Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
XPGuy said:Why can't you respect anybody's opinions that may not agree with you? If you are anti-union, great. Be proud. However, this is a democratic country. The majority of pilots at Net Jets wanted 1108. The majority of pilots at Flight Options wants 1108 and has called a vote to join them in 1108. Flex Jet is currently working on accomplishing the same thing.
No matter how bad you attack people, you aren't going to change that. I'd like to see you bring a decent argument to not join 1108. Stop being a jerk and participate in the conversation instead of attacking people.
FL410Femme said:How does the CS pay stack up against Net Jets?
Do NJ pilots train on their day off?
How many colored pilots work at CS?
How many women pilots have left CS?
Does CS pay overtime during your duty tour?
Can you get fired from CS without notice or reason?
I guess its questions like these that continue to go unanswered, that are meaningful to some of us who are interested in knowing more of the "pilot" issues that can possibly affect us one day should we seek employment. The reason for some of the questions concern discrimination issues that I have heard about regarding CS. A workforce protected by unionization is above these issues and concerns.
Can these questions be answered by anyone with factual data without arguement or aggression?
Thanks
Did you get that in writting?FRACTRASH said:4. The training on our days on is changing this year, that is a fact.
FRACTRASH said:1. We have several colored folks working in different departments including pilots.
FL410Femme said:How does the CS pay stack up against Net Jets?
Do NJ pilots train on their day off?
How many colored pilots work at CS?
How many women pilots have left CS?
Does CS pay overtime during your duty tour?
Can you get fired from CS without notice or reason?
I guess its questions like these that continue to go unanswered, that are meaningful to some of us who are interested in knowing more of the "pilot" issues that can possibly affect us one day should we seek employment. The reason for some of the questions concern discrimination issues that I have heard about regarding CS. A workforce protected by unionization is above these issues and concerns.
Can these questions be answered by anyone with factual data without arguement or aggression?
Thanks
FRACTRASH said:Management kept every promise up to this point. I don't see a reason for it to change now. They do a great deal to keep the troupes happy. Thats how it's different here we don't have to fight and get things in writing.
XPGuy said:SkyWest recently purchased ASA. ASA is ALPA. Although SkyWest is trying very hard to not put ASA and SkyWest planes on the same route, they have already put pilots and planes interchangeably at all hubs (KSLC, KATL, etc.).
They fly the exact same equipment (CRJ's), and hub out of the exact same cities, for the most part.
The company is adamantly fighting it obviously, as if the petition for single-carrier status were approved, then all the SkyWest pilots would be subjected to BECOME ALPA union members, or at least to pay ALPA dues.
Here's the problem for SkyWest. If ASA were to win the single-carrier status, and SkyWest's pilots were not unionized, they would be subject to a staple of all their pilots to the bottom of the ASA seniority list. There is absolutely no protection for the SkyWest pilots.
Because if the vote wins, it could take years to negotiate a contract... if they get single carrier status, they would fold in ASA's contract (which isn't bad at all for a regional, I believe theirs is slightly higher than ComAir's), and save years of negotiating a contract.
Also, obviously, ALPA pilots merging to another ALPA seniority list will be as per the ALPA contract, and would be a date-of-hire integration, NOT a staple.
FRACTRASH said:XPGuy: I came from an Airline where management broke every promise. Their was always a big announcement coming up, but never happened. Unless you worked here at CS, you just won't under stand. It's an entirely different culture and mind set here. They know, in order to remain successful, they have to treat their employees with respect and make CS a place you want to work. Braking promises would be unproductive.
Hawkered said:I can just imagine you Bogart! Sitting there in all of your bald and obese frame staring over horn rim glasses, whacking off to computer porn! I'm sure you're quite the woman's fantasy!
NOT!!!
Hawkered said:Is that statement as accurate as your spelling?
1. There
2. understand
3. Breaking
Where on earth did you go to school? Why on earth did they let you graduate?!!!
Hawkered said:Again... a detractor with no new arguments, nor anything original to add to the argument.
Hawkered said:Thanks for bringing the post back up to the top for me!
For those who would like to know how to get a union on property, go back to the first post.
Nearly 5,000 views; not bad really!
XPGuy said:You don't pay union dues. That's the only advantage. Of course, if you ask any Net Jets pilot, I doubt they are complaining about paying their measly 1.5% monthly union dues for the $30k+ raise each and every one of them recently received, not to mention, one crew just put one off the runway, and they will reap the benefits of a Union representing them in the aftermath of bending up an airplane.
Fractrash has the brains of a frozen cranberry. Just do a history of his posts and you will see that he really has no concept of fractional aviation, and his posts are always demeaning to others, forcing them on the defensive, and supplying no factual information for his blasting flamebait posts.
Fewer and fewer companies in aviation that are considered "large" don't have unions. One of the most recognized companies for not having a union and having an excellent relationship with management in the past is SkyWest airlines.
Well, Skywest airlines is now in a union drive trying to get ALPA on the property. The problem? A common one that often makes people wish they had a union already - mergers & aquisitions.
SkyWest recently purchased ASA. ASA is ALPA. Although SkyWest is trying very hard to not put ASA and SkyWest planes on the same route, they have already put pilots and planes interchangeably at all hubs (KSLC, KATL, etc.).
Both pilot groups are worried about the other - airplanes going to one "company", therefore upgrades are attached, any down-sizing, etc. Also, ASA is worried rightfully so, that should the unlikely but still possible situation that ASA strike, the SkyWest pilots are not unionized, and could be forced to fly ASA's "struck work"... and in fact the company could utilize SkyWest's pilots at leisure, including hiring more pilots, to fly ASA's aircraft.
The fact that ASA has a contract protecting them and SkyWest does not puts SkyWest pilots in a dangerous position. SkyWest pilots have zero leverage with the parent company, and ASA does. ASA wants to file for single-carrier status - as they should. They fly the exact same equipment (CRJ's), and hub out of the exact same cities, for the most part. There is language in ASA's contract (as all contracts have) which allows them to file for single-carrier status in such situations.
The company is adamantly fighting it obviously, as if the petition for single-carrier status were approved, then all the SkyWest pilots would be subjected to BECOME ALPA union members, or at least to pay ALPA dues.
Here's the problem for SkyWest. If ASA were to win the single-carrier status, and SkyWest's pilots were not unionized, they would be subject to a staple of all their pilots to the bottom of the ASA seniority list. There is absolutely no protection for the SkyWest pilots.
Now. If SkyWest wins a vote and gets ALPA on the property, then it's a win-win for the SkyWest pilots, because now they can HELP with the single-carrier status... why would they do that? Because if the vote wins, it could take years to negotiate a contract... if they get single carrier status, they would fold in ASA's contract (which isn't bad at all for a regional, I believe theirs is slightly higher than ComAir's), and save years of negotiating a contract.
Also, obviously, ALPA pilots merging to another ALPA seniority list will be as per the ALPA contract, and would be a date-of-hire integration, NOT a staple.
As you can see, even the best relationships between management and employees can change literally overnight. When ASA was purchased by SkyWest, the relationship between SkyWest's pilots and management changed drastically, forcing those pilots to desperately need a union to protect them.
SafetyTheSeat said:question for the CS guys:
Do you guys go to training on your days off?
Can you guys call in tired and not lose your jobs?
Can you guys write an aircraft up when pax may be put out?
Aren't you tired of CS calling you in on the carpet for doing your job?