• NC Software is having a Black Friday Sale Event thru December 4th on Logbook Pro, APDL - Airline Pilot Logbook, Cirrus Elite Binders, and more. Use coupon code BF2020 at checkout to redeem 15% off your purchase. Click here to shop now.
  • NC Software is proud to announce the release of APDL - Airline Pilot Logbook version 10.0. Click here to view APDL on the Apple App store and install now.

Greenjets - Shared-Ride Private Jet Service

rondo

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Posts
141
Total Time
some
i can assure you. there is nothing green about a jet.
what do there jets run on. rudder bands, granola and "Hope."

whatever
 

taximan

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Posts
5
seems like coupling people on a single flight instaed of flying each on their own might be a good idea - if you disagree, it would be like saying cars cannot be more environmentaly friendly when car pooling. The again, what do you expect from a guy who thkns its cool to give everyone the finger!!!
 

jonjuan

Honey Ryder
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Posts
4,155
Total Time
3,000+
Why is it that everyone pictured on the website looks as though they are straight out of a porno cast? Not that there's anything wrong with it. :)
 

rondo

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Posts
141
Total Time
some
Where's Ron Jeremy?

Why is it that everyone pictured on the website looks as though they are straight out of a porno cast? Not that there's anything wrong with it. :)

Yeah, I noticed that too. It looks like a cheesy adventure porno.
 

waka

Emasculating the Right
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Posts
1,972
Total Time
4?
i can assure you. there is nothing green about a jet.


yes but, there are greener ways of using jets. there's nothing wrong with mitigating the impact.

what do there jets run on. rudder bands, granola and "Hope."

no, they run on blood from massive wars over resources.



whatever
 

jonjuan

Honey Ryder
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Posts
4,155
Total Time
3,000+
no, they run on blood from massive wars over resources.

Sweet. Now i know where the Beechjet got its former name.
 

rondo

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Posts
141
Total Time
some
yes but, there are greener ways of using jets. there's nothing wrong with mitigating the impact.

I agree, there's nothing wrong with mitigating the impact, cutting down on wasteful habits.

Its funny, this so called "green movement" and all the aspects that come with it are starting to remind me of Germany it the late 1930's. It seems like if you disagree with any of this "green" stuff you are some kind of criminal.

The other funny part is the folks pumping this green movement all seem to drive their SUV's to the gym to walk on a treadmill, but you sure do see a lot of corona bottles in the can, come recycling day.

I like how people just randomly follow new trends like lemmings because the media and politicians tell them to.

Like I said before, whatever.
 

TurboHonda

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Posts
167
Total Time
>1500
Give me a break

"Green Jets Incorporated (Greenjets) arranges flights on behalf of clients and Greenjetcard members with FAR Part 135 air carriers that exercise full operational control of charter flights at all times. Greenjets does not own or operate aircraft. Flights are operated by FAR Part 135 air carriers that meet all FAA safety standards and additional safety standards established by Greenjets."

Just another broker with a new angle. I wonder what the additional safety standards might be.
 

taximan

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Posts
5
they use only ARGUS gold and platinum operators... I think this is the additional safety they are refering to... its on their website along with the pornstars....
 

waka

Emasculating the Right
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Posts
1,972
Total Time
4?
What mitigating impact? :confused:

Global warming? That is a hoax.

Who am I to believe? The NSF, its equivalent in other countries, overwhelming majority of universities and even the major oil companies?

-or-

denial brought on by "profits first" politically motivated preconceived notions and babbling right wing radio talk show hosts?



I choose the scientists.
 

G21Agoose

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2004
Posts
409
Total Time
.
Why is it that everyone pictured on the website looks as though they are straight out of a porno cast? Not that there's anything wrong with it. :)

I've never watched a porn movie so please explain....
 

hyflyin

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 7, 2007
Posts
382
Total Time
Whoa
Who am I to believe? The NSF, its equivalent in other countries, overwhelming majority of universities and even the major oil companies?

-or-

denial brought on by "profits first" politically motivated preconceived notions and babbling right wing radio talk show hosts?



I choose the scientists.

Right, because nobody is profiting from "Green". Stop acting like a sheeple. Do you honestly think man can change the weather??? Its a bit more complex than that.

This is a push to find alternative fuels and create more wealth (the new oil barons), other wise we wouldn't be funding, subsidizing, things like corn ethanol (which produces more CO2 than it saves) and taxing things like sugar ethanol.

And how about those green light bulbs, you know the ones with mercury in them, that take 13 steps to clean up. Nothing like dumping a mercury in our land fills.
 
Last edited:

waka

Emasculating the Right
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Posts
1,972
Total Time
4?
Right, because nobody is profiting from "Green". Stop acting like a sheeple. Do you honestly think man can change the weather??? Its a bit more complex than that.

There is far more profit motive in preserving the status-quo. Besides, profitting from "Green" can only be good.
There's a distinct difference between the definition of weather and climate. Apparently it is too "complex" for you. There is a wonderful book called a dictionary. You might want to refer to it from time to time.

This is a push to find alternative fuels and create more wealth (the new oil barons), other wise we wouldn't be funding, subsidizing, things like corn ethanol (which produces more CO2 than it saves) and taxing things like sugar ethanol.

The corn ethanol farce is born of the right wing and the corn refiner lobby. Sugar ethanol is much more efficient and imported sugar shouldn't have its high tariffs. Why the high tariffs? The corn refiner lobby!


And how about those green light bulbs, you know the ones with mercury in them, that take 13 steps to clean up. Nothing like dumping a mercury in our land fills.

Aren't you Johnny-on-the-spot original about CFL's?:rolleyes: That information has been out for quite some time and it was environmentalists that broke that story.

Anyway, because of you just mindlessly bouncing around with trite attacks on environmentalists in general, it sound like you get your talking points from right wing radio. Your position stems from politicians and pundits, my position is based on an overwhelming majority consensus of scientists....none of which has been successfully refuted by you, Fox News or the Rush Limbaugh's of the world. News for you: you are the one behaving like sheep. baaaaaaa
 
Last edited:

rondo

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Posts
141
Total Time
some
waka,

shouldn't you be out now collecting recyclables in your special green bag.

you spout this green crap on this forum, but you still have 8000 hours of pumping hazardous gases into our atmosphere. do you use veggie oil as fuel?

By your definition, you are the cause of global warming. why don't you quit flying and stop changing our weather patterns.

;)


y
 
Top