Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Midwest getting new aircrafts????

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I know, CL. I'm just saying that most see the end here, and it doesn't make a difference. What good is unity if you have nothing to be unified about?

well we can SPECULATE all we want. we are still in contract negotiations this year and still must proceed with the assumption of the company surviving on an ongoing basis.
 
Back to the title of this thread, maybe the 14 aircraft (A319/320,B757) that big bad part owner NW are parking will be our MD80 replacement!
 
Back to the title of this thread, maybe the 14 aircraft (A319/320,B757) that big bad part owner NW are parking will be our MD80 replacement!

From what I heard is that when Airbus was visiting about two weeks ago, Boeing showed up at the same time without prior notice.
 
heard they are parking all 80s and furloughing another 70-100.
( this comes from a friend who works at MEH and the rumor was mentioned in the crew room)
 
heard they are parking all 80s and furloughing another 70-100.
( this comes from a friend who works at MEH and the rumor was mentioned in the crew room)

this was mentioned as an option for the fall if oil remains high.
 
How could that be an option? I know that the barbie jet burns less fuel, but it also has a $hitload less capacity and much higher lease payments/insurance. The 80 is the airlines heavy lift, long haul aircraft. Every single flight I have done this month has been full or oversold. If we park the 80's then Midwest will lose its hold on MKE. I could see them reducing the schedule this fall, but I doubt they will park the entire fleet. Unless oil is $200/barrel, then all bets are off. 8
 
How could that be an option? I know that the barbie jet burns less fuel, but it also has a $hitload less capacity and much higher lease payments/insurance. The 80 is the airlines heavy lift, long haul aircraft. Every single flight I have done this month has been full or oversold. If we park the 80's then Midwest will lose its hold on MKE. I could see them reducing the schedule this fall, but I doubt they will park the entire fleet. Unless oil is $200/barrel, then all bets are off. 8

Lets hope this does somthing,

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2008/06/gas_prices261.html

With Congress leading the way, the U.S. government appears ready to place limits on oil speculators who, some contend, have driven the price of oil far beyond what normal supply and demand would support. The [COLOR=red ! important][FONT=&quot][COLOR=red ! important][FONT=&quot]Commodity [/FONT][COLOR=red ! important][FONT=&quot]Futures [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=red ! important][FONT=&quot]Trading[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR] Commission said that as a first step, it will require London-based market traders to observe position limits employed by U.S. markets. The U.S. will also gain access to daily trading data from foreign oil markets.
But Congress, which Tuesday held hearings on oil market speculation, appears ready to go farther, limiting market access to entities that actually plan to take delivery of the oil. That would include energy wholesalers, refiners, and even direct users, such as Southwest Airlines, which has cushioned the impact of the oil spike by some savvy purchases in the [COLOR=red ! important][FONT=&quot][COLOR=red ! important][FONT=&quot]futures [/FONT][COLOR=red ! important][FONT=&quot]market[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR].
Legislation to limit speculation has quickly gained momentum in the House and Senate, much to the concern of some big time Wall Street players.
In fact, the Washington Post reports that lobbyists for Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley were among the financial interests beseeching lawmakers last week to forget about limiting speculation.
Quoting sources, the Post describes "sometimes testy" closed-door meetings in which hedge fund executives tried to make the case that their highly lucrative speculating in the oil futures market was actually helping the market operated more efficiently.
According to the report, lawmakers weren't buying it. One key aid reportedly told the executives there is nothing they can do to prevent Congress from passing legislation to curtail oil speculation.
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) says Congress has known since 2001 that there have been problems in the markets, but lawmakers have encountered strong Wall Street opposition whenever anyone has broached reform.
Unprecedented increases

Oil prices are up at least 40 percent since January, with prices setting almost-daily records. The price of crude has hit $140 a barrel and a growing number of lawmakers have begun to view speculation as the main reason.

 
How could that be an option? I know that the barbie jet burns less fuel, but it also has a $hitload less capacity and much higher lease payments/insurance. The 80 is the airlines heavy lift, long haul aircraft. Every single flight I have done this month has been full or oversold. If we park the 80's then Midwest will lose its hold on MKE. I could see them reducing the schedule this fall, but I doubt they will park the entire fleet. Unless oil is $200/barrel, then all bets are off. 8

because the 80 serves vacation / leisure destinations which are very LOW yield markets. you can have a 140 people going to vegas cheaply or 88 people going to DCA high a much higher yield.

airlines don't make money on domestic transcons in general, it is the more higher yielding routes that they monopolize where they make their cash.

latest rumor i heard was an MEH offer on some AAI 717's.
 
Last edited:
CL, what do you make of this last MEC update? apparently they met with seabury group on the 17th, they said its a very aggressive restructuring plan and a timeline and they stopped at that, a rumor on the line of some sort of an announcement coming tomorrow.
 
There are several talk with Timmy meetings tomorrow, I will try to attend one of them, hope for the best.

Not sure about the DFW incident
 
Any press releases or anything to verify? I hope it's not true. That would mean a lot more furloughs, wouldn't it?
 
Are all west coast flights going to have a flagstop at MCI?

My guess is they'll abandon the west coast and MCI altogether. No sense in stopping full airplanes with an already 0 yield. My buddy says the 17 can't even make FLL and RSW without restrictions. I figure once they park the 80's, they can wait a good 6 months before they have to do anything else. My other guess is the rest of Midwest will be done after the summer travel season of 2009. The merger will be done, and they (NW/Delta) can reassign mainline aircraft to what Midwest was doing, and shut Midwest down. They are making Midwest less and less viable, just so they can justify shutting it down altogether in another year. Again, good luck to all.
 
Any press releases or anything to verify? I hope it's not true. That would mean a lot more furloughs, wouldn't it?

Nothing on wall street yet, so it's prly just internal right now. I'm sure the union has got the notice.

There will likely need to be a WARN act filing if they plan to furlough the 150 folks that essentially make up the -80 staffing. I can't imagine MEH would continue to operate just 25 planes. They are looking at quite a few training events as well, since those on the 80 senior enough to avoid the furlough will go back to the 717.

Uhhg...this really sucks...
 
What terrible news. I am very sorry to hear this. This is the absolute worst industry to be in. Avation sucks.

GOULET!....former Skyway'er.
 
I think this thread has drifted enough.... Back on topic..

Does anyone have any new information on Midwest's new aircrafts?
 
I think this thread has drifted enough.... Back on topic..

Does anyone have any new information on Midwest's new aircrafts?

This is just my take on the situation: if they were to replace the 80's, that news would have been announced at the same time. Then again, this mgt team is not made up of the sharpest knives in the drawer.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom