SellingDirt
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2006
- Posts
- 57
aeronautic1 said:hey this 135 pilot will give you $50 for a ride in the back
you can buy a full fare ticket for cheaper than that!:beer:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
aeronautic1 said:hey this 135 pilot will give you $50 for a ride in the back
chperplt said:I was charged $25 while attempting to JS from BUR-MCO last weekend. I was told that because the plane was half full, I couldn't "jumpseat" and had to pay the $25 non rev fee...
8vATE said:AND ONCE AGAIN, THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PILOTS!
Dirty Sanchez said:Charge Airtran pilots the $25 and don't allow any Delta pilots if there is more than one jumpseater. Justice.
chperplt said:This is the biggest problem with this website. There is so much bullcrap that goes on here, a real issue gets laughed at as complete BS.
I've PM everyone of you that has asked for details. I paid with a credit card and I have the receipt to prove it.
I was also told that I (everyone) has to be in complete uniform to occupy the jumpseat. Business attire was not acceptable.
Guys.... This is going on. I'm sure it's not limited to Burbank.
JP4user said:This should get interesting.
DIAMONDDD said:So exactly how much is it going to cost OAL pilot jumpseaters with this new change?![]()
Longhorn said:Exactly....
This has NOTHING to do with pilots. Our JS policy towards F/A's is that we take anyone. Our FA's have become very frusterated that every airlines fa's can jumpseat on us but they cannot jumpseat on them. There are only a few airlines that allow our FA's to jumpseat on them. For them they would NOT be charged. The F/A's who do not have an recipricol agreement would be charged, the reason would be to help aquire a recip agreement to make the charge go away. Many of us here do not agree with charging anyone to jumpseat...but on the other end its not fair that our FA's are not allowed to JS on every other 121 airline that allows fa jumpseaters. We have the most lenient js poilcy in the buisness. No caps, no limits...open seat its yours. Our FA's should be able to js on others.
32LT10 said:I agree with the charging for non-reciprocating carriers. It makes sense and will at least put pressure on those that enjoy the benefit to change or pay. I wish we had a policy like yours to accept F/A's from offline carriers.
Longhorn said:T-Gate...I know you may know him but there is no way that happened. If for some reason it did, the gate agent needs to be canned.
flt number please and date........
I didnt think so.
DonVerita said:Hey...flame moron! You and BrainHurts need to get your head out of each others a$$.
AirTran DOES NOT charge for the JUMPSEAT. This has been posted over and over again. Learn to read you idiot!
For every AirTran aircraft, if there is ONE jumpseat installed then they take ONE jumpseat rider ** NO CHARGE **. If there are TWO jumpseats installed then they take TWO jumpseat riders **NO CHARGE **. What don't you understand about this?
Anyone who comes up to the gate after the jumpseat has already been taken then becomes a NON-REV passenger. That person may purchase a NON-REV GATE PASS on the spot at the gate for $25....or he/she may choose to wait for the next flight and be the first jumpseater in line for that flight.
Know what you're talking about next time.
DonVerita said:AirTran DOES NOT charge for the JUMPSEAT. This has been posted over and over again. Learn to read you idiot!
I hear ya chper! This place has become the Jerry Springer of forums. Everything is either flame bait or BS! I hardly post any more for fear of being slammed by some pathetic prick like einstien/limp lizard! Or the continuous lies of the rjdc!chperplt said:This is the biggest problem with this website. There is so much bullcrap that goes on here, a real issue gets laughed at as complete BS.