Need help finding reg

[phishn@daves]

Bubba said nothing about a sid or star or declining an approach.

I think he asked if a textural description of an approach procedure is acceptable to use instead of the commonly used approach charts.

Actually, he asked for a regulation to that effect.

Regulations, gentlemen, not opinions or sidebars.

Okay gentlemen, He's a flight Instructor. He must know what everyone is thinking.

Easy guy, we were giving him what we knew. I don't believe there were any "sidebars" given, just thoughts that related to the same question.

But reading some of your other post's makes me think you don't know what the he!! you are talking about anyway.................and the Corporate/Airline guy's don't belong on "your" forum.

 

[midlifeflyer]

I The regs state... Also, they state you "should" have all required ... navigational materials ... necessary to complete a particular flight..etc.

Where? I know where it says that for Part 121, 125,135 and Subparts F and K of Part 91, but where do the regs say that for a run of the mill Part 91 flight?

And violating a "should" is not illegal anyway.

 

[AC560]

Where? I know where it says that for Part 121, 125,135 and Subparts F and K of Part 91, but where do the regs say that for a run of the mill Part 91 flight?

There is nothing for a run of the mill part 91 flight involving charts other then 91.13.

 

[midlifeflyer]

Exactly.I was wondering what reg phishin was referring to in his post.

 

[phishn@daves]

Exactly.I was wondering what reg phishin was referring to in his post.

If you re-read the ACTUAL question, he is looking for INFORMATION on if it is or is not allowable to shoot an approach having only the textual description.

I think the info I gave him was what he was looking for, though I told him I don't know where it specifically states as such in the Regs.

 

[midlifeflyer]

If you re-read the ACTUAL question, he is looking for INFORMATION on if it is or is not allowable to shoot an approach having only the textual description.

I think the info I gave him was what he was looking for, though I told him I don't know where it specifically states as such in the Regs.

I'll take a WAG that, given the title of the thread, if he wasn't looking for a reg, when he asked for information he was looking for an AIM reference, AC, NTSB case, FAA Legal Opinion or somehting else a bit more solid solid that "some guy on the Internet said..."

So do you have a reference for your opinion or did you just make it up?

 

[PURPLEHAZE21]

Hey...How about new aircraft with EFB's and MFD's which have the approach plates electronically. If anyone of the systems are MEL'd, you must have a textual, printed copy of the approach plates for the Destiation, Alternates,...etc...per the FAA and op specs..I know, this still does'nt answer the original question....but it is required data.

 

[phishn@daves]

I'll take a WAG that, given the title of the thread, if he wasn't looking for a reg, when he asked for information he was looking for an AIM reference, AC, NTSB case, FAA Legal Opinion or somehting else a bit more solid solid that "some guy on the Internet said..."

So do you have a reference for your opinion or did you just make it up?

Well, the info I had was from what I had remembered as a FI, now that I looked it up, it seems the only textual form you can have is for a SID only. FAA.org

However, the original poster has not replied since, strange?