On Your Six
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Posts
- 4,507
PseudoName said:FYI....in the Part 135 world, C-X PIC's are making 75-80K. I know a 5th year NJA C-X Captain, he made over 65K last year, only worked 14 days a month, and had June - August off as vacation (well, I think he worked 2 tours in the 3 months).
Compare this schedule and pay with a Part 135 pilot, on-call 365/7 days a week with 2-3 weeks vacation per year, making 80K. NetJets QOL/pay doesn't look too bad!
Yes, there are a few Part 91 midsize aircraft operators that pay their pilots lots of $$$ and only fly 400 hrs a year, however, using them as a benchmark for your payscale and QOL is absurd.
As I have mentioned on this board many times, the grass isn't always greener on the other side. You want to be paid similar to all the other corporate pilots, then I would suggest that your pilot group give up over half of your "hard days off"....maybe then Warren will give you the pay you are DEMANDING!
Hmmmmmm, you sound like NJA management to me.... Most people who know NJA pilots would agree that they are worked hard on the road and that they are not paid well compared to their Part 91 peers. Why would a pilot debate this and suggest the NJA pilots are not worthy of an increase after YEARS AND YEARS OF NEGOTIATIONS? Sounds fishy to me....
I personally know a Part 91 Citation X Captain based in the Northeast who flies maybe 300 hours per year and he makes about $95K with very few ancillary duties. He also has great schedules with few RONs - just a lot of day trips up and down the coast. Sure, that's not normal by any means, but he is paid a lot more to fly the same aircraft for far fewer hours... Your assertion that a comparison is "absurd" is not justifiable if you compare the same aircraft type with roughly the same number of flight hours - even with beeper hours included.
Last edited: