get2flyin
Flyinawa!
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2004
- Posts
- 794
Agree with much of what you say here, but....
The misapplication of the term SCAB waters down the real meaning of the word. There are pilots who have scabbed at a lot of airlines (some which might hit close to home for ya), but Crimi isn't one of them.
As for whether Crimi is a bad choice, I disagree, but I will say that he's made some bad choices. Doesn't mean he can't do this particular job well though (and even, perhaps, better than your favorite candidate, even in protecting your interests....believe it or not, which I'm sure you won't.)
Whether or not you think Crimi deserves some sort of label due to his past choices has really become a matter of personal interpretation. I can avoid the labels. They aren't necessary in this discussion so let's let it drop. Perhaps he didn't cross a picket line, but he went to work for an airline that was created to bust a union. To bust HIS OWN union. He may use the excuse that he disregarded explicit instructions provided by his union for the purpose of obtaining valuable training in a CRJ...maybe he even did it for the type rating. But I'll call BS on this because let's be serious, even if you have a type rating, if you don't have at least 100 hours in the aircraft, it's worth nothing. NOTHING!!! Maybe the guy got a lot of flak and chose to bail, maybe he busted out, or maybe it was all part of his "big plan". What ever the reason, the man has a foul stink on him now that will (and rightfully so) follow him for the rest of his career. He's no longer a viable union leader in ANY capacity. The West side may have a guy or two who deserved a "label", but they aren't running for leadership positions, are they?
I know you guys don't care about this union, but it could be so much better than ALPA if we could find a way to get along. (FENCE)
While the union was created to steal MY job and transfer it to an unemployed East pilot, thanks to a number of legal challenges USAPA has been forced to represent ALL of its members. Under those guidelines, I agree the possibility exists that positive things could develop. Your fence idea, however, nullifies that possibility entirely. It basically sidesteps all forward progress to date and allows USAPA to continue focus on the East pilots. That option isn't, nor will EVER be, on the table.
Last edited: