Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Miracle on the Hudson: brought to you by Union workers

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I think that was his point. With PCL saying he doesn't mind ceo's making 100mill, while pilots make 16k. As long as Alpo survives and gets their money...it's all goooood....
 
Fellas, fellas listen.... Lets look at unions for what they really do for us. Really..

Bottom line, why do we have unions? It isn't to protect our work rules, they are given away by ALPA. It isn't for pay, that is taken away. The reason we have unions is to make it more difficult to get fired if we mess up. Period. The rest of the time it is just an expense we pay, forced to pay, for 'protection' however you want to define that.

Unions aren't necessary. And how effective are they really when it comes to something like a merger where the same entity represents both pilot groups?

In the end they try to justify their own existance and expense. You guys can argue this point back and forth, blah, blah, blah but in the end unions are just revenue generators for their own cause.
 
Fellas, fellas listen.... Lets look at unions for what they really do for us. Really..

Bottom line, why do we have unions? It isn't to protect our work rules, they are given away by ALPA. It isn't for pay, that is taken away. The reason we have unions is to make it more difficult to get fired if we mess up. Period. The rest of the time it is just an expense we pay, forced to pay, for 'protection' however you want to define that.

Unions aren't necessary. And how effective are they really when it comes to something like a merger where the same entity represents both pilot groups?

In the end they try to justify their own existance and expense. You guys can argue this point back and forth, blah, blah, blah but in the end unions are just revenue generators for their own cause.


100% accurate!
 
Fellas, fellas listen.... Lets look at unions for what they really do for us. Really..

Bottom line, why do we have unions? It isn't to protect our work rules, they are given away by ALPA. It isn't for pay, that is taken away. The reason we have unions is to make it more difficult to get fired if we mess up. Period. The rest of the time it is just an expense we pay, forced to pay, for 'protection' however you want to define that.

Unions aren't necessary. And how effective are they really when it comes to something like a merger where the same entity represents both pilot groups?

In the end they try to justify their own existance and expense. You guys can argue this point back and forth, blah, blah, blah but in the end unions are just revenue generators for their own cause.

Oh, so you are one of those (idiots)who believe that seniority is a right and that a company will hire, upgrade, downgrade and furlough utilizing seniority even if no union is on property.

No union means the pilot who won't write up discrepancies and is willing to carry airplanes will upgrade first and keep his job in a downturn.

The "merit" system is a dangerous place to fly airplanes.

You dismiss unions as an unnecessary anachronism but I bet you have never flown jets for a company that had no union and a "merit" system.
 
today

They were certainly successful at bailing out, but they haven't been successful at building a functioning union. Over 2,000 USAirways pilots still refuse to pay dues. Not a single representative has been elected from the West domiciles. uSAPa is a mess.

They'll be back in another year or so. Count on it.
who is your controller
 
Oh, so you are one of those (idiots)who believe that seniority is a right and that a company will hire, upgrade, downgrade and furlough utilizing seniority even if no union is on property.

No union means the pilot who won't write up discrepancies and is willing to carry airplanes will upgrade first and keep his job in a downturn.

The "merit" system is a dangerous place to fly airplanes.

You dismiss unions as an unnecessary anachronism but I bet you have never flown jets for a company that had no union and a "merit" system.


Because an individual has a differing opinion doesn't make him an idiot. That comment does however, reflect your mentality.

You don't need a union to have seniority. As for your other conclusions, I have flown jets in a non union company and we did a fine job. We wrote up the problems and helped each other out when we could.

We can represent ourselves more effectively as we have a vested interest in the outcome, unlike a third party. Save a lot of money in the meantime.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top