spacecadet1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2005
- Posts
- 260
We have a chart which gives estimated landing distances for the MD-80 on a contaminated runway. It shows distance with and without reverse. The difference is about 1,000 ft. But for a typical landing weight, the distance with the use of reversers was about 6,500 to 6,800 ft. The available landing distance at MDW beyond threshold was around 5,800. These estimated distances do not include the FAR fudge factor; they are the bare minimum. I wouldn't land an 80 there under these conditions (I don't have the actual 737 numbers so can't really comment about it).
To be fair to the crew I would say that the subjective statements about poor or fair braking action are just that: subjective. Maybe it is time to have Mu readings reported, and to make landing field friction requirements just like we have visibility requirements.
To be fair to the crew I would say that the subjective statements about poor or fair braking action are just that: subjective. Maybe it is time to have Mu readings reported, and to make landing field friction requirements just like we have visibility requirements.