Yeah Alpie, Opie, or Albie--whatever moniker you are going by this afternoon! (Smoosh, I had a good laugh at that misspelling )
Now on to a very contentious question on this topic.
My question is this: what role did the various pilot's unions have in the current situation? Specifically, did the unions significantly contribute to the economic decline of the majors, or are they simply another factor of equal impact on the current ugly state?
If so, what provides the balance in the equation? By that I mean at what point should a union concede that wage cuts are necessary to ensure the company stays afloat?
I asked this same question in June of 01 on the old board, but had no takers. Things have changed, eh? The current crunch on the industry has been blamed on many things, high labor costs being one. So, I ask again, what's the scoop on unions?
My take on the subject. Should unions exist? Of course. Unions have played an essential role in this industry, just like others, to ensure the rights and needs of workers are respected. I didn't always understand that.
An AA friend of mine explained the need for a union to me several years ago, though. "You live in one of the most perfect socialist systems ever developed," he said, "The US military. They
want to ensure you are healthy, safe and more or less happy. They'll do whatever it takes to balance the mission and 'people' issues to make you content, or at the very least, complaining softly. Civilian corporations, especially airlines, are NOT like that. There is no more 'socialist' protection--it is each side on it's own. Management will suck the life out of you if you have no protections. The union provides that protection."
Sounded rather harsh at the time, but it made sense. (Ed. note: Make no mistake--I'm extremely lucky that my current employer is nothing like that illustration, but I acknowledge that other companies are not as employee oriented as JB.)
Nevertheless (and here's where my opinion will likely make me flamed and reviled beyond hope), I think wage pressure is a significant issue to the current situation, and can't be ignored as a causal factor. Pay is not the only topic at blame here, as the above posts indicate. There are LOTS of factors at work, such as fleet mix, hub inefficiencies, and fickle consumer demand. In fact, I believe that our country's economic downturn is the single largest factor in this equation. Here's my main question, though: isn't a pay raise that helps to push a company over the fiscal edge of bankruptcy self-defeating? After all, if you get the raise but help force the company to go under, don't you loose overall? I've seen articles in respected journals (WSJ, NYT) that address United's pay increase as a major factor in their teetering economic situation. Why did both sides let things decline so far?
My sense is that the "pressure relief valve" of wage concessions operates only at the brink of disaster, with US Airways' latest agreement as a prime example. Why so late? Simply put, pilots don't trust management as far as they can throw them (I am fortunate to be excluded from this group) and believe all company-generated pronouncements of fiscal gloom and doom are simply negotiating tools. Some undoubtedly
are tricks to dupe unsuspecting workers; other company statements have evidently told the truth. Thus the lack of trust inhibits the free exchange of information, and therefore slows the whole process down. Is that policy the best for all concerned? No, but then again this is the real world, with lots of competing agendas. Much as I may look like PollyAnna, I'm not.
Great "free hand of economics" granddaddy Adam Smith would be aghast at this turn of events, but hey, he's dead and dust in some London cemetary.
In short, union-led wage demands contributed to this problem, but mistrust (on both sides) inhibited prompt negotiations to resolve it. Finally, I don't see a way around this cycle due to longstanding competing and non-congruent objectives, e.g. management wants to make money regardless of worker welfare, and unions want to maximize benefits, no matter the economic impact to the company.
Before you light the torch, please understand the following:
--I believe in the right to unionize and negotiate--if the need exists.
--I believe a pilot should have a superb income.
--I believe that a mindless obsession with money does not contribute to long-term success, no matter the profession--or position.
Most of all--I hope that our bros/sis's currently out of work out there gain their flying jobs back quickly. I take no comfort in the misfortune of others, no matter who they are employed by.
A good pilot's always learning--so educate me with your take on these questions!
And Clownpilot--I don't think anybody out here on the board wants others in the industry to suffer. Sorry you don't understand that.