Timebuilder
Entrepreneur
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Posts
- 4,625
I don't believe those things either, no do I take communion, nor do I pray to anybody's mother, yada, yada. Again, I suppose that puts you in the same bracket as the MAF pilot who ignorantly and incorrectly identified my beliefs (as if it were his business), and then condemned them. Police, Prosecutor, Judge. Sentenced. Thanks.
Good.
You might have noticed that I prefaced these assumptions with the words "if you mean."
If you mean something else, it is for you to articulate that, or risk being misunderstood.
I articulated a common set of beliefs regarding a group that is very large and describes themselves as being "Christian." If you failed to articulate your beleifs to a group that has a definite structure of doctrine based on the Bible (such as MAF), or if you mentioned a group affiliation that by name or doctrine is not Biblically based, then you can expect a conflict.
Not a prosecution, not a judgement, not a sentence. Just a recognition of a doctrine that does not agree with the Bible. You are welcome.
Use caution wherewith ye judge, for with what judgement ye judge, so therefore shall ye be judged. No?
Yes. Also:
2Corinthians 6:14 says "Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness?"
So, as believers, were are not to felllowship or partner with unbelievers, which explains the doctrinal requirement of MAF membership or organizations like them. We ARE to reach out to those who have not conformed to God's word. The "judgement" is His, and His alone. We are tasked with discernment.
Malachi 3:18 " Then you shall again discern Between the righteous and the wicked, Between one who serves God And one who does not serve Him.'
It seems without the benifit of such a discussion, the MAF pilot was quick to condemn, much like you. My own beliefs are quite irrelevant. I could be Southern Baptist, Progressive Episcopalian, Roman Catholic, LDS, Seventh Day Adventist, or even Buddhist (which permits one to be a Christian and still practice Buddhism with full compatability). You don't know. Yet without the benifit of that knowledge, so quick to judge, as you seem to feel you have all the answers.
Calling discernement a "judgement" is a defensive position, and not logically sound in the context of God's word. Since God's word is the foundation of this discussion, He is right. I just follow it. A Christian organization could not, using discernement, partner with several of the beliefs that you listed. That's Biblically based, and correct in obedience to His word. To do so would be, to use the popular term, ecumenical rather than Biblical.
So you see, I do know, because the inerrant Word has told me. If you have a better understanding, I invite you to show me where that understanding is based. Other than that, the MAF man may have been rude and behaved ignorantly, but he was not wrong to resist an ecumenical attitude in a Biblically based organization.
So tell me, shrine mercenary, who delivered you the power to interpret Calvary? Or to judge, in direct contravention to all counsel by Paul, and Christ? Further, when considering the ministry or the general interaction between the "Christian" and the "Gentile," was it not Christ who supped with the publicans, walked among the leppers, and who healed the ear of him come to take him to custody and kill him? (It was). For those "christians" who will not associate with others because of their (incorrectly) perceived beliefs...they're not very "christian," are they?
Well, despite your unjustifed judgement (see who is doing the judging here?) of "shrine mercenary" (whatever that means, it cannot be complimentary), believers are commanded to read and understand His Word, in prayerful guidance by God the Holy Spirit. Nothing is in contradiction to Paul or Christ.
Christ supped with publicans, tax collectors and such, because they needed a physician, meaning that He was there to minister to their spiritual needs, not to sit as an equal, or a social or business partner.
So, He was not taking them on, any of them, as disciples until He called them, such as he did with Saul of Tarsis on the road to Emmaus, and they believed in Him. Belief came first, partnering second. In that order.
To not partner, or be "unequally yoked" with unbelievers, is Biblical indeed, and unequivocal in its clarity. Nothing fuzzy at all. ALL of Christ's disciples and followers had repented of their former beliefs and activities before partnering with Christ.
That's the example I think you are missing.
I can't say if the devil is in your heart at all. I CAN tell you that if you reject the teaching of the Bible, you are rejecting the word of God, and God Himself, by extension. Even now, while days grow short, you are still called to kneel, and accept His word as truth.
That's up to you, and you alone.
Last edited: