IL-76 Crews ??

[bafanguy]

Hey I think the link is www.avialeasing.com

tex,

Thanks...interesting website but that's not for North American. They're going to be strictly a US-based operation with the IL-76/78 from the guy I talked with.

 

[texarkana]

Wow, really? Thats interesting... Im guessing thats going to be a destination for eastern european pilots who want to get out of the cold and move over here!

 

[smellthejeta]

It was for IL-76 crews. It's the second time this ad has been posted in the last 6 months.

I wonder how the certification works for a foreign airplane model to be flown by a US operator with US crews. Does the IL-76 have US certification ?

Ask any operator who flies an Embraer, Canadair, Airbus, or Dassault product, and they should be able to tell you about the certification process for a foreign airplane model.

 

[bafanguy]

It was for IL-76 crews. It's the second time this ad has been posted in the last 6 months.

I wonder how the certification works for a foreign airplane model to be flown by a US operator with US crews. Does the IL-76 have US certification ?

smell,

I didn't state my question very clearly. I guess what I was wondering is if the IL-76 is currently certified by the FAA as the other airplane types you mentioned. Obviously, many foreign-made airplanes are flown in the US.

I don't know how many Russian-made airplanes are currently certified under FAA authority. Since, to my knowledge, the IL-76 has not been operated in the US before I just wondered if it has FAA approval.

I recently talked to a guy forming a cargo operator and planning to use surplus C-17s. He told me the airplane is NOT certified for use under Part 121 and getting this approval is key to the plan working.

The operator using the IL-76 here will not be a 121 operation so maybe the certification issue isn't too big a deal. The whole thing is pretty interesting nonetheless.

 

[414Flyer]

I recently talked to a guy forming a cargo operator and planning to use surplus C-17s

I dont think there is such a thing as a surplus C-17.

 

[bafanguy]

I dont think there is such a thing as a surplus C-17.

The guy I talked with said there are and they're buying a bunch. Beyond that, I don't have the foggiest. But, there's only one place to get C-17s...

 

[414Flyer]

The guy I talked with said there are and they're buying a bunch. Beyond that, I don't have the foggiest. But, there's only one place to get C-17s...

C-17 crews here have complained here about being worked to death, and with talk at times of producing more C-17s because they are being used so much, and in the middle of a war, I think that person is blowing smoke who is talking about buying a bunch of C-17s. There certainly arent any sitting in the boneyard.

McD was talking at one time about a civilian version called the MD-17, but I dont think it was economical for commericial cargo operators, so nothing ever happened with it.

 

[bafanguy]

, and in the middle of a war, I think that person is blowing smoke who is talking about buying a bunch of C-17s. There certainly arent any sitting in the boneyard.

.

...I don't know any more than I was told by the agency doing the hiring for this proposed company. I suppose lots of people have grand ideas that don't come to fruition. But this one was interesting, if not a bit far-fetched. There was no mention of C-17s in a boneyard....but there's only one place to get them and certification of the acquired airplanes was a major issue to the person with whom I spoke about this.

...just a spectator here...

 

[texarkana]

Hey guys I brought this thread back because this is true....

Here is an IL-78 owned by North American Tactical Aviation, the first of up to five (?). Their website is here. Not ver much info there, but there it is. Search for them on google, apparently they are looking for IL-76 crews and IPs on the SU-27 and MiG-29. How cool is that???
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?...r jvgu. Guvf vf nofbyhgryl gur svefg HF ertvf

 

[JimNtexas]

Hey guys I brought this thread back because this is true....

Here is an IL-78 owned by North American Tactical Aviation,

Is that pod on the pylon for a refueling hose, you think?

 

[flyboyike]

Is that pod on the pylon for a refueling hose, you think?

It certainly is, the IL-78 being a tanker and all, aka Midas. The FAA shows a valid reg, but no C of A.

 

[Helos2Galaxy]

I parked my C-5 next to one on the UAE and went ion to say a "dobra din" and have a look around; none of the gauges were placarded in english.

 

[EMBpilot]

So what kind of flying do you think NATA is doing? I can see some sort of sophisticated PMC with Il-76 hauling cargo, but fighters? IP's I guess will be teaching.. Whom?

 

[XTW]

McD was talking at one time about a civilian version called the MD-17, but I dont think it was economical for commericial cargo operators, so nothing ever happened with it.

It is to be called a BC-17X and they are trying to get approval to acquire them.

X