TWA Dude
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 3,666
While that's a true statement it also ignores the strengths of ALPA: sheer numbers and political influence. Let's take a hypothetical that every airline has its own in-house union. Sure, they'd each be represented nicely but would this scenario adequately protect the profession as a whole more effectively than one union for all pilots? Notice how other unionized groups have not felt it desirable to go independent en masse?This is the heart of ALPA's problems....we are a loose association of independant pilot groups that look out for ourselves before we look out for anyone else.....That won't work regardless of the alphabet name that represents us.....
I'm no ALPA cheerleader; just a pragmatist. I see greater good coming from all airline pilots belonging to one union. There are problems, BIG problems in ALPA, but I don't see dozens of independent unions solving anything.
What lesson is that? The pilot group that whines the loudest should get whatever it wants?USAPA won't unify the pilots anymore or any less than ALPA....but it will teach ALPA a lesson......
The USAirways (East) pilot's group problems aren't with ALPA. ALPA is merely their scapegoat. Their problems are a result of bankruptcies and a sense of entitlement. USAPA or any other union will not solve these problems. The USAPA drive is only about one thing: trying to get around binding arbitration. The law is not on their side.