JustaNumber
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2005
- Posts
- 922
"In this Captain's opinion" you have already flown around low level in central Florida without TCAS, or did you bring a hand held TCAS with you in your PA-44?
The pax deserve the safety of TCAS? No they don't. They deserve the safety of each and every FAR their government sets forth. Those FARs allow for an MEL and that MEL allows for the damn TCAS to be deferred. I should be charging a ground instruction fee here.
As to my "total abdication of Captain's authority"... Where did I do that? I supported the half the panel lights out at night guy. I even supported the RMI is only heading info if the Gens quit guy. I do not support the TCAS is broke so I ain't goin guy...plus he's a GIA weenie so right away I'm sure he's screwing something up.
I know it's tough to make it three whole days without your paper in flight, but put it down and look out the window and do your job.
Yes, I personally flew without TCAS while instructing low level in Florida, it was some of the most dangerous flying I've done, and I wouldn't put paying pax in that situation.
The pax only deserve the minimum level of safety guarranteed by the government? I'll bet you any amount of money that you go above and beyond that on every single flight. You do make decisions for yourself, right?
See and Avoid has been scientifically proven to be an inadequate means of collision avoidance. Let's say you're cruising at 250kts, and have a 270 degree field of vision. In 3 miles vis, you've got 22 seconds to see head-on traffic. But if you start looking over your left shoulder and scan each 10 degree segment for three seconds (which you would have to do since collision-course traffic has no relative motion), you would still be looking way left while you just got nailed. The Big Sky Theory is really what's keeping most GA aircraft apart, but that's relying on too much luck for me, particularly in high-density training areas.
My point about captain's authority is, you either give him complete authority to make the best choices as he sees them (be those choices right, wrong, or somewhere in the middle), or you give him no discretion. It's either or. The moment you start second guessing him, firing him for this safety decision but not that, then captain's authority doesn't really exist. You might as well just make him call the chief pilot any time there's a question about safety. And I would guess that a bottom-feeding operation's chief pilot is NEVER going to err on the side of safety. Allowing for complete captain's authority is not a perfect system, but I'll take it over your system.