Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

JetBlue CEO on pilot’s mid-air meltdown: ‘It started medical, but clearly wasn’t’

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
That's one hell of an assumption you just made. Why don't you find out the facts before you say something you'll regret later?

Right or wrong, could you imagine what jetBlue's liability would be if he was allowed to fly and he goes off the reservation again?
 
Which is something to be decided once the facts are in.

There aren't many "facts" that will make this episode acceptable or mitigate future liability if he were to be a captain on a revenue flight again and has another "episode", even with "facts".

It is unfortunate, and I am not prejudging, or judging at all. He became ill in some respect (hopefully). But after having shown himself susceptible to an episode like this, the corporate liability and PR would probably be intolerable.

Just my humble opinion. I do wish him and his family the best, and hope the outcome is better than I fear it is.
 
I don't know. I am sad and disappointed that they would criminalize an illness or sickness. I never thought it would be a crime to be sick. Now there may still be more to the story. We just don't know.

But, your first problem is getting your "news" from Fox, but that is a different topic all together...
 
It's just a sad event. He is being treated in a hospital! He is clearly sick. Since when do we criminalize being sick?
 
JetBlue pilot's wife speaks out, asks for privacy

The wife of the JetBlue pilot whose in-flight behavior prompted a high-profile diversion last week used a Sunday statement to both thank well-wishers and ask for privacy.

"First, we would like to thank all those who have expressed concern and kind thoughts during this difficult time," Connye Osbon, wife of JetBlue Captain Clayton Osbon, said in a statement issued Sunday by JetBlue. "We appreciate the public's interest in our family's current situation and in Clayton's well-being."


FULL TEXT: Statement by Connye Osbon on behalf of the Osbon Family (JetBlue)
RELATED: JetBlue pilot's meltdown: No one saw it coming
RELATED: JetBlue pilot faces federal charges


However, Osbon also made a plea for privacy as her family deals with the fallout of the apparent emotional duress her husband suffered on Flight 191 on March 27.


"At this time, we ask that the media respect our wishes for privacy," Osbon said in her statement. "We understand the public's interest in speaking with Clayton and family members, but we respectfully decline all interview requests and will not be making further statements."


Osbon's statement also included gratitude the "crew and passengers of Flight 191 for their effective yet compassionate handling of the situation."


Osbon added that "while (husband Clayton) was clearly distressed," she said "it is our belief" that "he was not intentionally violent toward anyone."


"We know you were placed in an awful situation and we appreciate your ability to respond professionally," Osbon said in addressing the crew and passengers on the flight.


The Associated Press adds "JetBlue said Friday that the crew also was declining to speak publicly about the event."
 
It's just a sad event. He is being treated in a hospital! He is clearly sick. Since when do we criminalize being sick?

Sadly we've been doing that for many, many years now... this is nothing new.
 
Maybe...just maybe...these Feds who seem so out of control have more info that we do. Just as I'm not for waiting for the facts to protect the pilot, I'm not quite ready to have him walking the streets again without a bit info. Maybe we need to let the authorities have time to investigate as well. If the worst tragedy out of all this is one guys loses his medical/job, then we got lucky. It could have been much, much worse.
 
Maybe...just maybe...these Feds who seem so out of control have more info that we do. Just as I'm not for waiting for the facts to protect the pilot, I'm not quite ready to have him walking the streets again without a bit info. Maybe we need to let the authorities have time to investigate as well. If the worst tragedy out of all this is one guys loses his medical/job, then we got lucky. It could have been much, much worse.

Well said...

The only thing I would add is "but for the grace of God go I." Enough stress can break anyone. It simply takes the right personal factors at the right time (or the "wrong time" if you will). Not one of us on here knows what really happened, and maybe being held really is what's best for him (long term) and his family...
 
All "speculation". Did he ever actually do anything contrary with the flight controls? What did he do other than exercise his freedom of expression? Did his words cause the plane to turn upside down? The prosecuter will have nothing to stand on when its over with. I think his attorney will eat them alive before its over with.

Yes and yelling "fire" in a crowded movie theater is allowed also.

Freedom of expression, of course.

:laugh:
 
Who is paying Clayton's legal fees?

Have the jetBlue pilots taken up a collection to help out Clayton?

I know if this had happened at my airline the pilot brethren would rally to his support.
 
Supposedly Jetblue is providing legal support. The curious part is how effective can they be. With a union legal would be doing EVERYTHING they could to keep him out of jail, get him the proper medical treatment and even get his medical back.
Is Jetblue truly going to represent him? Do they really want him getting his medical back? Would they want him as a line pilot again?
This are all huge question marks. Jetblue is playing both sides of the fence and eventually they will pick a side. Hmmmm, which side will it be.
 
Supposedly Jetblue is providing legal support. The curious part is how effective can they be. With a union legal would be doing EVERYTHING they could to keep him out of jail, get him the proper medical treatment and even get his medical back.
Is Jetblue truly going to represent him? Do they really want him getting his medical back? Would they want him as a line pilot again?
This are all huge question marks. Jetblue is playing both sides of the fence and eventually they will pick a side. Hmmmm, which side will it be.

I don't think anyone will be able to get his medical back. Even if that happens, he won't be flying people around. Putting him in the cockpit would be commercial suicide for jetblue. Sad, but true.
 
JetBlue does what is best for JetBlue. Right now the best thing for JetBlue to do is play stand by your man. When it no longer is beneficial to JetBlue's public image they will cut bait. How can it possibly be in anyone's best interest to only have company paid attorneys represent you in your time of need? This is what the majority of individuals that make up the pilot "group" at JetBlue have voted for whether they knew it or not.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top