Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

more ACA furloughs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Humty72
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 15

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Is it possible?

That ACA management has simply been holding onto what they feel are surplus pilots as long as possible on the hope of reaching some sort of deal with UA to retain what they currently have? I don't work there, but as far as I can tell they aren't really close to a deal for Boeings or Airbii's let alone starting training for them. Additionally w/o a UA deal the J41's go away pretty much immediately, right? The DAL FRJ issue has been well bantied about as well. All of this would seem to point to furloughs imo, could it be they haven't happened because ACA management hopes to still reach a deal and need to be prepared for it?
 
I think Marko is right about the surplus pilots. Considering the fiasco we had starting ACJet and not having crews for the airplanes, my hunch is this time we had the situation reversed. We hired a bunch of new F.O.'s and promoted a bunch of F.O.'s to Captain - when we didn't get all of the new CRJ's, we were overstaffed. ACA held on as long as it could by offering voluntary furloughs to captains but finally it reached a stage that we had to furlough those new hire F.O.'s and displace those new captains.
 
Re: Why??

[QUOTEI guess the point that I am getting at is that Delta management could simply say "Hey, nothing we can do about it so sorry!"
Any thoughts? :cool: [/B][/QUOTE]

Well there actually is something DAL would have to do if ACA were to ever operate jets with greater than 70 seats. DAL would be required to let go of the ACA contract. There is a clause in the DAL-ACA contract for early termination of that contract. While I'm not sure whether or not DAL would then have to assume the DoJet leases or not, even if DAL had to, I'm sure DAL could find someone to fly them on the exact same routes they are on today.
 
Last edited:
Re: Is it possible?

Marko Ramius said:
I don't work there, but as far as I can tell they aren't really close to a deal for Boeings or Airbii's let alone starting training for them...imo, could it be they haven't happened because ACA management hopes to still reach a deal and need to be prepared for it?

Marko,

You were correct initially, you are not qualified to make that grandios of an assumption, as far as I can tell. Since you don't work for ACA as I do, since you don't have access to our ALPA boards, or possibly have uninformed cohorts employed at ACA (or you believe what you read on this rumor board), you really wouldn't know what's going on between us and UAL.

There maybe a deal with UAL concerning our turboprop flying, but the rest is history. The furloughs are due to a myriad of schedule changes in ORD as flying is swapped between us, SKW and AWAC. There is no correlation between a possible reconcilliation between ACA and UAL and additional furloughs. That is the best answer I am qualified to give since I am not a scheduling guru, I just bid the packet and hope for the best.

Widely accepted speculation is that UAL is trying to strangle us as vindictively as possible as we gracefully exit the UAX program and make it hurt as they figure out how to unscrew themselves primarily in IAD and also ORD. There may be additional furoughs as projected staffing materialize during the gestation of Goldilocks (did that slut sleep with all three bears before or after she ate their porridge?). These furloughs may possibly be due to the transitionary period as we saw off the old ball and chain (hopefully we'll miss the femoural artery).

Also, as ALPA and MGT continue to battle it out over pay and bennies, ACA is in mid-stage talks with both Boeing and Airbus. ACA is planning to make the purchase announcement first week of November, if the itinerary holds.

My crystal ball goes fuzzy beyond that and my majic eight ball is on the charger. I really need to study for my maneuvers validation...max thrust, flaps 8, pos rate gear up, speed mode, heading, half bank, bug V2...

Tailwinds...
 
The harsh reality that fee for departure is about as profitable as dot com..... It is too bad that a whole industry was built around bad science.... There will be some serious casualties before it is over and it sounds like ACA is first in line to go down the "proverbial tube". What a great time to have your company fail, just when there are no jobs in your line of work.... See ya later blue ridgers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
dogg said:
The harsh reality that fee for departure is about as profitable as dot com..... It is too bad that a whole industry was built around bad science.... There will be some serious casualties before it is over and it sounds like ACA is first in line to go down the "proverbial tube". What a great time to have your company fail, just when there are no jobs in your line of work.... See ya later blue ridgers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'll take this one....

ACA's misfortunes are the result of bad luck (Dornier out of business) and UAL's demise. Bad science has nothing to do with it. Fee for departure contracts work for both parties. Problem is UAL want's a fee that' s too low. I guess it's ACA's fault that United doesn't want to pay the ACTUAL COSTS OF FLYING OUT OF ORD AND IAD. At least our management has the foresight to walk away from a bad contract. Here at ACA, we don't act like b#tches willing to work for nothing.


As far as the comment of ACA going down the "proverbial tube"....I'm sure there are many others like you who would love for ACA to fail at WHATEVER path we take. It's nice to see pilots looking out for other pilots...keep up the good work and thanks for the sympathy.

House
 
HouseX - Well said!

BTW - Are there any other curious ACAers like myself wishing our ALPA would come out with some sort of statement re the rumors of D328J possible shift to CMR? The buzz is getting louder by the day - and its not our people who originate it, but the CMR types, who have heard that their co is requesting they negotiate D328J pay rates. I would suspect its only logical that ACA amd CMR would give some the opportunity to shift - ACA would benefit since they'd save an enormous retraining cost (300+ pilots) and CMR could benefit by a ready-training group of pilots.

JT
 
would you say that most, or all, of the do-jet pilots would want to come over to comair if that did happen? or are a lot of guys holding out for "goldilocks" (is that what your company calls it?)?
 
Anaconda,
That's the same question I was asking myself. I think that a lot depends on if the ACA pilots come over at the bottom of the Comair list or if there is some type of integration.

As for me, I'm going to stay with ACA. Nothing against Comair, but I'll roll the dice for the chance to grow into a LCC. Also, the commute has a lot to do with it - trying to commute out of PNS is a nightmare on Delta - and I think it would be 2 legs up to CVG. If ACA serves the Gulf Coast, my commute (on our own aircraft) would make life much more pleasant.
 
Anaconda -

I waffle constantly on the issue. With my DOH (mid-summer 2000) I suspect I would have the seniority to hold a jr. CA spot at CMR (could you confirm this). As it sounds right now, I'm a "senior" FO, with no prospects of upgrading for I suspect at least another 2yrs, and I need another hour of FO time like I need a bullet in my head. Nothing against being an FO - I enjoy my position and the seniority I have in my seat, but it comes to the point where professionally, I don't think I'm developing as I should be.

I believe the fundamentals of CMR as a company are much more sound than at ACA - that being said, we are seeing a lot of operational improvements so this issue is still up in the air.

Risking it with the ACA LCC would be an interesting. I think it definitely has potential - it started with quite a bang and everyone was quite enthusted, but it seems to have lost some steam. For example, I was told in recurrent that the a/c type would be selected by early Sept - its now nearly Oct and according to the Chief Pilot hotline yesterday they aren't anticipating any narrowbody transition until at least 2Q of 2004. A lot of things have to fall in place for it to succeed - ACA mgmt recognizes that and they are changing things.

If I had to make the choice right now - I would probably be 55% going to CMR, 45% staying with ACA, however there are a few other issues to consider like how seniority/DOH integration would work. I'd also have to check with some buds at CMR to get a thorough inside look at the place.

I'd be interested to hear more perspective from other ACA 328ers. I know there's a lot of people commuting out of the IAD area to both CVG and BOS who are just itching to get back to the LCC, but there's also others like myself who have settled in at other bases like BOS or CVG and enjoy the lifestyle and flying out here. In particular, a lot of our guys are settling in CVG and like the cheap cost of living - I think if given reasonable seniority they'd make the jump - of course this is entirely speculative.

Other perspectives?

JT
 
JTrain said:
With my DOH (mid-summer 2000) I suspect I would have the seniority to hold a jr. CA spot at CMR (could you confirm this).

that's correct. you wouldn't be at the bottom, but you would be close to it...
 
46 & JTrain-

Unfortunately, we may never get the chance to bid the CRJ. As more people get furloughed and CA's keep getting displaced (as CRJ f/o's), we will be pushed further down the list. The F/O's in the 41's will most likely get displaced into the CRJ before 328 F/O's (out of seniority as part of current negotiations). The only way we'll get the CRJ is bump and flush...the company will avoid that at all costs. The question is how many pilots does ACA need? I say 1200. If that's that's the case, I'm getting my gold bars today.
 
JTrain said:
With my DOH (mid-summer 2000) I suspect I would have the seniority to hold a jr. CA spot at CMR (could you confirm this).

Other perspectives?
JT

JT,

This is all speculation as well, so don't bet the farm on any of it, but here are some numbers that may give you an idea. They are not "perfect" but they are reasonably close and based on our most recent published "list" (07/01/03)

You said your DOH was "mid summer" of 2000. I assumed that was June 1.

I count about 12 Captains on the CMR list with hire dates between 06/2000 and 12/2000.

Between 01/2000 and 05/2000 I count about 70 FO's (all senior to you - if you were hired in June). Going back to 1999, I count another 65 +- FO's, also senior to you. I didn't go further than that.

So roughly, there are now about 150 CMR FO's senior to you (I'm sure more if I went back further) and whether or not you could hold a left seat is somewhat doubtful.

If these airplanes did come to CMR and you guys come with them, I assume that no one would be displaced from his current position. I assume also that the seniority integration would be DOH. After that, future vacancies would be bid on seniority.

The Company would most likely want to avoid as much training as possible and would probably ask for some sort of fence to avoid the training bubble. That would present some problems due to the bypass provisions of the Comair PWA, but within reason, it is doable.

For these reasons, I don't see your rapid promotion to Captain as a result of this transition. Not with the seniority you currently have. It would take roughly 30 new airplanes to upgrade the FO's that are currently at CMR and senior to you. When or if those aiplanes will come is anybody's guess.

If Comairs' pilots don't give in to the concession request, they may never come and we might even lose some that we have now. If we do give in to concessions (which I hope we will not do) there is still no guarantee whatever that we will get even one new airplane. As long as Delta doesn't sign our PWA, we have no guaranteed flying of any kind, no matter what Comair might "promise".

This is just my opinion, but maybe it will give you some insight. Presonally I would be happy to welcome all of you with DOH seniority because I believe that is fair, but I have no idea what others think about it.

Best wishes and sorry you are having furloughs at ACA.
 
Last edited:
Also, we may not get the luxury of choosing, I heard we (328 pilots) go witht the jets if transfered. That fine with me...I can use the Delta travel card and go to Spain on my days off...

I would love to stay at ACA, but I think that decision is beyond my control.

Almost forgot...I want to thank all the people who picked up open time while our 96 guys are on the street...thanks to you, more of our brethren will be joining them.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom