MalteseX
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2005
- Posts
- 188
Whistlin' Dan said:No, it does not!
As a pilot, your duties and responsibilities remain essentially the same, whether you're flying a full 727 from SDQ to Ft Wayne or wherever, or a 767 with one box from Anchorage to Taipei. As a previous post illustrates, when a company loses money (which yours did, in opening many foreign markets) it doesn't mean that labor is expected to work for "free." The skills necessary to perform your job and the difficulties you incur while performing it lie irrespective of whether the company is making money or not. Like the neighborhood gardner I used in my analogy, the value of your service is determined (at least on the high end) by how motivated your company is to avoid an interruption of service. On the low end, it's determined by the lowest amount that other pilots are willing to work for. If you look at what other pilots flying similar equipment and schedules are making, you'll see that you have an industry-leading contract.
If you want to share in the profits of your company, I suggest you use your raise to purchase as much stock in them as your budget or the articles of their incorporation will allow.
Lee Iaccocca used to close his automobile commercials with a challenge to prospective purchasers..."If you can find a better car, BUY it!"
I think a similar challenge might be put forth to anybody who feels that the UPS pilot group are "idiots" for ratifying this contract.
Now that's a good explanation. I see your point now, what you were getting at. I really didn't follow the gardener analogy (still don't)... but I see where you are coming from with this post.
It's funny. We actually agree. I just got hung up on the gardener analogy, and totally missed your point. (also, I missed that you were responding to a previous post; makes more sense to me now--then again, I think that was on my day off after a few free Corona's).
Last edited: