Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NetJets Pilots to Picket Meeting of Berkshire Hathaway Shareholders

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
PseudoName said:
FYI....in the Part 135 world, C-X PIC's are making 75-80K. I know a 5th year NJA C-X Captain, he made over 65K last year, only worked 14 days a month, and had June - August off as vacation (well, I think he worked 2 tours in the 3 months).

Compare this schedule and pay with a Part 135 pilot, on-call 365/7 days a week with 2-3 weeks vacation per year, making 80K. NetJets QOL/pay doesn't look too bad!

Yes, there are a few Part 91 midsize aircraft operators that pay their pilots lots of $$$ and only fly 400 hrs a year, however, using them as a benchmark for your payscale and QOL is absurd.

As I have mentioned on this board many times, the grass isn't always greener on the other side. You want to be paid similar to all the other corporate pilots, then I would suggest that your pilot group give up over half of your "hard days off"....maybe then Warren will give you the pay you are DEMANDING!

Hmmmmmm, you sound like NJA management to me.... Most people who know NJA pilots would agree that they are worked hard on the road and that they are not paid well compared to their Part 91 peers. Why would a pilot debate this and suggest the NJA pilots are not worthy of an increase after YEARS AND YEARS OF NEGOTIATIONS? Sounds fishy to me....

I personally know a Part 91 Citation X Captain based in the Northeast who flies maybe 300 hours per year and he makes about $95K with very few ancillary duties. He also has great schedules with few RONs - just a lot of day trips up and down the coast. Sure, that's not normal by any means, but he is paid a lot more to fly the same aircraft for far fewer hours... Your assertion that a comparison is "absurd" is not justifiable if you compare the same aircraft type with roughly the same number of flight hours - even with beeper hours included.
 
Last edited:
GVFlyer said:
Not to be argumentative, but Flight Options new fleet consists of the Hawker 400, the Hawker 800, the Citation X, and the WSCoD.

And what's up with the "El Chupacabra"? That means "goat sucker" in Spanish.

GV

Ahhh....but something gets lost in the translation. A legendary and some say mythical beast, not unlike Sasquatch or the Yeti. Supposedly it killed and slaughtered livestock for many years, and was feared by generations of native people.

Doesn't scare me, though.

But, my ex-wife's divorce lawyer ? That's a different story. :)
 
On Your Six said:
Hmmmmmm, you sound like NJA management to me....

Bingo Six. Everytime sometime goes not according to the NJA plan, all the root weevils pop-up on this board and try to explain how the pilots at NetJets are:

1) Outrageous in their demands
2) Totally ineffective in their plans
3) Doomed to failure

I only wish that the mediators of this message board would flip the switch in the admin control panel that would allow everyone to see the IP addresses of these clowns. It'd be pretty funny to see all the ones owned by Netjets. Mark - If you're reading this thread, please do that for us. I'd love to point out all the "undercover" folks on here.

The operation out in OMA was first-rate. We only had about 250-300 pilots company-wide that had this weekend off because of our schedules. Over 70 of them showed up in OMA! Considering that everyone there had to get out there on their own and the fact that most of us can't just run over to the airport and jumpseat - it's a pretty amazing feat. It did what it was supposed to do. Now we wait to see what direction the next couple of negotiation sessions take and go from there.
 
Griz, it was a pleasure to meet you face to face! You can now laugh, as I do, at the posts suggesting that I sit around and eat "bon bons" or "twinkies" all day while ignoring my children. I'm sorry that I didn't get to spend more time with the pilots, but taking the kids to the zoo (my 2 + 2 more) did allow another wife to drive a van on Saturday. Our personal arrangement was an analogy of the behind the scenes work that it takes to put a pilot out on the line. Those who insist on counting only those they saw walking, are making a grave mistake in using that to judge the level of determination that exists among the NJ pilots/families.

I have always maintained that the NJ fight for fairness is a family affair. I'm glad that those in charge of the event feel the same way. I enjoyed meeting you in person. My thanks, also, to the 2 NJ pilots that drove the van which I rode on to OMA. It was a pleasure guys.

To all of you who walked the line, it was a fine beginning. You made us proud! I urge those who read this board to remember that it WAS a start and DID accomplish its goal of raising awareness and showing the resolve of the pilotforce.
 
A few observations I would like to bring to everyone's attention. First to beat this safety nail for the last time for those of you that obviously do not understand. Fractionals exist because of their safety records. PERIOD. The SAFE pilots that haven't already left WILL leave the fractional industry if we don't make this life worth living. A 1500 hour newbee to Aspen is more likely to carve a groove in the mountain than the guy that knows how to calculate second segment climb and knows what NA means.
 
Grim Reaper said:
......The safety argument is tired. Certainly you guys are not going to be less safe without a pay raise. I mean, who is always the first person to the accident site: the PILOT. So, the pay me more and I will be safer argument really does not hold water. ........

Grim Reaper, it seems to me that you are misunderstanding the safety argument. It actually goes like this---you get what you pay for, a simple concept well recognized by those with the funds to afford the best. Experienced pilots will not remain at a company that refuses to pay them the going rate for their labor and expertise. The owners DO care about safety and DO expect to be flown by very experienced pilots. They will not be interested in having the level of experience that such low wages will buy. Successful business people know that there are really only two options--pay salaries that retain the best workers or lower standards. When it comes to their own safety and that of their family's, what do you think the owners will tell the company to do??
 
Second... Mission accomplished. What some see as a lack of media coverage, I interpret as victory. The shareholders of BH OWN the media. They have instructed their networks to not air this story because they are embarassed; and once aired they would be even more humiliated. The lack of media coverage indicates that you have their undivided attention. Now tell them what you need to be happy! ASAP has the con!!!!!!!
 
netjetwife said:
Experienced pilots will not remain at a company that refuses to pay them the going rate for their labor and expertise.

Supply and demand. Problem is, management knows that pilots have few options. There's an endless supply of qualified pilots to take care of attrition.
 
Give the pilots a HARUMPH!

netjetwife said:
Those who insist on counting only those they saw walking, are making a grave mistake in using that to judge the level of determination that exists among the NJ pilots/families.

By mentioning that I only saw a "limited" amount of pilots walking no way implies that I don't think you all are not dedicated. Nor am I assuming that there isn't an army of support personnel making it possible for those pilots to have been walking in the first place.

I wish I would have had an opportunity to stop and talk, unfortunately I had my behind planted in the seat of a fuel truck for a majority of the day. But, I hope you all enjoyed your stay in Omaha - a city founded in 1854 on the principles of sticking it to the little guy. The zoo is first rate and we have two tall buildings. Did anyone have a chance to go visit the Strategic Air and Space Museum? We have other stuff, but I must spend my mental energies on writing a paper rather than trying to think of the various nuances of this fair city.
 
If punctuation is such a concern for you, perhaps you should have become an English Teacher instead. You'd probably be making more money than you are now as a pilot.

It wasn't punctuation, it was..........neutral partisan. eeeeeek
 

Latest resources

Back
Top