It's official. Pinnacle mgt asking for 5% paycut for pilots

[saabservant]

Hey, I'm ex-mesaba and furloughed from a major, working for a large regional, right seat. that sucks, but I'm grateful to be flying! Reading all this, I'm glad to be away from it, even if making no money. Keep it all in perspective, folks, and best wishes.....

But, JUST SAY NO when the company and the "union" offer concessions to entice bargaining. IT DOES NOT WORK.
Alpa will always "live to fight another day", instead of standing up for professional standards for pay and QOL. Hence our present way of life.....remember, your "regional" contract is signed by alpa national, NOT your local or mec reps (who, by the way, are some of the best folks you can meet and work with- they really do care)
They (alpa natl.) don't care about the working conditions for over half the pilots flying domestically. They do care about keeping the DUES coming in......just my .o2....

 

[Flyer1015]

You are not very smart.

I'm educated better now on the whole SLI fiasco. I've personally seen the email chains. You know who wasn't very smart? JH, JW, and PS. What I'd like to know is what JH did to get PS onboard the Colgan staple idea. By proposing a staple, the committee did not represent the needs and desires of the Pinnacle group fairly. These 3 need to be held accountable. No pilot group told them to go and propose a damn staple! Idiots.

 

[suupah]

I'm educated better now on the whole SLI fiasco. I've personally seen the email chains. You know who wasn't very smart? JH, JW, and PS. What I'd like to know is what JH did to get PS onboard the Colgan staple idea. By proposing a staple, the committee did not represent the needs and desires of the Pinnacle group fairly. These 3 need to be held accountable. No pilot group told them to go and propose a damn staple! Idiots.

was this your stance at the time?

 

[On Your Six]

I'm educated better now on the whole SLI fiasco. I've personally seen the email chains. You know who wasn't very smart? JH, JW, and PS. What I'd like to know is what JH did to get PS onboard the Colgan staple idea. By proposing a staple, the committee did not represent the needs and desires of the Pinnacle group fairly. These 3 need to be held accountable. No pilot group told them to go and propose a damn staple! Idiots.

Sorry, but Richard Bloch determined the fair way to do it, but unfortunately your company couldn't afford it.


Godspeed!


The OYSter

 

[Flyer1015]

was this your stance at the time?

YES. I never wanted a staple of any pilot group. I may have joked about a 3 to 1 against Mesaba but that's only because that was the deal the flight attendants were getting, and I wasn't serious about it.

Sorry, but Richard Bloch determined the fair way to do it, but unfortunately your company couldn't afford it.

What's fair about a Colgan pilot hired in January 2008 now senior to a Mesaba pilot hired in 2000? Fair is hardly the word I'd use to describe the SLI or its conditions and restrictions.

 

[On Your Six]

YES. I never wanted a staple of any pilot group. I may have joked about a 3 to 1 against Mesaba but that's only because that was the deal the flight attendants were getting, and I wasn't serious about it.



What's fair about a Colgan pilot hired in January 2008 now senior to a Mesaba pilot hired in 2000? Fair is hardly the word I'd use to describe the SLI or its conditions and restrictions.

Bloch looked at everthing brought to the table, and decided what was fair. Some people might not like it, but he had no outside influence, called it like he saw it, and was paid a standard fee. That's called binding arbitration.


Godspeed!


The OYSter

 

[titans10]

YES. I never wanted a staple of any pilot group. I may have joked about a 3 to 1 against Mesaba but that's only because that was the deal the flight attendants were getting, and I wasn't serious about it.



What's fair about a Colgan pilot hired in January 2008 now senior to a Mesaba pilot hired in 2000? Fair is hardly the word I'd use to describe the SLI or its conditions and restrictions.

Samething happen during the delta/onward merger. 2000/2001 hires at nwa in with 2007/2008 hires at delta. The list is what it is. Nothing you can do about it. Unless, you want to be bitter the rest of your time at PNCL. Good luck.

 

[filejw]

Samething happen during the delta/onward merger. 2000/2001 hires at nwa in with 2007/2008 hires at delta. The list is what it is. Nothing you can do about it. Unless, you want to be bitter the rest of your time at PNCL. Good luck.

Well we could have a union that is date based for seniority, with restrictions of course. What gets me is ALPA collected dues from those 2000 hires an didn't protect their seniority.ALPA outsources its most important duty to an arbitrator. Seniority rules should be set in stone by the BOD , they are just afraid of the work that need to be done.

 

[XJohXJ]

Well we could have a union that is date based for seniority, with restrictions of course. What gets me is ALPA collected dues from those 2000 hires an didn't protect their seniority.ALPA outsources its most important duty to an arbitrator. Seniority rules should be set in stone by the BOD , they are just afraid of the work that need to be done.

I couldn't possibly agree with you more. Thank you for a succinct summary of the tremendous problem with the PNCL merger.

 

[PCL_128]

remember, your "regional" contract is signed by alpa national, NOT your local or mec reps

Wrong. The ALPA President doesn't even get the CBA until after the local Negotiating Committee and MEC Officers have signed it. They make the decision, and the ALPA President only gets it after they have agreed to it.

Seniority rules should be set in stone by the BOD , they are just afraid of the work that need to be done.

Wrong. The BOD isn't "afraid" of it, the BOD has determined that trying to set those kinds of rules in stone is ridiculous, because every merger is different and turns on its own facts. A DOH merger for one carrier may make perfect sense, but it would make zero sense for another merger. That is why we have negotiations, mediation, and binding arbitration.

 

[WMUSIGPI]

Wrong. The ALPA President doesn't even get the CBA until after the local Negotiating Committee and MEC Officers have signed it. They make the decision, and the ALPA President only gets it after they have agreed to it.



Wrong. The BOD isn't "afraid" of it, the BOD has determined that trying to set those kinds of rules in stone is ridiculous, because every merger is different and turns on its own facts. A DOH merger for one carrier may make perfect sense, but it would make zero sense for another merger. That is why we have negotiations, mediation, and binding arbitration.[/QUOTE]

Because there are no guts to creat a NATIONAL seniority list. Create that list and mergers become a non issue.

 

[PCL_128]

Because there are no guts to creat a NATIONAL seniority list. Create that list and mergers become a non issue.

It's not an issue of "guts." ALPA created the Career Security Protocol Committee (CSPC), which was responsible for determining how to move forward with a national seniority list or something similar. They completed their work last year. Unfortunately, they found the same thing that every other group that has worked on this issue has found: the individual pilot groups just won't support it. Every time this is tried, you get the same thing: the pilot groups that are furloughing or stagnated demand a national list, and the other pilot groups refuse to even consider it. The comical thing is that the pilot groups switch every time it comes up. Last time, the UAL guys were fighting it, because they had 3-year upgrades at the time. This time, they were the ones who proposed the idea!

To put it simply, pilots are selfish. If it works in their favor, they want a national list. If it doesn't, then they oppose it. Until that changes, then no initiative by ALPA will fix it.

 

[Adam]

Not only are we selfish, but greedy and dumb. We are the enemy.

 

[xjhawk]

OY6, remember one thing-this is very important. The term fair is relative to your perception.

I sat in a a ALPA meeting where on a slide show presentation, they had a number of things listed as what was ALPA merger policy. One of the words that was larger than the rest, in bold lettering, was "LONGEVITY". That it must be respected. When I brought this very slide up, and how our arbitrator did not respect mine and many others longevity. They tried to deflect my question every way possible. I want my 4-5 years of ALPA dues back, as I was not represented in those years-as my LONGEVITY was $hit on.

Oh and for those of you at Pinnacle who think our concessions will save this train wreck, Guess what? PInnacle cannot cancel out the Block decision without a bankruptcy. Pinnacle cannot cancel lease's without BK.

Does anyone know the verbage in the ASA on the provisions Delta has if Pinnacle declares BK? I am sure there is some back room handshakes going on as there are Delta reps on Pinnacles board.

 

[jynxyjericho]

Not only are we selfish, but greedy and dumb. We are the enemy.

Add to that, "wanna-be white collar smug snobs". We are absolutely the greatest hurdle to our own success.