Crossky said:Isn't it a factor 1.159 (knots to mph)? If so it was still an 11 knot TW to a 6.5K ft contaminated runway with snow and BA fair and poor, at night. Two ATA's refused 31C, wanted 13 and diverted. Does this make the SWA crew brave or gamblers? Dice rollers at the very least.
My standard comfort level BA poor max TW is 5 kt unless you have gobs of RWY length.
Honestly I do like SWA (except for the pay to play part), but three of their 737's have overrun runways in the last six years. The FAA should address this trend I believe. Their PR crew at Love will really have their hands busy with Wright plus this after it gets out.
Go ahead, I've got my fire suit on now.
OK, I'll bite.
Lets see, all this comes from your vast experience in flying transport aircraft all over the US into all different types of airports in all types of weather! Your comfort level and our comfort level may be different due to our experience in equipment, airports, training (HUDS), 5-6 Takeoffs and Landing every day at work etc. I will still put our safety record up against anyone at 3000+ flights a day in the US. This last Midway incident was indeed tragic but I can think of a lot of worse scenarios that could have been.
We use a computer to do performance for every landing we do, rain or shine! If what you say is true then our computer would have red flagged the landing data since 10 kts is our limit and the crew couldn't have done the approach. I am sure it was OK to land that evening since a company aircraft landed right in front of him. Time will tell and the NTSB will make there ruling when all the data has been analyzed.
3 overruns? Do you know something that I don't know?