Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

If you're voting NO...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
"Because I said so" is not a logical reason. I'll have to ask management for a better explanation; if anyone gets a chance post the real reason here. I'm suspecting it has more to do with whipsaw opportunities.


Sorry, I thought it was self explanatory that the reason why they want to run two airlines is for the purpose of whipsaw. That's what I got out of the conversation with the MEC.


"We can't even merge 2 companies. We can't expect to realistically merge 3."



-Brad Holt


Obviously, not under his leadership.
 
He should be sheet canned the way he's run this airline but instead got a huge raise!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top