CesnaCaptn
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2001
- Posts
- 724
so what you are saying is commuting is not allowed nor welcome at said airlines then? How do you explain the dozens that do it then?
Nowhere has anyone said that commuting is "not allowed nor welcome at said airlines." Pilots who live in base are more desirable. That is to say, pilots who don't live in base are less desirable. You don't have to like it, but that's the way it is. I have heard from multiple management types that AS actively seeks out applicants who want to live in ANC, SoCal and the PNW. I'm sure a similar conversation happens at HA.
And how is this any different than the new hire who lives in Idaho at Delta getting JFK as his base? Really..
You really can't see the difference? The new hire Delta pilot has a fighting chance at getting a short, one-leg commute to SLC or SEA. If said pilot chooses to live in Idaho, pickings are slim for easy commutes. A pilot who doesn't live in base (HNL or ANC) will have a long commute from the lower 48. I'm willing to bet that most pilots who work for HA or AS, during their interview, either showed willingness to move to ANC or HNL or had a darn good explanation for how their commute would go if they planned to stay on the mainland.
Sounds more like someone is trying to justify a preference that really should not exist in the first place.
igneousy2, said "I think Alaska and Hawaiian like "local" pilots because they are least likely to up and leave...people that haven't lived in Alaska/Hawaii often, don't last very long." Most HR departments are looking for loyal pilots, who will bend over backwards for the company and won't leave in a few years if the going gets rough (I realize this type of pilot is few and far between).