scope. It is job protection after all. That is a big deal.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom