Max Powers
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Posts
- 1,136
Occam, FDJ, and others,
Has anyone figured out how this deal makes financial sense for anyone other than maybe AirFrance / KLM?
Delta earlier announced some sort of a partnership with AirFrance that sounded like codeshare, but was obviously a whole lot more based on AirFrance's donation of Heathrow slots.
If we knew who benefitted, we could probably put more of this puzzle together.
Also - what about scope? Occam brings up the Airlinks and Connection carriers. I'm not sure who this will be a bloodbath for, what about these factors?
- Delta wants out of 50 seat contracts that are not voidable. They renegotiated with Republic holdings to upgrade their E135/145's for E170's to get out of 50 seat obligations
- Delta's VP of Ops said he likes the CRJ700/900 as a stop gap until the new generation 100 seat dreamliner tech airplane is brought to market
- NWA is parking some DC-9's. Obviously that airplane is close in capability to a big RJ, even if the -9 is much more comfortable.
- We all know ALPA's history on outsourcing, talk tough and then "surprise"
I floated the idea of a merger involving the connection / airlink carriers too based on a fleet type merger (staple) with date of acquisition fences/bidding and DOH longevity. No one was very interested.
Anyone else want to see "one list" result from this merger? With everyone brought to the negotiating table with "one" management, seems like there is an opportunity to get some flying back to "mainline" with the eventual goal of someday all flying being performed by pilots on "the" seniority list.
As is always the case the difference between opportunity and furlough is going to be scope.
Every Nobel economist has said "the money is in the deal itself" in the long run it is bad for everyone and I mean everyone.