Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Is this profession in peril?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
After all the mergers, the regional airlines will be the place to be due to the furloughs and such. No more flow backs either. I feel pretty confident, AND I don't have to worry about being some lame gear jerker, either.

I'll leave that to all you guys. LOL

Pocono,
I disagree, if industry consolidation does happen, then the unions at the remaining airlines will have more power. One area where they will flex there power is with scope clauses, which will favor the mainline pilot over over the commuter pilot.
 
Without that kind of solidarity, you could have the best Leadership in the world and you won't accomplish jack crap.

I think you are confused. Solidarity [unity] is what gets things done! I'll take unity over gross participation any day...and they are separate things.
 
Stop Whinning!!!

Nothing but whinning, this is still a great career
 
Last edited:
I believe the last time I saw doctor's strike was about five years ago in Pennsylvania. Could be wrong on the state. They went on strike to protest outrageously high malpractice insurance. Cannot remember the last time my pilot group went on strike. Thats right, we never have. We continue to give and give! I just googled doctors strke america. Not only have doctors struck, they have picketed as well. You were saying?

You're correct; google's a wonderful thing. I've opened mouth and inserted foot.

I don't know which pilot group you're with, but it seems like UALALPA is setting up a picket line somewhere every month or so. We had one on 1 Feb in Sacramento; 30 pilots showed. On the same day, we had one in Oakland; 4 pilots showed. We had one 23 Jan in Detroit; 7 UAL, 2 NWA, and 1 Spirit pilot showed (it was a UAL picket). We had one 18 Jan in Schaumberg, IL outside of Motorola; 16 pilots showed. We had one 20 Dec at DCA; 5 UAL, 1 DAL, and 1 ALPA National showed (it was a UAL picket).
How effective is picketing as a tool when you do it so often that it's not even noticed by the media?

In the above pickets, the stated objective was to "bring to light the corporate greed that permeates upper management of our airline." Great. When you use picketing so often with very few turning out, how effective is it? IMO, it's the wrong tool and it ends up being counterproductive.
Tilton's response to pilot pickets last summer was to call them a vocal minority. That's the problem with overusing picketing as a tool.
 
Nothing but whinning, this is still a great career
You edited your post for "speiling," but still couldn't get "whinning" spelled correctly? If you're going to call us whiners, then at least spell it properly. Or better yet, get back to work. Does USA Jet know that one of their overpaid managers spends a lot of his time at work on an internet message board? Don't you have a memo to distribute or something? :rolleyes:
 
Biggest problem at this moment: The guys running things have a fundamental difference of vision. Prater believes there are two different futures right now. Prater wants to trade on every hot issue of the day to hoard for his generation. He simultaneously believes the next generation of pilots are a near lost cause and too expensive to champion. TD at CAL was the same sort and we just got rid of him, thankfully.

Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. The mechanisms in place for a disenchanted membership are limited. Look at how union leaders are elected. It's Tammany Hall politics at it's best.

Did the membership vote for/against prater and woerth? No; that was done by our MEC representatives. Did any MEC reps ask their membership who they wanted? Not that I know of.

The advantage of having an inhouse union is that the membership can vote for their Chair. Unless ALPA's bylaws change, the rank and file have no vote for ALPA BOD members.
 
Interesting concept.
I'd personally like to see alpa's bylaws rewritten to make it less of a kleptocracy (which is what alpa has evolved into) and more of a direct democracy.
Also, ALPA has not and can not represent "regional" airline pilots, due to obvious conflicts of interest. Therefore, regional airline pilots perhaps should consider a national organization the way things stand now. Actually, if gratuitous distinctions, such as "regional airline pilot" were eliminated, then one national pilot professional organization might work.
 
Also, ALPA has not and can not represent "regional" airline pilots, due to obvious conflicts of interest. Therefore, regional airline pilots perhaps should consider a national organization the way things stand now. Actually, if gratuitous distinctions, such as "regional airline pilot" were eliminated, then one national pilot professional organization might work.

One union representing two pilot groups with competing interests is the problem here. In a word, scope.
alpa does not do Pinnacle pilots justice when it pushes for tighter scope restrictions for Northwest. Conversely, alpa does not do Northwest pilots justice when it pushes for looser scope restrictions at Pinnacle. The two groups' interests are mutually exclusive.
 
PCL - why don't you go award yourself an oscar or something. You don't want to talk about leadership b/c that requires you to look in the mirror. Ironically that's the same thing that you are requiring of us. I don't disagree w/ you or rez about apathy and it's affect- I just go a step further and ask why it's there. And that points back to you. How about instead of blaming and railing on those of us you ASSUME have done nothing- you look forward, lead and do something organizationally about the apathy? Don't you think that would be more productive?

It's funny- i know you're in no position to lead- just as i'm not- all i'm asking is that you get positive- and stop the railing- Could you do that? DO you think you could just give reasoned arguments about what needs to be done w/o the apathy-inspiring critiques? A leader is going to inspire one way or the other...
I just don't live in a fantasy world where pilots aren't getting killed by tough lines for less money, who have kids and obligations and an uncertain future- to be railed on by leadership after dealing w/ all that is ONLY disheartening. I'm being a LEADER right now when i ask you to STOP doing that.

How about every time you want to rail on us- just deliver up a March 12- wall street reminder instead. Come up w/ creative ideas to allow them to show support if they are flying or have obligations in their personal life- Unless i'm mistaken- all pilots will be affected by CAL's contract- and it's a free country and we all could demonstrate w/ them. Wouldn't that also support the idea of a national union.
 
Last edited:
I agree with your basic analysis--the statistics indicate a pilot shortage. However, the problem with the theory is that the new-hire pilots are signing on for very low salaries that don't improve much over time. Supply shortages would only raise pilot salary standards if pilots withheld services unless paid at a rate congruent with the job as a "profession" instead of as laborers.

Pilots since the mid-1980s have shown no tendency to withhold services, in fact the opposite. As long as the regional airlines can hire new 250-hour pilots at $18K a year, this won't change. No bona fide "profession" has an entry-level this low on the economic scale.

Alaska Management has already solved the shortage problem. They are hiring FOs right out of Horizon with zero PIC. Just 2000 hours total. And to management's delight, these guys are stuck and can go nowhere.
 
For the foreseeable future, as long as there are airplanes, there will be a need for pilots. Someday UAV's may change that...

I'm not sure profession is the right word to use. It seems more a vocation than a profession.
 
Interesting concept.
Creating a guild at this point would require cooperation from the government. That's impossible unless you and other pilots contribute to the PAC, which you refuse to do since you're pissed off about a single issue.
I'd personally like to see alpa's bylaws rewritten to make it less of a kleptocracy (which is what alpa has evolved into) and more of a direct democracy.
Direct democracies are clumsy and ineffective. And ALPA is nothing resembling a kleptocracy, if you even know what that means.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom