Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Logging of flight time, when you never fly?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Nope, brightspark. I didn't say that. My opinion on the matter isn't particularly relevent.

You seem to think the world began about the time of the gulf of tonkin resoloution. It didn't. Logging practices to which I referred date back far before that time, back to when aviation began.

Do a little research.

As an OE-1 Pilot you didn't log taxi time or ground operations time as it's not standard military practice.

You may have noted that there's more to the flying community than flying in the military; one might consider it but one company, among many in a big, bright world. You may have noted that we're discussing logging of flight time for civil purposes and thus the regulations that applied to your logging at that time are hardly relevant.

You may also be aware that most companies apply a conversion factor to military time to account for ground operations time, typically two tenths per military hour. Or did you not know that??
 
mmm...OK, my reference to the military practice was an aside, an attempt at showing what the "standard practice" was before the introduction of the hobbs meter. My military experience is only a small portion of my background. Mostly it's civilian. All of my initial training in the late fifties/early sixties was in cubs, aeroncas, 172's, etc. paying by the clocked flight hour, T.O. to Landing Roll-Out, or by the engine tach. I didn't encounter the hobbs method - engine start til engine shutdown - until I saw flight schools build up for the G.I. Bill flight training in the mid-sixties.

That is my experience. You obviously have had a different experience. My training occured in the south with part 61 rentals at small airports. Probably the bigger pilot mills used the hobbs meter. I don't even know when it was implemented in mass around the country, but not in my experience in the early sixties.

You pose an interesting challange about doing some research. I honestly thought the practice of logging time was from T.O. to Landing. That was how it was introduced to me, and the regulation seemed to say exactly that.
The early days of flying was from an open field. You cranked 'er up, 'n run 'er up in the corner of the field and took off from that spot unless ya had to taxi around to another corner to ger 'er more into the wind. Then you landed so as to end the landing roll close to the parking spot.

To me, that sounds more like "moving under it's on power for the purpose of flight until after landing."

I think the rule was written when it did not take 20 or so minutes to taxi. At the time there was no need to be more specific, and I agree that some taxi and runup time should be included in the required training time for solo and private pilot, but after a period, and up to a point, it shouldn't be logged as flight time.

Most operators still use the tachometer to determine when the 100 hour is due.
To me, this is the best way to mechanically track time. There is a little wear at taxi idle and you should get a little credit, but not full credit.

At a small non-towered airport, the difference isn't so big, but I have seen flight schools at large busy airports where the wait-for-takeoff line is 20 minutes long. Add this to the run-up and taxi back after landing and you're talking 30 minutes out of a 1.5 flight. so you really have only an hour in the air.

If that was on the tach, it would be 1.1, maybe 1.2. Wouldn't you really rather have real air time for what you pay for?
 
If you taxi across a runway without a clearance, could you be violated? Why are taxi times so long in many places? Perhaps it is because there are many airplanes out there, and if you don't pay attention to your taxi it can jump up and bite you. The first time anyone flies into O'hare, Logan, JFK, DFW, etc... will quickly teach you that taxiing takes as much work as flying. Granted some airports are easier than others, but as a pilot you are still responsible for where you go, following the instructions of ATC, and maintaining safe operation of your aircraft. Why shouldn't that time be logged? Talk to any newly upgraded captain, who wasn't responsible for finding their way around on the ground for years as an FO, and many of them will tell you that the taxi phase is the toughest thing to adjust to on line.
 
I am totally 100% in favor of "taxi Training", or "runway incursion avoidance".

I know from my own stupid mistakes over the years about how difficult it can be to find your way to the appropriate ramp after having navigated halway across the continent...don't even get me started about this huge, big hole in our training. I think pilots should be limited to certain airport sizes until they recieve training in ground operations at large airports - like student pilots in Class B airspace. Our lack of training in this area is the precise reason there are so many runway incursions.

But it is not flight time.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom