FDJ2 said:As for the U situation, that's a whole different story and is not part of the RJDC lawsuit which seeks to abrogate the scope language in the DAL CBA.
Avoiding a question by attempting to answer with a series of new questions won't get off the ground with me.
The issue is Scope and the hypothesis in the RJDC Update is decidedly pertinent. Did your rread it? If you did not, I'll post it for you.
As soon as you have answered my questions, I will answer yours. C'mon, it's not that hard.
If that scenario were imposed on the Delta pilots, what would you as a Delta pilot do? Would you accept it or would you not?
You need to get it through your head that "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." Would you accept what you consider to be your flying controlled by another airline's Scope clause? Don't beat around the bush, it's a simple Yes or No.
Would you like your aircraft (whatever it may be) to be classified as a "permitted large aircraft type" and limited in number by another airline's Scope clause? Yes or No.
It's not rocket science.