Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
been-there said:It's the FAA that mandates duty limits.
I want to give you a different perspective on your comment (that I bolded). Let's see how you feel about your wonderful Santulli if I change a few words in your sentence...CMHTroll said:Nobody likes it when something like this happens. It appears that you are fueling the fire of the "attitude." It is unfortunate and somebody, somewhere made an error that caused the issue. If it was scheduling then it needs to be corrected. If it was pilots excerising their god given right to proceede as slowly as possible in preflight and reviewing the brief until they would go over on duty time, then that needs to be corrected. It used to be that everyone worked to give the Owners the NetJets experience, but more and more the Owners recieve the Strong Union ecperience and they don't like the "attitude."
Hogprint said:Rest assured, we are laying in the bed that Netjets has made. I don't like it and you don't seem to like it.
Let me ask you this...do you ever feel this company has lied to you? Nothing is 100% true all the time, but this incident is BS. Do you feel your not getting your moneys worth of your "Netjets experience"? Do you feel you being squeezed out by card holders?
Have you even thought about this or do you just blame the crew for something they had no control over? I think the crew shafted us, I am certain of this. Also, the way it was done, without any kind of appolgy on their part, proves that.[/QUOTE]
Majik said:I want to give you a different perspective on your comment (that I bolded). Let's see how you feel about your wonderful Santulli if I change a few words in your sentence...
If it was Santulli exercising his god given right to proceed as slowly as possible in negotiating this contract, then that needs to be corrected.
See what I mean? Why is it wrong for the pilots to exercise their god given right (if they were) and yet you see nothing wrong with Santulli creating all of this ill will among his employees by exercising his god given right by delaying this contract to save all of this extra money?
Why is your criticism aimed at the pilots and not at the man responsible for all of this animosity?
FLYLOW22 said:Sounds to me like SCHEDULING should have allocated a different crew to your trip. There are several other operators who look at regulations with a bleary eye.
The trip was plain and clear, it required a crew that could fly nonstop on a CX from SFO to New York. What is so hard to understand about this? I'm just not buying the fact that scheduling did this to us.
The crew ran out of duty time.
Why if they indeed were short of duty time (which I don't believe they were) were they placed on this mission?
Majik said:First, let me tell you that I feel your pain. Countless times the company hangs their pilots out there with no rhyme or reason as to why they screwed up an owner's request. I do believe that the crew had no knowledge of your trip requirements until you made it known to them. Otherwise, why would the company assign them your trip when they know and track every crew's duty day? Sounds like your problem lies with your Owner Services Team and Scheduling, not the pilots. We only do what the Head Shed tells us to and we won't break any FARs for you. If we did, trust me, the company would self-disclose us to the FAA in a heartbeat and we would be the ones left holding the bag. Maybe Flex Jet, Flight Options, Citation Shares, or some other pilots will break the rules for you but I wouldn't depend on it.
Again, sorry that Owner Services or Scheduling gave you the shaft. Hope you voice your concerns with the folks that caused you this inconvenience and not the pilots.
Santulli and Boisture are moving as fast as possible? Where do you get that crap? They are profit maximizers and will do ANYTHING to achieve that goal! They've even convinced you to proclaim that they are doing everything humanly possible to help their wonderful pilots and it's only the 5 MEC members that are ruining the company.CMHTroll said:My criticism to pilots is that Santulli and Boisture have been moving as fast as possible and have been since spring of 04. I cannot speak to issues of the old MEC or the previous management. The proceeding in a slow pace to Owners to hurt the business seems innapropiate at this time when the hold up in negociations is the Union MEC at this point and time. (If they had reviewed the books months ago as they are starting to do now we would not have wasted months.) Therefore Santulli has corrected his course and it is the MEC that is proceeding slowly and encouraging it's members to proceede slowly. A respectful but different opinion.
Majik said:Santulli and Boisture are moving as fast as possible? Where do you get that crap? They are profit maximizers and will do ANYTHING to achieve that goal! They've even convinced you to proclaim that they are doing everything humanly possible to help their wonderful pilots and it's only the 5 MEC members that are ruining the company.
I don't care what the books say. Santulli is smart enough to move money from his right pocket (NJA) to his left (NJI) back rear (NJE) or back left pocket (EJM) so that no accountant could find it and, if he did, would determine that it was legal. The books, like statistics, mean only what the manipulator wants them to mean. Santulli is either going to pay market wages for his pilots or this place is going to slowly grind to a halt. This MEC is doing exactly what the membership polls requested they do. So when you mistakenly blame the MEC for contract delays, just say "the pilots" since that whose direction the MEC is acting on. Look, Santulli is the one that will make the final decision to either stop the bleeding or let NJA die. I'll accept either decision but I won't settle for something substandard and I won't break my back to go above and beyond until the profit maximizer makes up his mind.