What? There are no job losses from the merger silly! Anderson and Steenland told congress that. This is from the economy
I'm very, very close to getting out of this mess.
No kidding. Is there any accountability anywhere?
Good luck guys.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What? There are no job losses from the merger silly! Anderson and Steenland told congress that. This is from the economy
I'm very, very close to getting out of this mess.
Leases are binding contracts. The SAAB leases were renegotiated to 5 years during the bankruptcy, which had all the leases expiring in 2012. DAL is most likely going to pay a penalty for early termination of the lease. And as far as the line that the company is spewing of the economy. The Saab has one of the lowest CASM's in the DCI fleet and EAS cities are guaranteed income. There's more to this story than is being announced.I suspect the lease company wanted more money than Delta wanted to pay. The lease companies had a rate thrust down their throat from the bankruptcy and now I suspect they think that Delta should be paying market rate for the aircraft again. NorDelt doesn't agree. Unfortunately, I suspect that the lease company can get more money leasing to someone else. Who knows someone will blink but I doubt it.
That's what I was thinking. I thought for sure it was 2012 on the leases. There is a bigger game plan going on. The leak by the press on the reduction of the saabs forced management to address it.Leases are binding contracts. The SAAB leases were renegotiated to 5 years during the bankruptcy, which had all the leases expiring in 2012. DAL is most likely going to pay a penalty for early termination of the lease. And as far as the line that the company is spewing of the economy. The Saab has one of the lowest CASM's in the DCI fleet and EAS cities are guaranteed income. There's more to this story than is being announced.
I interpreted the obviously scrambled together at the last minute announcement as... because we're parking 10 planes, we will have a/c availability constraints, therefore we are withdrawing the EAS bids. In other words, we can't do these new EAS routes, plus what DL has planned for the fleet with just 39 planes.
EAS routes are never guaranteed profits. The company bids to cover the costs and then a 5% profit margin. If our costs go up, the profits go away as the contract terms don't get changed just because we are more expensive. In the end though, it does seem silly to get rid of a very low CASM a/c.
I thought t-props were all the rage again?[/QUOTE]
Nope, the new rage is the B.S. going on with Midwest and Republic.
More 200's -- maybe. Delta has a bunch of Comair 200's sitting around gathering dust.
I wouldn't hold my breathe on this.. DAL is already doing 2 for 1 swaps to reduce the 200 fleet system wide.
Those 5 ex freedom planes are junk. That's a horrible trade. I'd rather keep the Saabs and give back the 5 900s
You guys were bidding that EAS stuff, could this be a pull out to get cheaper rates? I don't know I am not that involved just throwing out all options. I think they should keep that saabs over the brazilias though.And what exactly are they trying to get out of us by doing this?
You guys were bidding that EAS stuff, could this be a pull out to get cheaper rates? I don't know I am not that involved just throwing out all options. I think they should keep that saabs over the brazilias though.
I am not sure how Delta is getting out of the Saab leases since they were renegotiated with Saab during the bankruptcy to last til 2012 ( very conviently the same as the pilot contract, any guesses why that was done)
Mesaba has the best safety record in the industry and the greatest pilot group around. So it only makes sense for Delta to reduce it.
Go Penguins.
A majority of those furloughed (if it comes to pass) will be individuals that had worked for other regionals and furloughed before. This is a bad situation, one XJ has seen to much of.Time for some low timers to head back to CFI'n.... it cant hurt them to
" pay some more dues " anyway.
Life isnt all puppy dawgs and ice cream brahs!
Its da 9!!!
With this reduction of SAAB's do you think that there is some dastardly plan to get the fleet to less than 79 so we have to give money back to the company?
I mean we got snap backs with an increase in airframes, is there some contingent to reverse the snap backs if we get smaller?
Was getting really nervous with all this happiness around Mesaba the last couple of years so this trouble is actually somewhat comforting.
-Battered Pilot Syndrome Sufferer