Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

JL Dumps Air Tran Stock

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Not defending the man but he is in his sixties may have some health issues and probably wants to have some fun before he checks out. Why would he want to hold on to it anyway? BF made it clear that the stock is not really going to go anywhere for quite a while.
 
Where did "Forklift Joe" come from... never heard that!

JL was the director of mx at AA and approved of their engine changing operation on the dc10. douglas called for the engine to be removed from the pylon and JL and the rest of the airlines found out it was cheaper to simply remove the pylon with the engine connected to it (if memory serves me the pylon was simply held on with 3 bolts). AA would use a forklift to support the entire engine assembly (engine and pylon) and then disconnect the pylon. one day while in the middle of an engine change (#1 engine) in tulsa it became lunchtime and the crew left with the forklift supporting an assembly with some of the bolts missing. during the lunch break the forklift bled off hydraulic preessure and weakened the remaining connections for the assembly.

this aircraft eventually lost the entire #1 assembly on takeoff from 32R at ORD. AA was too cheap to buy two stick shakers and the CA's stick shaker was on the left generator which was on runway 32R. the FO, the flying pilot, flew a perfect V1 cut and climbed out at V2. when the engine assembly flew off it tore the hydraulic lines in the left wing and all pressure in that system bled down. unfortunately hydraulic pressure held the left slat assembly in place, but without pressure the air force shoved the slat assembly back into the left wing causing it to stall. the crew unaware of the impending stall could do nothing as the airplane's left wing stalled, the a/c banked to the left, and impacted the ground killing everyone on board and some people on the ground. it was the biggest aviation disaster in the continental united states.

during the various lawsuit trials it came to light AA had shredded lots of documents detailing all their mx procedures and the ntsb discovered all airlines were using this technique for engine changes on the dc10. they grounded the dc10 for a little while as the pylons were inspected. AA though actually made quite a bit of money on this accident through insurance payouts.

another sad part to this was the flying CA on 191 was scheduled to simply go home. the original CA for 191 asked this CA if he wanted to fly this flight (as I believed the new CA had family in LAX).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_191
 
SOOO let me try to understand the logic, Joe was running the forklift that day? Or was it Joe that told the crew to take lunch and leave the forklift in place? Or was it Joe who approved the proceedure? And Joe ordered the airplanes without stickshakers? Was joe loading bags too?
 
Last edited:
SOOO let me try to understand the logic, Joe was running the forklift that day? Or was it Joe that told the crew to take lunch and leave the forklift in place? Or was it Joe who approved the proceedure? And Joe ordered the airplanes without stickshakers? Was joe loading bags too?

It was the procedure.

"The findings of the investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) were released on December 21, 1979.[1]. It revealed the probable cause to be attributable to damage to the left wing engine pylon that occurred during an earlier engine change at American Airlines's aircraft overhaul facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Evidence came from the flange, a critical part of the pylon assembly. It was revealed to be damaged before the crash, and investigators looked at the plane's maintenance history and found it was serviced eight weeks before the crash. The pylon was damaged due to an ill thought-out engine removal procedure. The original procedure called for removal of the engine prior to the removal of the engine pylon. To save time and costs, American Airlines, without the approval of McDonnell Douglas, had begun to use a faster procedure. They instructed their mechanics to remove the engine with the pylon all together as one unit. A large forklift was used to support the engine while it was being detached from the wing. This procedure was extremely difficult to execute successfully, due to difficulties with holding the engine assembly straight while it was being removed.
The procedure used for maintenance did not proceed smoothly. If the forklift was in the wrong position the engine would rock like a see-saw and jam against the pylon attachment points. The forklift operator was guided by hand and voice signals; the position had to be spot-on or could cause damage, but management was unaware of this. The modification to the aircraft involved in flight 191 didn't go smoothly; engineers started to disconnect the engine and pylon but changed shift halfway through; when work continued, the pylon was jammed on the wing and the forklift had to be re-positioned. This was important evidence because, in order to disconnect the pylon from the wing, a bolt had to be removed so that the flange could strike the clevis. The procedure used caused an indentation that damaged the clevis pin assembly and created an indentation in the housing of the self-aligning bearing, which in turn weakened the structure sufficiently to cause a small stress fracture. The fracture went unnoticed for several flights, getting worse with each flight that the plane had taken. During flight 191's takeoff, enough force was generated to finally cause the pylon to fail. At the point of rotation, the engine detached and was flipped over the top of the wing."
 
SOOO let me try to understand the logic, Joe was running the forklift that day? Or was it Joe that told the crew to take lunch and leave the forklift in place? Or was it Joe who approved the proceedure? And Joe ordered the airplanes without stickshakers? Was joe loading bags too?

look i just piss excellence ok? shake and bake!

he simply asked where the nickname came from and i told him. joe was the Mx jefe. that means the buck stops with him. he's the one who approved the cost saving measure at AA. valujet management got blamed for what they approved and looked the other way for. do you defend them for what they physically didn't do but were responsible for?

why do you love him and his hair piece?
 
Last edited:
Funny how Joe takes the heat for what everyone else was doing.. People need to do some research..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_191

This method of engine-pylon removal was used to save man hours and was encouraged despite differences with the manufacturer's specifications on how the procedure was supposed to be performed. The accident investigation also concluded that the design of the pylon and adjacent surfaces made the parts difficult to service and prone to damage by maintenance crews. According to the History Channel[9], United Airlines and Continental Airlines were also using a one-step procedure. After the accident, cracks were found in the bulkheads of DC-10s in both fleets.
 
Last edited:
Funny how Joe takes the heat for what everyone else was doing.. People need to do some research..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_191

This method of engine-pylon removal was used to save man hours and was encouraged despite differences with the manufacturer's specifications on how the procedure was supposed to be performed. The accident investigation also concluded that the design of the pylon and adjacent surfaces made the parts difficult to service and prone to damage by maintenance crews. According to the History Channel[9], United Airlines and Continental Airlines were also using a one-step procedure. After the accident, cracks were found in the bulkheads of DC-10s in both fleets.

Geez....what's wrong with you?? You want people to speak in terms or reality and facts, and not emotion?? Your expectations are sooooo high. :D
 
Joe Leonard was the boss. His department didn't do things right. By coincidence, some other airline's departments were also doing something un-right.

That doesn't diminish the FACT (pesky things, them!) that Joe's department cut a corner that led to the worst single-aircraft accident in US airline history.

I'm sure he's shed any personal accountability for that tragedy. Amoral scumbags are funny that way...

Let the record reflect there were plenty of other operators who were doing the procedure correctly, and managed to earn a profit at the time.

"Other people did it too!" is not a rational defense for complicity with a dangerous act.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top