Mesa Bankruptcy could be 7/20

[Soverytired]

Couldn't agree more with your last statement. Now there is talk of re-regulation. Talk about the state of affairs in the Airline Industry?

Trojan

I wonder how "re-regulation" would affect lift providers?

Shouldn't a "re-regulated" industry favor actual airlines, not contracted lift? After all, the closest thing to government contracted lift is EAS, and that's a disaster for the taxpayer and the flying public.

Personally, I don't see it happening. But if it does, I think regional "airlines" should be careful what they wish for.

 

[USCtrojan]

I do. However, there are differences between being afraid of unforeseen possibilities, and basing behavior based on very real trends.

Oil is up. Way up. I think it's fair to say that this is a trend that will only accelerate in our lifetimes. It's pretty obvious the majors don't know what to do, not even Southwest. The fundamental economics of the airline business are changing, and you're going to see big changes in the next decade.

Bankruptcies are likely, and while I will certainly agree that Skywest has some excellent long term contracts, they will not come out unscathed when United and if Delta go bankrupt. Skywests biggest problem is that it isn't an airline, it's a "lift provider."

If no one needs the lift, they're out of business, or severely curtailed. CRJ's don't have good track runs of being "start up airlines", even when well funded.

I like Skywest. I wish I would have gone there 6 years ago. But I don't think I'd base my long term airline career on their (or any lift providers) enduring prospects.

When United goes Bankrupt? That's a hell of a forecast. It's a good possibility, but then again so is anything in this environment. If you base Oil right now going on forever, then I think you don't believe in a cyclical market. The dollar is very weak on a world scale and that will change--pretty soon. I'm not saying we'll see a monumental dip in oil, but it will sure help get rid of speculators and fear mongers. Which will only help. Assuming more consolidation, less capacity = higher yields. And the big ??? is the US Gov't and what they will do to mix things up.

Trojan

 

[USCtrojan]

I wonder how "re-regulation" would affect lift providers?

Shouldn't a "re-regulated" industry favor actual airlines, not contracted lift? After all, the closest thing to government contracted lift is EAS, and that's a disaster for the taxpayer and the flying public.

Personally, I don't see it happening. But if it does, I think regional "airlines" should be careful what they wish for.

Lift providers don't stand to lose assuming they have solid contracts, good service and good value (cost competitive). There are a lot of markets that need lift providers, I won't give you examples other than to look at ASA's route structure. The ebb and flow of the Airline Industry will not extinct them. The Airline Industry may need a little help and that might be in the form of Consolidation or $$$$. Either way you look at it, we're either at the bottom of our Economy and heading up or about to hit rock bottom and start heading up. It's gonna depend on the Banking Industry and the recovering US Dollar. Right now the US market is VERY CHEAP vs. Europe. Hopefully a lot of that money will flood back into the US. When it does our Economy will return along with all those much desired passengers.

Trojan

 

[Soverytired]

Yes and no. While I'm not conversant on the route structure of ASA, I suspect a fair (just fair, not majority) of it is to smaller cities using 50-70 seat RJ's.

With oil prices the way they are, airlines are looking to reduce frequency or eliminate entirely to smaller cities. A significant amount of traffic from smaller cities has traditionally been sold at a loss anyway, and the revenue has been made up when they get to the hub.

That sort of thinking will probably go away if oil continues to rise. At some point, a city will either get one/two flights a day from a large jet, or just be cut out of the route structure entirely.

Remember, in the days of "regulation", there hundreds of small cities that never had air service. Now that gas is expensive, and will continue to go up over the long haul, airlines will probably shrink to service their core markets.

Who knows though? I hope it's just another cycle. You're right about Europe. Ryanair makes huge profits . . . . with a fleet of 737's though, not contracted lift feeding the hubs though.

 

[rchcfi]

Fresh off the wire: (www.aviationtoday.com)

Chapter 11 May Not Work This Time
Chapter 11 may not be an option during this economic crisis, according to analysts speaking to Business Week, who think the capital to fund restructuring and exit bankruptcy will not be there since airlines are such a poor investment. This coupled with creditors, seeing the writing on the wall, forcing the sale of assets, does not bode well for Mesa which said that if Delta’s contract with Freedom is actually cancelled it could force a Chapter 11 filing by mid-July. Related Story The industry has already seen numerous carriers eliminated such as Aloha which went directly to Chapter 7 recently.


Mesa was also notified on May 22 that it does not comply with NASDAQ filing requirements for continued listing and could be "de-listed" from The NASDAQ Global Select Market. It has requested a hearing before a NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Panel to review the Staff Determination. The Notice arises as a result of Mesa's failure to timely file its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. On May 13, 2008, Mesa filed a notice with the Securities and Exchange Commission indicating that it was delaying the filing of its Form 10-Q until on or about May 20, 2008 and now intends to file the 10-Q on or about June 2, prior to its hearing.

 

[XPOO]

...while I will certainly agree that Skywest has some excellent long term contracts, they will not come out unscathed when United and if Delta go bankrupt.

You mean, like the way SkyWest was dealt irreparable harm the last time both Majors were in bankruptcy? Or would you like to change your statement to this: SkyWest, Inc. will once again be instrumental in helping BOTH United and Delta get through bankruptcy should either have to file again.

 

[zawillif]

Back to the title of this thread. The court hearings between Mesa and Delta are supposed to end today. Any news yet on the verdict?

 

[rickair7777]

Comair is in an excellent position for growth. Along with Compass and Mesaba.

Obviously, a major airline would prefer to make cuts at contractors before a wholly-owned.

However...I think all of the contractually-permited cuts have ALREADY been made. If the choice is to pay a contractor to NOT fly, or make cuts at a wholly-owned, it's pretty easy to see what's going to happen.

Of course I would not want to be at a contractor whose contract happens to expire in the immediate furure...that's what you call Wrong Place, Wrong Time.

 

[rickair7777]

I like Skywest. I wish I would have gone there 6 years ago. But I don't think I'd base my long term airline career on their (or any lift providers) enduring prospects.

UAL sucks...HOWEVER, pax don't seem to care if you suck or not, and customer satisfaction is not the name of the game right now...

The key to survival is financial endurance...

As it turns out UAL and DAL are better positioned in this regard than some other airlines. Airways and AMR are in the hurt-locker, and bringing up the rear in dead-last finanial position it looks like, you guessed it! Mesa Air Group :laugh:

Take a read, this article's rankings are based on finances (not operations) which appears to be the name of the game right now. And skywest is doing fine, thanks, second only to SWA...

http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=237841

 

[USCtrojan]

Yes and no. While I'm not conversant on the route structure of ASA, I suspect a fair (just fair, not majority) of it is to smaller cities using 50-70 seat RJ's.

With oil prices the way they are, airlines are looking to reduce frequency or eliminate entirely to smaller cities. A significant amount of traffic from smaller cities has traditionally been sold at a loss anyway, and the revenue has been made up when they get to the hub.

That sort of thinking will probably go away if oil continues to rise. At some point, a city will either get one/two flights a day from a large jet, or just be cut out of the route structure entirely.

Remember, in the days of "regulation", there hundreds of small cities that never had air service. Now that gas is expensive, and will continue to go up over the long haul, airlines will probably shrink to service their core markets.

Who knows though? I hope it's just another cycle. You're right about Europe. Ryanair makes huge profits . . . . with a fleet of 737's though, not contracted lift feeding the hubs though.

In order to fill those big planes, you have to have lift from other (smaller) planes. Putting a large aircraft that consistently fills itself @ 50-60% full is dumb if you can fill smaller (lift providers) near 100%. Yields go up as the capacity is less. Core markets? What does that mean? You mean Dothan, Valdosta, Augusta, Tallahassee will go away? I seriously doubt it. Yields for these markets are very high and will not benefit by fill an md88 at 40% full. Lift is lift. I agree, some markets will shrink capacity or go away, but a lot of those "feeder" routes fill your 767's going from ATL-LAX/ATL-CDG etc.

Oil is down over $4 as I write here. Our Economy will come back. Markets are cyclical, it ain't gonna sustain like this (and I dare say for not much longer). Unfortunately, Airlines tend to be the tail of our economy. If oil comes down, however, I think you may see a relatively quick recovery and a resuming of service in the not-so-stellar markets.

Trojan