Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Need some Virgin America Info...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
To think that a company like VX would or even could, hamper a legacy pilot groups ability to negotiate a contract that their company can afford (in the eyes of a Mediator), is a myopic view at best and a cop-out at worst.

Really? Ask a UAL narrowbody guy how he likes working for the old B6 wage rate imposed by the bankruptcy court judge.

The view that pilots who fly A320s for regional wages doesn't effect other contract negotiations isn't myopic, its just plain blind.
 
Really? Ask a UAL narrowbody guy how he likes working for the old B6 wage rate imposed by the bankruptcy court judge.

The view that pilots who fly A320s for regional wages doesn't effect other contract negotiations isn't myopic, its just plain blind.

The key word in your supposition is "bankruptcy". Do you seriously think they would have done any better had B6 not existed? The UAL negotiators/MEC were faced with determining the lesser of two "evils"; the first "evil" would be what could be negotiated given the financial position of the company, The second (worse) "evil" would be rolling the dice and taking what the Court imposed. I believe the negcom and MEC chose the first "evil", that is negotiating a "restructuring agreement" outside of court. (http://www.docstoc.com/docs/50899490/ALPA---UAL-Restructuring-Agreement-March-26-2003).

It is obvious from your rhetoric and words, that you have not been directly involved in these types of negotiations and what truly drives them. Hopefully someone who was involved directly in the UAL restructuring can chime in to educate us all. In my perspective, it seems to be a very shallow assumption on your part that B6 was responsible for the gutting of the UAL contract. You would be better to place the blame where it belongs; on the shoulders of UAL's inept, greedy and arrogant management.

Out of curiosity, why do you not spend your energy and efforts to help organize these properties that you rail against (B6 and VX)? The vitriol that you espouse doesn't do you justice if you are truly a Union man. It simply paints you as a bitter isolationist.

S
 
That agreement is negotiated between the Airline and the union. The bankruptcy judge lends his approval to it. Trustees do the majority of negotiating between debtors and creditors and doling out monies to creditors. Bankruptcy judges sign off on motions and petitions during the process.
 
Last edited:
UAL's "inept, greedy and arrogant management" shoulder much of the blame but in UAL's case their was much to share. The role of a B6 or in the future a VX is simple. They are used as a reference during the negotiations. Most domestic airlines flying similar equipment are used as examples.
 
UAL's "inept, greedy and arrogant management" shoulder much of the blame but in UAL's case their was much to share. The role of a B6 or in the future a VX is simple. They are used as a reference during the negotiations. Most domestic airlines flying similar equipment are used as examples.

True.

"A" reference point. Not "the" reference point.

S
 
UAL's "inept, greedy and arrogant management" shoulder much of the blame but in UAL's case their was much to share. The role of a B6 or in the future a VX is simple. They are used as a reference during the negotiations. Most domestic airlines flying similar equipment are used as examples.

Exactly. For a narrowbody operator negotiating this year, LCC and UAL rates will be a factor. And they are so low PRECISELY because of the horrid non-Union B6 rate that was imposed way back when.

Factor in the terrible VX rate currently on the books and it becomes an uphill battle. Sorry, Skip, but those are the facts.
 
Exactly. For a narrowbody operator negotiating this year, LCC and UAL rates will be a factor. And they are so low PRECISELY because of the horrid non-Union B6 rate that was imposed way back when.

Factor in the terrible VX rate currently on the books and it becomes an uphill battle. Sorry, Skip, but those are the facts.

Now Fubi let's not get all crazylike. As Jetblue benchmarks pay rates today the VX rates move the average down 2-3%. The B6 rates used during the UAL bankruptcy could have moved the percentage about the same. One airline does not make or break the average.
 
That's true. However, when one (or several) airlines set the downward trend in wages/benefits, other airlines are pressured to follow. The reverse of "jacking the house" if you will.

Look at SWA. They have the highest narrowbody pay rate right now. However, the God King just warned them that there may have to be "adjustments" due to their recent losses.

And the rationale will be to remain "competitive" with carriers who pay their narrowbody Captains regional turboprop rates.
 
Fubi, what ALPA carrier is hiring right now? Delta, no. UniCal, no. Airtran, no. You tell me one legacy/major ALPA carrier that is hiring, and I'll apply. Until then, if VA calls, I'm taking it. Or, would you rather that I "hold the line" on this profession and continue flying for an ALPA regional airline making s***** wages?
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top