Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Keep your speed up.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
hmmm said:
You are right I'm an a s s hole and you are both still dumb s hits who can't comprehend what you are reading.

Well, I am having some trouble comprehending the below paragraph, but that is beside the point.

Most Captains when flying with a pain in da ss FO who thinks they know the regs and the books like you guys think you do the Capt when they get to the hotel just wants to go to his room and get away from him.

Did I say I am a designated representative of the FAA and know how to read regs to try to piss you off some more. Is there any more ways I can try to piss you off let me know and I'll try. Will jumpseat to see you in person if it helps.



I think that all you need to do, is just keep posting. That will probably fullfill your needs which you express in the above paragraph.

You also mention that you have problems with guys that have 10,000 and 17,000 hours listed in their profiles. Why is that?

I have flown out of LGB on many occasions. You are under the Class B airspace, hence, 200 kts. When you hit LAX center, you are often told to disregard the speed restriction. I will only do that if the need is operational which it often is.

One time as I was climbing out of 7,000 ft, the LAX center controller told us to maintain 280 as soon as possible. We clarified that with the person and asked if they wanted it below 10,000. The just said again, as soon as possible. Clear as mud?

They did not want to take the responsibility to authorize the increased speed.

It was possible for us to increase out of 10,000.

ATP certificates are too expensive these days to save 2-3 minutes with speeds > 250 under 10,000

Only my opinion...
 
Bummer,


I thought this was a post about Kit Darby.
 
hmmm said:
I'm not an FAA guy. I am a FAA Designated Inspector. (Involved in interpretation with the FAA alot, and I love to argue) I said that to make a point along with the others references above as to the differences between a designee and a delegated representative of the administrator as are ATC.

What is a "Designated Inspector"? This is a title I've never heard of in the context you're using.

BTW, ATC is not the "administrator". ATC personnel are not regulators, and many aren't even on the FAA payroll. Whenever a regulation can be waived by ATC, the authority is written into the basic regulation ie. "except when authorized by ATC" etc. The real administrator has delegated flight operations waiver authority to Flight Standards. Therefore, whenever Part 91 speaks of "the administrator", it means your friendly FSDO Inspector. If ATC instructs a pilot to exceed 250 below 10,000, that ATC facility likely holds a waiver from Flight Standards that authorizes this. The only one I know of is Houston, but there might be more.
 
hmmm said:
You are right I'm an a s s hole and you are both still dumb s hits who can't comprehend what you are reading. Go back to grammar school.
Regardless of what arguments you attempt to make, you do not even have the capacity to write a sentence. Most of your posts are babelling run-on sentences that make no sense in and of themselves. I wouldn't be talking about other people's grammar skills. There is an example above where you go nine (9) lines on one sentence. The very first sentence you wrote in this thread is fundamentally flawed.

Not only do your sentences make no sense but neither do your arguments. It's absurd.

hmmm said:
...I have been involved in the regs since very young. [The regulations] are very clear cut if you know how to read...
hmmm said:
The regs are lot more grey that people think.
How's that for a contradiction--instead of pointing out your various grammar and argument flaws, I will let these two statements speak for your intellectual ability.
 
Originally posted by hmmm (underline added)
It saves getting ahead of traffic in line on approach witch gets you to the gate faster because of some sort of delay or weather or vectoring ATC gave you.
Do witches have to follow the 250 knot speed limit? Do broomsticks have to be registered with the FAA?
 
In order to maintain airspeed velocity, a swallow needs to beat its wings forty three times every second...
 
Hmmm is incorrect. Controllers do not have authority to waive the 250 knot speed restriction, except where expressly authorized by the administrator. It is not at the discretion of any individual controller.

A controller who provides a verbal clearance to exceed this speed retriction is not authorized to do so, and following this clearance does not protect one from enforcement action. Following Hmmm's advice can lead to unpleasant certificate action.

One must assume that Hmmm is a flamer, else he understands very little of the regulation, and it's attendant legal interpretation.

I also represent the administrator, and have NO authority to interpret the regulation, nor in any way to authorize deviation from the regulation. Go figure.
 
We asked an AZO radar controller and this person said..."if it prevents a situation from developing (ex. an aircraft slowing its rate of decent at 10000 to slow down below 250 could have potential conflicting traffic if the rate of decent is slowed for too long) then they will do it."

FAR's or not I'd bet lots of controllers use this often.

Drew
 
Data said:
In order to maintain airspeed velocity, a swallow needs to beat its wings forty three times every second...


AHHH, but is that an African Swallow, or a European Swallow???
 
dmspilot00: Do witches have to follow the 250 knot speed limit? Do broomsticks have to be registered with the FAA?


Broomsticks are considered experimental, right?
 
witches on broomsticks

Nope! Witches are in the same catagory as deadly weapons. Same as my 7mm Remington magnum caliber deer rifle. Muzzle velocity at five feet AGL is over 3000 feet per second. Never had the FAA warn me about that.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top